Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Do i get a cookie  :Pimp2:

:cookie:

tommyk I don't see why not:

the highest peak was 253kw but we settled on the 247 as it made more midrange than the 253 setting.

dyno_graph_-_247vs221p.JPG

COOL

What mods do you have and was that run done in awd or rwd mode ?

You guys suck. You make me want to buy a pair of GT-SS's :D

as for mods mine is still stock turbos, stock cams, stock intercooler, stock dumps, stock front pipes. just 3 inch cat back system, apexi pods, cam gears, 14.5psi boost, and power FC. obviously have other unrelated stuff like oil cooler, twin plate clutch, OS gearset etc etc. the first graph showing 221kw was before the cam gear adjustment. in the process of adjusting the gears boost also rose by 2psi (without touching the controller) and the AFRs leaned off a bit (also without touching the PFC). so that may have influenced the gain a little too.

is that graph rwkw or awkw ?

Why do I ask ?

Ive got everything you have including 15psi boost, aftermarket front pipes, but i dont have the pods or gears

Sorry for the hijack kabab

sorry mate, it's in rwd. so outright power i would say it's pretty much the same between us (i don't know really) but the shape of the curve is what is most important to me at the moment, not the peak figure. :D

sorry mate, it's in rwd. so outright power i would say it's pretty much the same between us (i don't know really) but the shape of the curve is what is most important to me at the moment, not the peak figure. :D

I noticed when mine was on the dyno it was in full 4wd mode so i guess thats why your figure is much higher then Tommyk's..

What would the difference be between awd and rwd power wise?

to be honest i really don't know. i have heard lots of stories. some people say on a 32 GTR the difference is negligible (something about the way they divert torque to the front wheels on a dyno), other say about 30kws difference. personally i think there must be some difference but how much i wouldn't want to guess.

Suffice to say that, as always, a dyno is not the best dick measuring tool as everyone has a different ruler.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...