Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Joey, there's a joint in Moorebank called "Flame Coatings" that do industrial stuff, I spoke to them and they can do car parts, you just need to take it to them so they can see it to quote.

Might be worth a look.

  • 3 weeks later...

Gave them a bell Mark, they quoted me around $500 for 1.5m of 4 inch dump, exhaust Manifold and turbine housing..seems fair

That's without doing the gate pipes, I don't think there's any real gains to be had by doing the gate pipes as I don't think there will be any sort of restriction to flow there.

Thoughts?

I would wrap them for the heat, I would coat and wrap everything anyway as I feel that the lower the engine compartment temps the better.

As long as the bits are not stainless.

Have you fixed yours yet?

The 5 might get to stretch it legs soon as I'm hoping to do Huntley on 01 Feb.

Picking the engine up soon :)

The dump and pipes are stainless, am I missing something here?? Should I not do them?

That's mad, you will have to tell me how you go.. If love to do that hill climb eventually :D

Due to its metallurgy stainless tends to work harden and crack, dependant on its quality and engineering.

This usually will only happen where the heat is most extreme and there's some form of engineering issue like tight bends, seams or if it is bearing weight.

The coatings should be fine but I wouldn't wrap stainless.

I've had 2 stainless manifolds in my time and about 20 steel, only 2 have cracked, and they weren't the steel ones.

The initial one I got for the old boat lasted 1 track day before it cracked at the turbo mounting plate, I had it fixed and then it cracked along the pipe of one of the runners.

That's when I had that pretty steam pipe one made up through unigroup, that never had a issue and glowed like the fires of hell on lots of occasions.

Plus steel is cheap and lasts for years anyway.

Do you the the feeling I don't like stainless exhaust manifolds.

Then again I may have just been unlucky and inferior materials were used???????

Definitely getting the feeling you don't like stainless haha

The manifold is a full race steam pipe manifold so that should be ok to coat along with the turbine housing

I'm gonna give the guy would built the gate pipes and dump pipe a call and see what he reckons though i shouldn't have any dramas coating them as they won't see the same temps as the manifold

Am I right in saying that??

Has anyone seen the stainless actually crack or it crack along the seam weld? I have only ever seen them crack in the welds.

Frankly depending on what manifold it is I wouldn't have a problem wrapping them as long as you put some thought into it. Every cracked manifold I have seen has been a tubular manifold with welds with no/poor/inconsistent weld penetration. Never seen a manifold made from stainless pipe (vs tube) crack. The wall thickness is the cheap insurance and reason why people have far less issues with mild steel. IMO stainless is actually superior if done right

Full race manifolds are basically a stainless steam pipe

If you compare it to a china manifold, while it might be 2.8-3.1mm thick, the way they are made vary greatly, they are mig'd then a tig is run over to make it look like its been tig'd. Penetration varies and hot spots cant be seen as they "polish" them.

I would coat the lot.

I would even coat the exhaust all the way to the rear muffler. The heat off even the cat back section increases cabin temps, if you have carpet it will start to deteriorate the carpet just in front of your passenger seat on the hump for the cat. Even if it hasn't had a cat for 10 years! If you plan to track your car or drive in Sydney on 35deg + days its a no brainer, might cost an extra $80 since they can only do the outside but will reduce radiated heat

Seen heaps of jap manifolds crack at the welds, its prob 99% of where I have seen cracks. Im not an expert on welding and can only do enough to get me by. If I had to say 1 reason, is because they are not really that thick and the weight of the turbo/gate/poorly hung exhaust cracks it or a combo of both.

I have just finished a turbo swap where I had to mod a dump pipe that was wrapped on top half only. As seen in pic it was cooked to the point of shedding layers on the inside and outside. Had to remove 3 layers before it was able to be welded.

It's mild steel Btw. I definitely wouldn't wrap anything.

post-82728-0-87268300-1420493145_thumb.jpg

I use VHT paint prior to wrapping, this negates the corrosion.

The way I see it is if wrapping/lagging is good enough for heavy plant and ships its good enough for my car.

As for the dump that corroded, was it painted prior to wrapping, and what did it cost, I would guess it wasn't painted and it would have cost about $80 for a new one to be fabricated.

I do agree that high quality stainless pipe with good engineering should out last the life of the car.

I do agree that high quality stainless pipe with good engineering should out last the life of the car.

There's a BIG difference between "high quality stainless pipe" and the typical stainless tube that is used for making exhaust components. Especially those that come from ChinaBay. Most stainless grades that are specified as being used in those sorts of products are probably a long way from the adulterated crap that they actually get made from.

With respect to lagging of industrial pipework and so on....there's almost no applications in industry where something like an exhaust manifold or turbo dump would be exposed to 700-900°C gases flowing on the inside an be wrapped on the outside. We just don't do that sort of crap. If it is going to run that hot on the inside we will use refractory lining (fire bricks for the layman) of some sort to serve as the first line of protection. Refractory will serve to keep the hot gases off the metal and act as an insulator. The steel might still end up running at a surface temperature of 150 - 400°C (depending on what and where we're talking about), but at least it's not in direct contact with the hot gases.

Where (really) hot gases absolutely have to be in contact directly with the metal, then there is no way that external insulation will be used. Lagging hides mechanical failures.

thanks lads, I took it down to see Abdul from flamed coatings... seems like a really genuine guy so im gonna go ahead and use him.

Going to get the gate pipes done as well, as discussed I don't think it will make much of the way in performance gains but im really only trying to stop the radiating heat.

Sucram im just doing up to the cat for the moment, then once its running again ill get the rest of the system done. Im also getting the gate itself done (not the diapgram part) but the part where the gasses flow,once again to reduce radiating heat.

cheers for the help

Always a tough question. The big fear is that any internal coating that comes off might cause nasty damage to the turbine. Of course, it might not do any damage. What might trash a ceramic turbine might not scratch an inconel one.

I think the general concensus amongst guys who do coatings is that they'd relatively happy to coat the inside of brand new housings that haven't had a chance to be impregnated with carbon and impurities. Less happy with used housings. By the same token, that could just be paranoia and maybe there are guys out there who have coated heaps of used ones without any problem at all.

I do know that for the ceramic coatings I've looked at getting applied to industrial burner components, the first step is to make sure the (brand new 253MA or inconel) parts are scrupulously clean. Washed to within an inch of their lives. That's bright, clean shiny alloy, not old, grody cast iron.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...