Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

After a long and extensive search i have finally found out that i have a twin Garrett GT2560R setup on my GTR!!

I thought they were N1's and then Group A's, but now i can definitely confirm that they are GT2560's!

Wanted to find out who is running this setup and what sort of power people have been making??

Are they the same as the larger R34 N1's??

Any info would be great!!

Cheers,

Francisco

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78172-gtr-turbos-garrett-gt2560r/
Share on other sites

Was going to get my original turbos rebuilt....but am having a set of these GT 2560's fitted instead around the 11th July I will post dyno results but am not looking for Huge HP figures, so dont expect to be overly impressed.

I was told they are very similar to N1's.

Although I beleive pnblight is running these turbos and has made 530rwHP.....

i took 1 million photos of them when my engine was out and couldnt match the numbers & position of the marks on the front covers with anything, until i saw Spool Imports photos!!

Then Checked the photes with other suppliers pics & It all matches up, i couldnt figure out how group A's would contiunue to spin for 20secs after i switch the engine off!! I knew they were ball bearing, but thats it

Pete , those are the terbs we can get for a good price but they have none in stock and looks around 3 months before they will have some more.

Have our guys trying to convince Garrett to speed up the wait as with the new pricing , these are very good value for money.

Cheers

Ken

Guys

I have R34 N1s on my R32 GTR and the Nissan part number is : 14411-AA403

Mine have the .42 compressor housing tho ( YES they DO Exist – and Nissan will confirm it if you give them this part number)

AFAIK these are series one R34 N1s and they came off an R34-GTR V-spec II

I'm getting 300+awkw ATM @ 1.2bar – but I NEED bigger injectors

HtH

Scott

hey guys just on the same topic i was wondering how these turbos that u r talking about (same as pnblight) how do they compare to hks 2530s in max power and response?

i hear people saying 500hp at wheels is too much for these turbos, but only pnblights freak gtr :( has got the higher figure.

im trying to decide between these turbos, hks 2530s, single t04z, single garret GT35/40R for my stock capacity rb26 wanting response as most importance and capable of abit over 500hp at wheels with suitable other parts which i have already :)

any info/comments most welcome

thanks guys

Brad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...