Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmmm, tough question.

If both engines are STOCK:

The RB20DET will be much more efficient then that of the SR20DET. Apart from more torque. the engines made for a slightly heavier car.

HOWEVER,

If you are serious about modifying the engine. The SR20 will be much cheaper to as parts are more widespread and at the same time there are less cylinders. The SR20 is much more stable at higher powers than the RB20.

I'm no mechanic, but thats how I would be considering it.

If it were me, the choice would be between an SR20DET and an RB25DET. Converting an SR (or even a CA) 180 to an RB isn't worth it, IMO, if you just go with the RB20. Nice engine, but the costs incurred would've been better spent either modifying the SR (or making the diff between a CA and SR 180) or spending that bit extra and going the full hog with an RB25 (or RB30!).

Hmmm, tough question.

If both engines are STOCK:

The RB20DET will be much more efficient then that of the SR20DET. Apart from more torque. the engines made for a slightly heavier car.

The RB20 actually has less torque than the SR20det.

There's something about the low down torque that makes the sr20 more enjoyable (imo). When driving my flatmates r32 I find I have to push it always, mine I can drive under 4000rpm and it still pulls up hills with stuff in the car AND it's my cars heavier.

But the rb20 is cheaper and revs out nicer and also has a great exhaust note, it's refined and urgent.. the sr20 is harsher and gnashy.

On the other hand as mentioned somewhere with an sr20 in it, it's the engine that it came with from the factory so bolt on stuff would be easier.

Heh I really like the sr20 but loving my old 351 v8 I would pick the torque over the revs.

Bollocks, harden front susp.

No. What he is referring to is the alloy block of the SR20 weighing less than that of the RB20. By putting a heavier engine in, it disrupts the natural balance of the car.

The way I see it the SR20 was produced up until 2002. So it can't be that bad.

hey guys sorry if im wasting your time on this but i just wanted to know what you's think would run better in a 180SX.... a SR20DET or a RB20DET

no doubt the SR20 is the smart choice. it's lighter, it's designed for the car, and it has no problems in making equal power to the RB. only reason to put an RB in there (either 20, 25 or 26) is to be different (not really valid as heaps of people have done these swaps) or for the sound. do the smart thing, stick with the SR.

Hmm, this thread looks like it belongs on nissansilvia.com, not sau

Yeah how good are S13 Silvias that come standard from factory with RB20DET..

Think about the fact he is asking because people on SAU most likely have *RB20DET*'s in their R32 GTS-t's...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...