Jump to content
SAU Community

  

311 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

when buyin my car

my first choice was a supra as i've always wanted one since i first saw them

Yeah, I was lucky enough to be allowed to test drive one when I was shopping around with my dad for my car & I'm still drooling from the experience hehe.

I love how the dash seems to wrap around you and the electric seats were fun to play with too :headspin:

However I am forever loyal to skylines now so I voted for the GTT

hmm you sure about that release date ??????

cause mines a March 98 build........... No. 216 off the line....

According to the details that i have er34 was released for sale may 98 and bnr 34 , january 99 .

I guess they would have built some cars before the release date .

I have no reason not to believe the info that i have ..

Ok what about 4 door versions

R34 GTT 4 door

       vs

JZX100 chaser mkII

I still can't decide.

Oh geez, here we go! I vote the JZX100 for sure. Ok, maybe i'm bias, but they're hot. And no where near as many on the roads as the 34's, so relatively unique. However that works against you when you're modifying it, as i've found out recently....

One other factor I guess you also have to take into consideration is vehicle age and price. A majority of RZs going around are 93/94 (pushing to say 1995) models, while the oldest R34 is a 1998 model. You look at 1998 model supras and your looking at big $$$. We all know what I am getting at

...

Go the R34 :rofl:

i love my nissan. i really do. the gtr is a much better package than the supra when it comes down to driving. the supra FEELS heavy, when the line feels much more sporty. compare an RZ to a GTT??? supra any day.

and anyone that thinks toyota's better engines (1j, 2j, 1uz among many others) aren't performers better get their facts right. if it weren't for my loyalty to nissan engineers, i'd drop one of those engines into my gtr anyday. the 26 is nice. very nice. but its not as nice as a nice toyota six or eight imo.

2c

d

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My theory would revolve around the ~4000rpm point being peak torque territory on an RB, where you're supposed to be looking at max efficiency of the head, etc, and....just not having it because the skinny ports are doing something to f**k it up. I'll admit, it's a loose theory.
    • It could be in the tune but in both cases it couldn't be completely solved or eliminated by some of the best tuners in victoria so I'm DOUBTFUL that it's in the tune or ECU but stranger things have happened of course. I've pondered that theory too but is there any theories that thinner and smaller ports overall would cause a turbo to spike? I would've thought it would just restrict it in general if it was small enough to make a difference. I wouldn't expect it to make a different at what is essentially sub 300kw at 4000rpm anyway. I think the next step is going to have to be the 6psi spring to rule out the idea that the gate is cracking open far too wide initially. At least that is the cheapest (free) thing to check initially.
    • I'm thinking it is skinny NA Neo port sizing and cams. Somehow.
    • -5’s did it. 8474 did it. Not hot side related. ECU related? 🤨🤪
    • Above you mentioned you only need to sand primer if there's an issue with it but with fillers it says the surface needs to be sanded to X grit beforehand. Does that sorta contradict that point as the primer hasn't been sanded yet? At the same time if I sand the primer, there's a good chance I'll expose the bare metal and I'm just chasing my tail at that point. Or I'll just use a sand sponge instead of sandpaper, it seems to be far finer in terms of abrasiveness as opposed to sandpaper. From what I understand, filler is like primer and needs scratches from the sandpaper to help it adhere to the panel. I realised the way I'm doing things is actually a bit counter productive as there's a chance after I put filler I will need to put epoxy primer again as opposed to putting the filler first and potentially no primer if I don't go to bare metal. Will keep this in my mind for the rest of my repairs.
×
×
  • Create New...