Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Clutch has apparently died in my R32 GT-R so its time to do a switcheroo. Whilst its all apart it might be worthwhile adding a lightened flywheel.

So does anyone have a lightened flywheel for an R32 GT-R (1989 model: can never remember if they are push or pull) sitting around that they want to sell? Alternatively, does if anyone knows of some good deals lemme know.

;)

Lucien.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/81597-r32-gt-r-flywheel/
Share on other sites

Push or pull doesn't matter to the flywheel but for reference the 89 should be a push clutch.

We can supply a brand new Fidanza flywheel which is l/weight ( approx 4.5kg ) alloy with a replaceable steel insert.

It is also a pretty purple and is $660 incl plus freight

Cheers

ken

lucien have you driven a car with a light flywheel on the road? the reduction in torque at low revs is noticable.....

High duncan,

No, I have not had the pleasure, I have only read other people's experiences (which are overwhelmingly positive, but you wouldn't expect them to be too critical of their decision having just shelled out $500+ :huh:).

Does the faster revving, in your experience, mitigate some of the torque loss at low revs? Not worth the tradeoff?

  • 2 months later...

I'm in the same situation at the moment.. clutch needs replacing 'cause it's stuffed and I'm thinking about doing the lightened flywheel at the same time.

Since the car is a daily driver more than anything else I really didn't want to go under 5kg. UAS have one at 6kg but I called them up today and they said they won't have any for a few months (at best).

I can't be bothered waiting that long so I'm considering the option of just machining the stock one down a bit.. maybe shave off a kilo or so. Don't really know what a safe limit is but I'll get someone that knows what they're doing to do it.

Anyone else have their opinions on this?

I bough the car with a stock flywheel in, and changed to a lightened one, got sick of it. As Duncan says driving around town its annoying. Anything under 2,000rpm and my car would shudder... I changed back to a stock flywheel and am glad i did. Car is much nicer to drive with the stock flywheel.

I never noticed a speed increase in reving, but that would probably because i fitted a twinplate with my lightened flywheel, so the twin plate+lightened flywheel probably weighed the same as the single+stock flywheel.

My advice? Save your money, keep the stock flywheel (get it machined if it needs it obviously). Jim Berry told me the same thing - said the Japs usualy get it right with thier flywheels, they are a good weight. Being turbo cars we need to keep the rpm spooling, if it was a torque monstor down low, then maybe consider a lightened flywheel.

Hope this helps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
×
×
  • Create New...