Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Strich9ine

look at all these people with mods tho.... hicks is pulling 13.7 (BEST)  

and he's got 14psi, POD, full zorst, FMIC.. all that...  

if you can pull a high 13 stock, why spend $2500 on those mods ?

hence my theory of not getting a stocker in the 13s....

Traction a big part of drag racing is the 60ft put some slicks on that sucker and watch the times tumble..

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by summoner

not much differance? go learn what mods do to a car kabab.. i woulda thought u'd have half a clue considering how long u been on forums. Exhausts.. especially on turbo cars help, not just by the better flow but by the inherent boost increase which comes with this better flow etc. So an exhaust is a decent mod for a car. put a stock exhaust on and see how asthmatic your car feels especially top end.

As kabab said, on the R33 GTS-t, you will maybe gain 1-2 rwkw by doing the cat-back section. This is because the restriction is found in the dump pipe, not the cat-back section. After going the dump, front pipe and 3" cat, I noticed a HUGE increase in power, but didn't notice any power increase at all when I bolted the cat-back section on.

Air filter was probably good for another 1-2rwkw...

So at that stage, I managed a 14.3 with a STOCK CAR (plus 4-6rwkw in mods)... Hardly earth shattering mods.

I have got a 13.8 sec pass with a mildy modified R33.

The conditions were as per the signature below. Namely 8psi ,over 100kgs in the boot + boxes of crap on all the seats and little 205's.

Having said all that my car is not stock (ie: it has mods). I don't believe the factory stock car could get past a flat 14 or 13.9 tops. If the stock turbo was taken to 20psi for one run (might take a few turbos before it did a run without blowing up) it might get a mid 13. Quite a pointless excercise.

Nissan slacked off on lots of areas from factory. Thus far the only mods to my car have been to correct the cheap ass inefficient parts. All the mods have added something to the power but not effected the fuel ecconomy exept to improve it.

Next trip down the 1/4 I'm trying for a flat 13 (with new clutch and light flywheel), big ask for the 205's but it will be fun trying.

Originally posted by predator666

Well it isn't "stock" then is it...every little mod makes a difference.

kabab, you've gone off topic.

Last night you said a bone stock R33 GTS25T can pull low 13s, no exhaust, no boost, nothing, except slicks.

Considering Andrew was trapping at 95mph, with a couple of very minor mods, a 93-94mph trap speed has no hope in hell of pulling a low 13 second pass, even on slicks.

You say most of the R33s you see are running low 14s with crappy 60 foot times, don't forget, most of the guys here are running modified cars, not bone stockers. Nobody above has the said car.

I dont think any of the guys here think its possible either. That is all :D

Argh, this is a frustrating thread, so much misstruth's flying around.

Firstly Elf fuel will only give horsepower if the engine is tuned for the fuel. And the fuel will probably stuff up your oxygen sensor and cat and perhaps even rubber fuel lines.

Also a quicker 60 foot time will improve your trap speed, which is kind of obvious. if you get off to a better start then you have more track to gain speed. That being said a "stock" (No exhaust no mods full stop) will be lucky to get into the 13s, however one with full exhaust pod and somehow tuned for the elf fuel, with slicks would go close to a 13.3

Bab out of all people you should know better.

Throw in a tank of ELF on a stock R33 and watch how crap it will perform without touching a thing. Mainly because of the high density of the ELF fuel, it burns much slower, so running standard timing and fuel maps will run rich and crap. The reason they retune for racing fuel is advance the timing to ignite the mixture earlier so it has time to burn and have it burn complete for more power. It will produce more power because there is a greater force on the piston earlier and at high rpm it will ignite the mixture before TDC instead of later (with ignition lag obviously). So whack slicks and ELF in a bog stock R33 and it will go worse than another on street tyres.

Id say most people with these times just need a bit more practice at drag racing...ive been my few times and hell its not easy to launc hright, anybody can drive down the track, but to launch quick and quell wheelspin (like Merli's learning!!!) is very hard and takes a long time to get it right...

but then Merli's 13.1 was still hell impressive so congrats bruddah!

Finally, someone agrees with me that ELF will be useless unless you can do something with it... then by modifying the ECU it will no longer be a stock R33 GTS25T :D

I agree, bring on a demo... im not paying.. not my claim to prove ;)

Well, its not stock either (bleed valve for 9psi, no zorst, no pod, nothing else), but I ran 14.2 the other day. That was running on R tyres, so they are a fair bit stickier than regular, but not full slicks.

Unfortunately we did not get 60' times so I can't tell you if they were good or not. Trap speed was 96mph.

But this does seem to suggest you could get high 13s in a stocker with a great launch. I could only go to about 4000rpm off the line without significant wheelspin, so there is probably time to be made with better tyres.

Originally posted by Shell

if you want to find out the time of a stock R33, my car is available :D  

oh and my tyres are kinda due for replacement...does this count as slicks LOL :lol:

heh, she already offered. ;)

Sounds good Shell, wednesday week?

:burnout: :burnout: :burnout: :burnout:

exstaic ran a 13.8 with exhaust and s-afc running street tyres 10 12 psi I think mid 13's are possible may be a 13.4 babs is on the mark you dont need a bigger cooler unless you are fitting a bigger turbo in reality merli made reasoanble power witha stock cooler.

meggala

I ran a 13.9 at 101 mph at Eastern Creek on 4/12/2002. I have a sedan with 2 3/4 inch exhaust from cat back, pod filter with a cheap UAS partition and running 8psi. I can't run anymore boost due to spiking problems.

That day was really hot (36 celcius) and I had 5 runs. There was a group GTS T's together that day. During daylight none of us could break into the 13's or the 100 mph. There was 5 of us and we were doing from 14.1's - 15.1's at 93-96 mph. Would you believe as the sunset, these times did not really change ???.

On my last run after the sun had gone down I let my rear tyres down to 18psi, choose not to do a burn out as this only heats up the intercooler and ripped a 101 mph 13.9. I don't believe any of the other guys with GTS T's managed a 13 sec or 100+mph pass that day.

Unfortunately we were not getting our 60 ft times that day so I can't really compare 60 ft times to see whether that is where the difference was, although I'm pretty sure that the 13.9 would have been a result of a good 60 ft time.

Guest Skyline King

Guys.........

when TRY09s was 4ORCD (stock at first) it ran a 12.8 @113mph

it had a 3" exhaust ,pod filter,standard auto not manual,1 bar of boost and avgas and tolunene it ran those times with street rubber not slicks 1.8 60 foot.

exhausts make a HUGE difference to a skyline about 30-40bhp

and an air pod about 5-10bhp,most skylines don't like boost above 10psi as the ignition starts to detonate so hence the racing fuel,you can make 260bhp with these mods and tuning but as soon as you go back to std fuel and setup your looking at 140-160bhp.....hope this helps everyone....

thank you

mick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually, that's not entirely true. It's also the same motor in the 1st gen Nissan Cube but they're rare as hen's teeth.  
    • Yeah it is always worth testing and balancing actuators out of the box, just set the pressure regulator on a compressor very low (eg 5 psi) and increase it slowly to see when they both move.....unfortunately while you may be able to adjust the length of the actuator rod to minimise any difference, the actual pressure they move from is not adjustable so you need a well matched pair. And yes, the VCAM is probably contributing; the earlier in the rev range they come on boost and the slower the revs build (I think your demo was in 5th), the more you notice it.  Driving at WOT through 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc you will probably never hear it as any shuffling starts and is over super quickly
    • oh they were with that motor, you need to remove the engine to change the spark plugs (don't have to, but it does make it easier)
    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...