Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you were to upgrade the turbo on a 33 (or even running standard turbo) how much boost could you safely run?

The main reason I ask is because a mate said that the head gaskets on the 33's are crap and anything over 1 bar of boost and they can easily pop.

Is this true and is it common with both series1's and series 2's or did Nissan rectify this problem on the later series?

I would be looking to make about 250@wheels

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/79566-33gtst-how-much-boost-can-you-run/
Share on other sites

If you were to upgrade the turbo on a 33 (or even running standard turbo) how much boost could you safely run?

The main reason I ask is because a mate said that the head gaskets on the 33's are crap and anything over 1 bar of boost and they can easily pop.

Is this true and is it common with both series1's and series 2's or did Nissan rectify this problem on the later series?

I would be looking to make about 250@wheels

Thanks

There is nothing wrong with the standard head gasket people often go to a thicker head gasket when running high boost to lower the compression of the engine. From what I have heard 250@wheels should be fine with standard gasket with supporting mods injectors, fuel pump, ecu, turbo ect. Run no more than 10psi with the standard turbo as rule of thumb as the ceramic wheels are week. As for how much boost can I run if you are using an after market turbo it depends on what turbo you are talking about what mods you have ect.

agree with munna, you don't really want to push your standard turbo to hard i have heard you can run them safely 10psi and if you want to push it 12 - maybe 13 but thats pushing it a little. If you go the after market say a ball bearing as i have with all the bolt on bits eg. fmic, ecu, pod, injectors, fuel reg and pump i think you can push them up to about 16 - 18psi. Not 100% i am no expert just what i have heard on hear. At the monent i run 16psi on my R32 and thats pretty safe with out open the engine up for the other goodies

ohhh mate , easily run my car at 50psi on standard turbo

bloody goes great guns!!!

haha nah how bullshit was the game tonite !!!

i have to work tommorow ****!!

nah standard turbo man on r33 gtst run 10psi max to be safe, i have heard pplrunnin 12 and 15 but ya know depends how ya drive, and what ya do.

my car is tuned to run 8psi cause anythin over it ****in goes no where,

and is it 250 rear wheel kilowatts or horsepower.

cause horspower would be doable with a standard turbo

but kilowatts, mate you'll blow up the turbo b 4 gettin to there safely !!

anyway im gone, im takin my car down the quarter next weekend, with the manual conversion in

see how she goes! hope it doesnt fall apart !!

THannks ,

Baaazzz!!!

250rwkw is not do-able on a standard turbo, injectors and management.

I was simply refering to the fact the RB25 will make that power without having head gasket issues, which was asked about above.

Who would waste time with a standard turbo in the hunt for power anyway. :D

I have a standard turbo, with and apexi pfc FMIC, and full custom exhaust.

Car is running 12psi, been like that for about 12 months plus, and I am always on boost (hence me fueling up alot :cheers: ) turbo is fine.

The head gasket is not what you have to worry about its the ceramic turbine in the stock turbo that is the weakest link when it comes to boosting up the psi. I would run 10psi to be safe but have heard still some people blowing there turbs at that pressure so it up to you if you want to risk it. Best bet if you want that power figure is to get a new turbo or high flow it to be safe. This topic has been discussed heaps on the forum do a search.

i run around .9-1 bar on my stock turbo.. after 140k's no shaft play on turbo and wheels arent warped neither are the housing. I run it on .5-.6 bar to put around town tho. around 1 bar is only for short spurts. I have some sort of engine management to keep the AF's in a great line :Dj:

agree with munna

Yeh true... but on another subject... 'Your Signature'

Dude... Although 210 Rwkw sounds correct.. I'm pretty sure your not getting 729Nm of Torque God dam!!!! lol Unless your running 24+ pound boost 'in which you wouldn’t only be getting 210 rwkw'

so stock turbo aside.....the first part of the quiestion was "If you were to UPGRADE the turbo on a 33 how much boost can it hold"??

this is something i'd be keen to hear about myself, being i'm currently running a Hi-flow turbo on my 33 @ 18-20 psi....how far can I go before the head gasket gives way? i know short one off dyno runs an stuff it can handle a fair bit off boost, but what about with full boost being used for greater amounts of time...like say circuit racing or drifting?

:cheers:

Ive been running 12-13psi boost on stock turbo for the last year and still has no shaft play and never had a hickup.

I do have HKS Cams though so weather that has contributed to its longevity in pissing off exhaust through a straight through 3.5" turbo back with high flow cat *shrugs*

But i just bought a Highflowed TO4e :)

So if it blows i will let yous know how much boost i could squeeze in :cheers:

Not reading it wrong buddy on my dyno graph it has 2 lines kw and toq and in the top right corner it tells me max rwkw and it tells me max touque so hate to dissappoint you but i do have 729nm. I have a pretty big turbo on my car would that help such high reading it is a GT30 ballbearing the guy that i bought it off said it is good for 650hp+

Not reading it wrong buddy on my dyno graph it has 2 lines kw and toq and in the top right corner it tells me max rwkw and it tells me max touque so hate to dissappoint you but i do have 729nm. I have a pretty big turbo on my car would that help such high reading it is a GT30 ballbearing the guy that i bought it off said it is good for 650hp+

I'm not car or torque expert I just thought this doesnt sound right out of my common sense. A ford FPV GT makes around 550 Nm T at the flywheel I believe, this is from a 5.7L V8 which is very torquey & i think it makes around 300 kw at the fly also. Now lets guestimate you have around 270 Kw (210 rwkw + 60kw drive train loss) at your fly on a 2L engine only running 16psi. Like I said, I dont know what the exact equations are for torque figures but I certainly know that 729 Nm T! is a absolute shit load for a 2L engine running under 20 pound. I mean stock Mercs V8 Supercharged cars make around this figure. A Holden Monaro with a Twin Turbo kit makes around 850 Nm T, so a 2L running 16 pound making 729 Nm T just doesn’t sound right to me.

Anybody else who actually knows more about torgue figures please but in? Where SK when you need him... He'd set things straight. 'regardless whos right or wrong'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...