Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You just have to think of technology in general and how Japan are the world leaders in technology, producing the best tv's, etc. And I would imagine that superiority would continue in their car manufacturing. Compare this to Australias technology and it's quite embarrassing. This is what keeps me away from the Holden. Japan's far too superior.

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've owned a VS 5ltr 5speed.

Spent a little on the motor & suspension only to have the stock gearbox pop, stock diff pop and the rear IRS subframe split from one of the diff mounts like a can opener attacked it. Simply looking at the design of the VS IRS rear end to that of the Nissan R32/R33 rear end you can see how the Nissans rear end looks that much tougher.

It was fine for a daily commuter but anything more and it simply broke.

The Nissan I now own has taken a beating so much more abuse and simply holds together, even with an extra 72% more power. 3years later and 120,000km's the only parts I've 'had' to replace due to breakage (not consumables such as clutches, brakes etc) is a radiator top tank, clutch master and slave cylinder, a few heater hoses which is to be expected with 188,000km's on the clock.

Things may be different now.. I don't know how current gen commodore driveline, diff's and chassis hold up to more power than stock.

Some of you may think that Holden are behind the times but when you think about it, how much do you actualy know about the product - **** all. The technology that Holden use, not only mechanical wise but safety wise aswell is on par with the best of them.

and as for power. the new 6.0litre engine with an exhaust, CAI and computer upgrade will prodcue in excess of 290rwkw and thats only spending between 3-4k on modifications. No turbo lag, Plenty of bottom end torque, plenty of top end torque.  

On the other hand a customer of mine has a new 6.0litre Senator with a twin turbo kit fitted to it 10psi = over 400rwkw.... Try acheive that on the same amount of boost out of an RB25 or whatever.  

Dont get me wrong at all. I love my turbo cars aswell but I think that alot of people need to broaden their prospective and look at what Holden is produceing. If anything you have to take pride in it because its an AUSTRALIAN built car - Made by AUSTRALIANS.

Holden means a great deal to Australia.

LoL! But not the Monaro apparently. All though it IS better than those souped up family sedans that are passed of as "sports cars"

In terms of Aussie cars, theres nothing to be proud of really, can't stand Fords n Holdens.......actually the XR6T Typhoon ain't too bad. It's just the aussie mentality of "v8 mate" is annoying. It's like, upgrade already.

ok what I was going on with was all too long.

Lets just say my significant experience in the international world of quality engineering and manufacturing is at complete odds with your opinions.

I commend you both on your parochialism and agree that we need those companies and their local product but they are not shining examples of quality or engineering excellence.

If you are limited by racing class to a specific package there is no sense complaining. Your choice to race right? After all the money spent to develop the alloytech they gained little power, refinement, or economy. Wankers. Even the press have been slagging the boat anchor down. Renault developed a much nicer package in their V6.

Back on topic, after the nostril debacle I am just happy to see the back of a car with some potential but gone well off the mark.

The VS went fairly well after a few mods. That was the end of the road for it unless I wanted to go a huge fuel swallowing cam or forced induction.

I'd say the VS was as quick as my R32 once the R32 was making around 150rwkw.

That is Exhaust and 12.5psi from the R32.

As an insider working for Holden... You should see whats coming out when the VE commodore comes out.... It will make the FPV Typhoon look like a Barina....Shhhhh cant say

Jesus!!

the VE will make the Typhoon look like a Barina?!

so will the great aussie people mover crack the 2000kg mark?

it's no wonder they need a dirty great 6.0L of displacement to move the bugger around!

:thumbsup:

Heath,

You not referring to the VE GTS that only 0.5% of the population can afford are you? Or are you referring to a twin turbo torana that's all hearsay? LS2 in the VE v8's are pretty definate however will be detuned. Can't see nothing that will make the Typhoon look like a barina especially when the 6 speed auto comes out.

Get ready ppl, fly those Ozzie flag:)

...It's just the aussie mentality of "v8 mate" is annoying. It's like, upgrade already.

See thats funny, not being a smart a55 but its the same as some ppls mentality of either Jap or nothing. Look at the Skyline / Nissan range and think about the number of uninspiring engines they use, SOHC engines etc.

If i had a job that readily gave me a company car...then id gladly have taken a Monaro. :P

So what if its a pushrod V8. Does anyone know what they actually weigh being all alloy compared to the cast iron block RB engines? If you read up on the LS1/2 engines, you will find out why they didnt continue with the LT5, or use some of other quad cam V8s that they make and sell in Oldsmobile/Pontiac etc.

There are design reasons as well as cost reasons, and you only have to look at the peformance of the things to realise they arent really hurting on that front. (and seriously look at the economy these things get, they are surprisingly good...its amazing when you consider the weight they have pull around, with weight being the worst enemy of economy)

The chassis that these engines are put in arent that great, but the Monaro was one of the better chassis housing the engine:(

It aint cheap, but consider what a 2003/4 GTR would have cost you...

44886973.Car21_069.JPG

44886909.Car21_007.JPG

Then take the above, add a cam and exhaust with remapped ECU, some shocks and springs, thats all...thats all you need to on road legal semi slicks to run 1:51s at Eastern Creek. Which is bloody fast

Consider the new HSV Dealer Team Spec Clubsports lap Oran Short Circuit in 48.2 seconds on road legal rubber, completely off the showroom floor and according to road tests at Oran Park t put up with all the abuse given to it with brakes/temps etc all being stable:) They will soon be optioned with Ohlins adjustable suspension...imagine how quick they will be then:)

Then consider SAU's fastest GTR around Oran Park Short Circuit, an R32 with 25/40 turbos, hks mainifolds, hks dump pipes, 044 fuel pumps, cams, cam gears, head ported, forged pistons, rods, dog box and 340 kw at all four wheels with road legal rubber and fully sorted suspension and big aftermarket brakes does 47.6seconds

LOL...if you look around there are plenty of reasons why not to sling sh1t on Holdens/Monaros/V8s etc:) Imagine a last hoorah Monaro on a diet with the Ohlins and rest of the Dealer Team Spec options:whackit:

Well... Won't I be scouring the LS web sites looking for your car and mods. hehe :P

 

If the pic isn't a photochop.. Awesome.  

Nothing better than big cubes + forced induction.

 

There's no replacement for displacement.. :)

You won't need to cubes as the answer was already posted in another thread in this forum. If I had forced induction I would be pulling much more than what I have now. If there was no insurance, drivetrain complications, or warranty issues then I would get one now. I have to wait 2.5 years before I would be serious about it.

Yeah it's a photochop courtesy of one of the skyline images I stole from this forum :D

They are obviously a completely different car to that of the old VS. :P

I used to jack the car up and once accidently opened the car door. I wasn't able to close the door until I dropped the car back on the ground as the chassis twisted a good 10mm and the door latch no longer lined up. :)

Reading the manual it stated 'do not open the car door while the car is jacked up' lol

I think people should appreciate all kinds of cars and get over the badge thing. Mock the OHV all you want but it's the end result that counts. I see people mocking Monaro's/Commo's/Falcons but what about a Z06 Corvette? It uses a LS1 and now a LS2 motor. That's a capable car in itself.

Porsche up until recently (the 993 incarnations of the 911) were running SOHC 2 valves per cylinder. That's very low tech compared to a Nissan of the same era with DOHC and 4 valves/cylinder. Porsche still use strut suspension setup, compared to double wishbones on Skylines up front and multi-links on the rear. Which one handles and grips better?

Like I said, appreciate all cars in all colors and formats, and get over the badge/name thing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...