Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just had my gt30 500hp turbo with internal wastegate fitted, my rb25 pulled 260rwkws at 20psi and 229 rwkws at 13psi. just wanting any feed back from anyone else who maybe running similar combo. car goes really hard now, even though im very happy with the results would upgrading my cams make any difference tp peak power or would the results be miniscule compared to the outlay and cost???? would be interested in peoples thoughts and opinions?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69833-gt-30-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have a mate with a GT30 with the smallest ex housing (0.63) making 353rwhp at 19 psi on a FJ20. Engine standard apart from cams + pistons. He made this on pump fuel.

I think your car being a 2.5 has much much left in it. Fuel limits the FJs to about 350rwhp so you should make 430 rwhp no probs. Obviously you have problems with airflow into the engine and in addition maybe the tune is conservative. My advice for making the 430rwhp: Get some tomei cams and upgrade from those pissy 240 degree 7.8mm cams....they're holding you back enormously. Get some 270s and your power will be there.

I get my car tuned next week tuesday so Ill let you know how it goes.

exactly.

my 600HP GT30 - with the GT series wheel (6 blade) makes 270rwkw on 16psi.

So an int Gated version of the 500HP variety wont make anymore.

I'd be very happy wtih the result.

CAMS might get you a little, but stock 25DET heads are pretty good for 300rwkw with the stockers

There are .63 ARR housings and .63 ARR housings . If its the poor old Nissan cast T3 housing reprofiled your on your own . This combination is known not to work properly . Garrett does make a proper .63 version of the GT30 84 trim housing which works well on FJ20's . If you must have an integral waste gate housing HKS do them in .68 and .87 for the PRO S version of their GT3037 which is the same CHRA as the GT30R and has the T3 flange . These housings are expensive but cheap compared to external gates and custom manifolds and good enough for the street .

My opinions cheers A .

Yes , that CHRA in Garrett speak in Pt no 700382-12 for the same thing . Some Garrett BB CHRA's need the locating groove machined 1-2 mm deeper into

early HkS housings but its a std thing nowdays . There was once a string at a US SR20 site about someone using one of ATP's (Garretts) GT3071R's in a T28 flanged .73 ARR HKS housing and it needed this mod . In that case the 3071R CHRA was being substituted for a damaged 3037 core so the original assembly was an early build HKS turbo . 90% of them go bolt .

GCG said they can get them for about $800 though I enquired some time ago . These use HKS's GT Pro outlet on the back so you may need to make a dump pipe for it .

Cheers A .

I have a mate with a GT30 with the smallest ex housing (0.63) making 353rwhp at 19 psi on a FJ20. Engine standard apart from cams + pistons. He made this on pump fuel.

I think your car being a 2.5 has much much left in it. Fuel limits the FJs to about 350rwhp so you should make 430 rwhp no probs. Obviously you have problems with airflow into the engine and in addition maybe the tune is conservative. My advice for making the 430rwhp: Get some tomei cams and upgrade from those pissy 240 degree 7.8mm cams....they're holding you back enormously. Get some 270s and your power will be there.

I get my car tuned next week tuesday so Ill let you know how it goes.

hey dude,

just wondering, do u feel that the GT30R is laggy on the street with the A/R .82 exhaust housing?

when do u roughly get full boost?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...