Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yellow GTRs are soft :P

I reckon its great to see them out there giving it some, Wakefield is a tricky track to get a quick time, it is certainly not all about power there...I take it the quick cars were running slicks?

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

just to clarify MR WRX has had over 100 runs at WSID and is driven everyday

the reason the gearbox failed was due to a dodgy billet rear input shaft

which wasnt made to the exact clearances that were needed

 

its a real 10 second street car and driving it along you would not pick

it its one of the most comfortable, smooth cars ive been in

and the way brian punishes it all day everyday i am shocked that it lasted this long

 

diablo is also very smooth and easily street driven he regularly drives it from canberra to sydney and has no problems with it

the reason it failed was because TRP made the mistake of using a copper head gasket when they were told not to

I happily stand corrected:D Bit of a bummer that they both failed, but using a copper headgasket on tough car does seem a bit odd. Look forward to seeing the results in AutoSalon Mag:D

to clear things up

the FTR ran 2 10.9 second passses on street tyres and low boost as it was running a standard geabox

it also ran the fastest lap tim of 1:08

it also did 540rwkW on pump fuel with a shot of NOS

its a VERY relaible car that had NO problems on the weeknbd

also OSMANS didnt win the braking- the blue S14 did without ABS and standard brakes with bendix pads....it beat the STi by 4metres

the GTR was also the only car to have full engineering certificates for the car. it did well i every category except fuel efficiency but what do you expect from the curent autosalon power recoird holder?

and before you ask yes i was there as i was competing

hence them both leaving and going to a different workshop

TRP is closing soon anyway

WTF?!?!?!?!?

also OSMANS didnt win the braking- the blue S14 did without ABS and standard brakes with bendix pads....it beat the STi by 4metres

Congratulations :(

Adrian

the GTR did run but i cant remember the time

MR WRX has done a 1:04 last time he was there not this time and yes it was the full track

LOL...i have to ask/:(

Who was their to witness/time this 1:04. Considering that quicker then any road car i know of and quicker then GTP WRXs with fully sorted suspension, professional driver, and good response/traction... i have to say someone is talking it up massively, a bit liek me when i say i can do 1:10s around Wakefield:)

As Duncan says, Wakefield is not a power circuit, and a 10sec WRX suggests the thing would be rolling between many of the corners looking for boost?!?!?!?! I have no problem believing it could maybe do a 1:08 or higher, but yeh...ill wait until i read the article...the more i think about it i think the timers may have been helping out a few of the cars with a second here and there:)

Australian Performance Cars - Qualifying

Qualifying Q6 30 Mins

Scheduled Start 10:45

Page# 1 Issue# 1

Start Sat May 14 10:45

Elapsed Time 30:00

________________________________________________________________________________

_______________

Pos Car Entrant Driver Vehicle Cap CL Laps Fastest...Lap

1 34 Delphi/King Springs Mark King Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 3395 11 11 1:04.2313*

2 4 Readymix Gary Young Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 3395 21 20 1:04.4006

3 21 Century 21 Real Estate Garry Holt Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 3395 18 4 1:04.5436

4 11 Rondo Building Services Barry Morcom Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 3395 23 21 1:04.8141

5 22 Jack Hillermans Smash Chris Alajajian Subaru WRX STi 3390 18 10 1:04.8182

________________________________________________________________________________

_______________

Pos Car  Entrant                        Driver                   Vehicle              Cap   CL   Laps   Fastest...Lap  

1    34  Delphi/King Springs            Mark King                Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 3395         11    11 1:04.2313*  

2     4  Readymix                       Gary Young               Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 3395         21    20 1:04.4006  

3    21  Century 21 Real Estate         Garry Holt               Mitsubishi Lancer Ev 3395         18     4 1:04.5436

Do they run slicks?

to clear things up

 

 the FTR ran 2 10.9 second passses on street tyres and low boost as it was running a standard geabox

 

 it also ran the fastest lap tim of 1:08

 

 it also did 540rwkW on pump fuel with a shot of NOS

 

 its a VERY relaible car that had NO problems on the weeknbd

 

also OSMANS didnt win the braking- the blue S14 did without ABS and standard brakes with bendix pads....it beat the STi by 4metres

 

the GTR was also the only car to have full engineering certificates for the car. it did well i every category except fuel efficiency but what do you expect from the curent autosalon power recoird holder?

 

 and before you ask yes i was there as i was competing

charles told me osmans won it.

as for the GTR funny thing was they kept changing the car before every test

it was loud as all *** when it was on the track and you could smell the C16 but when it was in front of the engineer funny how it only hit 88db.

brians car has mountains of torque because its a 2.5 and isnt a laggy bitch either due to the turbo not being massive like his other car (NOCOMP)

its a every well sorted car and he is a great driver and knows the circuit very well.

the 1:04 was not at the SCOTY day which i said in my earlier post.

the only S15 there was jerrys one

there were to S14s though

please dont tell me it was MR dori dori in the blue one

because he locked up and ended up almost doing a 180 cause he tried the hand brake

the only cars that needed a warm up were the autostyle cars LMAO

street cars that need to warm up thier tyres and brakes before going out LOL

****ing pathetic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...