Jump to content
SAU Community

My R34 GT-R Black [STOCK], R34 GT-R Bayside Blue, R33 -> R34 White/Pearl GT-R V-Spec


Recommended Posts

GT-R_M-$pec]Hello Everyone

I'm from Brisbane, love Skylines! I have many, i import them. The ones below are just a few of my R34 GT-R's. Hope you like them. They are stock so, yeah.. don't expect toooo much :devil2:

1. I think i'm seeing things in 3's!

Imseeing3s.jpg

These are a few pictures of my Black R34 GT-R! Has no rear wing, though i had a spare and i placed it on 4 rubber things to see what it looks like.

Let me know what you think. Rear wing or not?

1. In Front of my house

(See My R33->R34 GT-R V-Spec in the background?)

BlackR34GT-RSkyline.jpg

2. Front View

BlackFront.jpg

3. Rear View

BlackRear.jpg

4. Engine Bay

BlackEngineBay.jpg

5. Rear Wing

BlackRearWing.jpg

6. Rear Wing 2

BlackRearWing2.jpg

These are a few pictures of my R33 that i converted to a R34. It is full of Genuine R34 Parts. No Fibre-Glass! Full Aluminium Bonnet!

Customly done myself, Side vents, bonnet, i did the whole complete car.

Tell me what you think! Its not too bad! :cheers: I put in Australia AutoSalon 2003 and it came away with

"Thats a Slick Body Kit"

1. Side View

WhitePearlSide.jpg

2. Front View

WhitePearlFront.jpg

3. Rear View

WhitePearlRear.jpg

4. Rear View 2

WhitePearlRearSide.jpg

5. Aluminium Bonnet (Customly Done Myself)

WhitePearlBonnet.jpg

6. Side Vents (Customly Done Myself)

WhitePearlRightAirVents.jpg

These are only a few pictures of my Bayside Blue R34 GT-R Skyline V-Spec.

Haven't we all asked how would a R34 GT-R Skyline go against a Porsche 996 Twin Turbo S?

Well there are a few pictures below, with a:

Porsche 996 Twin Turbo S vs R34 GT-R Skyline V-Spec

I even once read in a magazine called "Speed" They actually compared a Porsche 996 Twin Turbo to a R34 Skyline GT-R

Let me know what you think.

1. Porsche 996 Twin Turbo S vs R34 GT-R Skyline V-Spec

Porsche996Twin-TurbovsR34GT-RSkylineV-Spec.jpg

2. Who Will Win?

nice.jpg

3. The GT-R looks alot bigger than the Porsche

WhowillWin.jpg

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OMFG

Beautiful cars, beautiful house :drooling:

where are the pics of the chics

I am so jealous of you

(I am sure that's the comment you were looking for) :cheers:

I hate you! :) *adds you to "most envied list" :cheers:

Haha - all I can say man, is WOW! I hope I'm that rich one day... wake up in the morning...

"hrmm, which car do I take to work today? oh - that's right! i dont need to work! time for a hotlap up the mountains! now which car to take... oh this is so hard! curse my life"

*dreams*

Awesome, absolutely awesome!

:wassup: Thanks for the comments!!

Yeah, EZY34 the white car was at the front before even going in. :cheers: Got in too late to get a spot inside ;)

Anyway, yeah its quite difficult selling R34 GT-R's... but yeah.. hmm..

I was going up toward Sunshine Coast... Bli Bli i think it was.. that was when i raced a Corvette :) Had issues with some piping.. wasn't properly sealed... loss of power... though was still able to stay in front :):)

Hmm.. chicks aye.. they've come and gone.. :ufo:

Thanks again.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...