Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There seems to be a lot of threads lot on what would win stock for stock for 0-400m and 0-100kmph. So I decided to make this list as a bit of a guide. Sources vary but I tried to take the manufactures claimed times were possible.

I will update it from time to time.

0-100kmph 0-400m

NISSAN

R34 GTT 6.2 14.2

R33 GTS25T 6.18 14.4

R32 GTST 6.5 14.8

GTR

R32 4.7 13

R33 4.9 13.2

R34 4.9 13.1

300ZX Z32 TT 2Seater 5.6 14.2

Silvia S13/180sx

CA18DET 6.9 15

SR20DET 6.2 14.5

S15 Jap spec 5.5 13.8

TOYOTA

MR2 GT 6.12 14.37

Soarer SC400 2.5TT 7 15.1

Soarer SC400 V8 8.9 16.5

Supra RZ 5.92 13.93

Supra SZ 6.6 14.9

Mazda RX7

86-88 Turbo 6.8 14.4

89-91 Turbo 6.5 14.4

95 Twin Turbo 5.2 14.0

Mitsubishi

99 magna V6 8.2 16.2

Holden

VN V6 man 7.9 15.68

VP V6 man 8 15.5

VR V6 auto 9.3 16.8

VN SS 7.4 15.24

VS SS 7.34 15.27

VT SS Gen3 6.4 14.4

VX SS 6.23 14.35

VY SS S1 5.8 14.24

VY SS S2 5.8 13.94

VZ SS 5.82 13.99

HSV

VP GTS 7.2 15.2

VR GTS 6.6 14.8

VX clubsport 5.7 13.9

VX GTS 300 5.1 13.3

VY Clubsport S2 5.3 13.5

Subaru

99 WRX 5.91 14.12

03 WRX 5.8 14

03 STI 5.43 13.62

Ford

EB2 6 9.3 16.8

EL 6 8.9 16.8

AU 6 8.8 16.3

EL XR8 7.5 15.5

BA XR8 6.1 14.1

BA XR6T 5.9 14.1

FPV

Typhoon F6 5.7 14.0

GT 5.9 14.2

Edited by Munna
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/80479-0-100-and-0-400m-times/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No mate. Drag is just dull unless the topfuel/doorslammer cars are running. I CBF hurting my car that way.

RWD's, I know of a slicked up GTSt that runs 10's so it would take me to 100 :P but most of the guys out there are running Jap suspension that just won't grip for the quarter. Even mine is too hard for the launch but good for circuit. Low to mid fives on street rubber is the best I'd expect from a T that is really well sorted as they have to balance revs/boost and wheelspin is just too easy to get.

0-100 4.5 damn best I can manage is 5.2.
It was in the cheater GTR though. Pretty stock but 260rwkw due to boost and fuel reg. Pretty easy to do and not hard on the gear. I use 5500rpm and feed throttle while I slip the clutch. Was a real buzz.

5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

It was in the cheater GTR though. Pretty stock but 260rwkw due to boost and fuel reg. Pretty easy to do and not hard on the gear. I use 5500rpm and feed throttle while I slip the clutch. Was a real buzz.

 

5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

Ahh cheeter 4wd wish I had one. Id find it very hard to do 5.2's consistantly with my rwd

Does anyone rate the Gtech for 0-100/0-400 times? I know they can't be exact - but are the newer versions pretty close to the money?

I do... MY 0-100 time on the g-tech was 4.8 seconds....

My 1/4 mile time was 13.3 seconds...

First time at willowbank raceway i got 13.7 and by the third run i had 13.23 @101

So i reckon the g-tech is pretty acurate (not as good as the real thing of course but its a great indication....

I do... MY 0-100 time on the g-tech was 4.8 seconds....

My 1/4 mile time was 13.3 seconds...

First time at willowbank raceway i got 13.7 and by the third run i had 13.23 @101

So i reckon the g-tech is pretty acurate (not as good as the real thing of course but its a great indication....

just brought one off ebay for $45 the early gtech pro model so when I get it I will let who all know how I go. I will lend it to a few of my mates with quick cars to and compare and list the results.

Nice effort Munna.

Where's my car? :O

I think the Gtech is quite accurrate however some runs may be questionable.

I did a few runs a couple weeks ago. Most were flat 5 but managed one of 4.57 so I doubted it a bit. Haven't taken car out again to confirm.

When it was stock the gtech did produce times which were similar to manufacturer times so I wouldn't say it's impossible to achieve the same results.

Gtech's are great if you want to see if your mods make much difference to the car. My times didn't change after getting the CAT back so it was useless besides the sound, however after getting a tune it gave me a smile.

  • 2 weeks later...
I think your wrong on the r32 gtst 6.9 claim.

In the japanese import buyers guide, the test results of 0-100 times for even an AUTO r32 gts t was 6.89 seconds, and if this was manual the tester expected low 6 second times.

Yep thanks mate did some more research and the time I had was probably for an auto. Found a couple of sites which claim around 6.5 and 14.8.

cheers

  • 3 weeks later...
5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

Best I managed in the R32 with the Rb20DET was 5.2, it was consistent and easy to launch.

The RB30DET.. :P Initially I lost 1 whole sec, 6.2, zero traction in first, second is fine providing the change is smooth.

I've since managed to get it down to 5.9secs, the trick was not to over-rev it, change at 5100rpm and its fine. lol, damn small turbo. :huh:

6.9 0-100 for the R32 I think is on the money. Mine was damn slow when 100% stock and making 115rwkw. :blink:

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I transferred from full time service to Army Reserve, so I still have access, work has been super keen to get me in to work in the OPS realm, so just turning up to use the gym......and ovens, isn't causing any issues, apart from me needing to keep on telling them that I won't be doing any reserve days until I get my joint in Goulburn sorted  Basically I can now work whenever I want, for how long I want now, and it's all tax free Next time we have some fires or floods you might see me covered in mud, or cutting sick in some plant equipment cleaning up, the Reserves love getting in the news, LOL
    • Final finish outcome of 80°c was typical to the pics, I've turned the oven down to 50°c and will pick them up after the gym tomorrow  The before and after difference was amazing, the wrinkle paint has covered all of the casting marks completely It did take a couple of hours to key it all and get in all of the crevices, but, for me it was time well spent for the final outcome, but I have all the time in the world to do it at the moment  Ended up with 4 coats, each sprayed at different angles to get optimal coverage and thickness As for the fixtures and intake box thingo that hasn't made it, the supplier is apparently posting the fixtures, and, are now sending a different CAI that is in stock The replacement CAI is actually better than what I originally ordered, but will require a pod filter that locates under the front bar, still serviceable, but it basically removes the whole OEM filter box and ducts into the front bar, so filter cleaning will require ramps and the removal of some front bar undertray, not a war stopper, just some ramps and an additional 10 minutes work every few months From looking at it it is made from alloy pipe from the throttle body, through the CAI hole in the rad support, then right turning under the bar, luckily the wrinkle paint was on special and I got 2 cans for $30ish, so the alloy will get the same wrinkle treatment as the intake manifold, hopefully it turns up soon, either way, the car will be getting booked in soon, if the parts aren't here, I'll just get MX5 Mania to " make it work"  
    • I'm so glad base security is so high. I see they stopped some random codger from being able to just wander in off the street... 😛   PS, intake looks good!
    • So far so good, another hour and their done
    • Exactly how each part works and how they all work together to make the engine function. That's all I'd need to do a basic build. Maybe how forced induction works. I probably need to learn some of the maths behind it all as well.
×
×
  • Create New...