Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Joey, there's a joint in Moorebank called "Flame Coatings" that do industrial stuff, I spoke to them and they can do car parts, you just need to take it to them so they can see it to quote.

Might be worth a look.

  • 3 weeks later...

Gave them a bell Mark, they quoted me around $500 for 1.5m of 4 inch dump, exhaust Manifold and turbine housing..seems fair

That's without doing the gate pipes, I don't think there's any real gains to be had by doing the gate pipes as I don't think there will be any sort of restriction to flow there.

Thoughts?

I would wrap them for the heat, I would coat and wrap everything anyway as I feel that the lower the engine compartment temps the better.

As long as the bits are not stainless.

Have you fixed yours yet?

The 5 might get to stretch it legs soon as I'm hoping to do Huntley on 01 Feb.

Picking the engine up soon :)

The dump and pipes are stainless, am I missing something here?? Should I not do them?

That's mad, you will have to tell me how you go.. If love to do that hill climb eventually :D

Due to its metallurgy stainless tends to work harden and crack, dependant on its quality and engineering.

This usually will only happen where the heat is most extreme and there's some form of engineering issue like tight bends, seams or if it is bearing weight.

The coatings should be fine but I wouldn't wrap stainless.

I've had 2 stainless manifolds in my time and about 20 steel, only 2 have cracked, and they weren't the steel ones.

The initial one I got for the old boat lasted 1 track day before it cracked at the turbo mounting plate, I had it fixed and then it cracked along the pipe of one of the runners.

That's when I had that pretty steam pipe one made up through unigroup, that never had a issue and glowed like the fires of hell on lots of occasions.

Plus steel is cheap and lasts for years anyway.

Do you the the feeling I don't like stainless exhaust manifolds.

Then again I may have just been unlucky and inferior materials were used???????

Definitely getting the feeling you don't like stainless haha

The manifold is a full race steam pipe manifold so that should be ok to coat along with the turbine housing

I'm gonna give the guy would built the gate pipes and dump pipe a call and see what he reckons though i shouldn't have any dramas coating them as they won't see the same temps as the manifold

Am I right in saying that??

Has anyone seen the stainless actually crack or it crack along the seam weld? I have only ever seen them crack in the welds.

Frankly depending on what manifold it is I wouldn't have a problem wrapping them as long as you put some thought into it. Every cracked manifold I have seen has been a tubular manifold with welds with no/poor/inconsistent weld penetration. Never seen a manifold made from stainless pipe (vs tube) crack. The wall thickness is the cheap insurance and reason why people have far less issues with mild steel. IMO stainless is actually superior if done right

Full race manifolds are basically a stainless steam pipe

If you compare it to a china manifold, while it might be 2.8-3.1mm thick, the way they are made vary greatly, they are mig'd then a tig is run over to make it look like its been tig'd. Penetration varies and hot spots cant be seen as they "polish" them.

I would coat the lot.

I would even coat the exhaust all the way to the rear muffler. The heat off even the cat back section increases cabin temps, if you have carpet it will start to deteriorate the carpet just in front of your passenger seat on the hump for the cat. Even if it hasn't had a cat for 10 years! If you plan to track your car or drive in Sydney on 35deg + days its a no brainer, might cost an extra $80 since they can only do the outside but will reduce radiated heat

Seen heaps of jap manifolds crack at the welds, its prob 99% of where I have seen cracks. Im not an expert on welding and can only do enough to get me by. If I had to say 1 reason, is because they are not really that thick and the weight of the turbo/gate/poorly hung exhaust cracks it or a combo of both.

I have just finished a turbo swap where I had to mod a dump pipe that was wrapped on top half only. As seen in pic it was cooked to the point of shedding layers on the inside and outside. Had to remove 3 layers before it was able to be welded.

It's mild steel Btw. I definitely wouldn't wrap anything.

post-82728-0-87268300-1420493145_thumb.jpg

I use VHT paint prior to wrapping, this negates the corrosion.

The way I see it is if wrapping/lagging is good enough for heavy plant and ships its good enough for my car.

As for the dump that corroded, was it painted prior to wrapping, and what did it cost, I would guess it wasn't painted and it would have cost about $80 for a new one to be fabricated.

I do agree that high quality stainless pipe with good engineering should out last the life of the car.

I do agree that high quality stainless pipe with good engineering should out last the life of the car.

There's a BIG difference between "high quality stainless pipe" and the typical stainless tube that is used for making exhaust components. Especially those that come from ChinaBay. Most stainless grades that are specified as being used in those sorts of products are probably a long way from the adulterated crap that they actually get made from.

With respect to lagging of industrial pipework and so on....there's almost no applications in industry where something like an exhaust manifold or turbo dump would be exposed to 700-900°C gases flowing on the inside an be wrapped on the outside. We just don't do that sort of crap. If it is going to run that hot on the inside we will use refractory lining (fire bricks for the layman) of some sort to serve as the first line of protection. Refractory will serve to keep the hot gases off the metal and act as an insulator. The steel might still end up running at a surface temperature of 150 - 400°C (depending on what and where we're talking about), but at least it's not in direct contact with the hot gases.

Where (really) hot gases absolutely have to be in contact directly with the metal, then there is no way that external insulation will be used. Lagging hides mechanical failures.

thanks lads, I took it down to see Abdul from flamed coatings... seems like a really genuine guy so im gonna go ahead and use him.

Going to get the gate pipes done as well, as discussed I don't think it will make much of the way in performance gains but im really only trying to stop the radiating heat.

Sucram im just doing up to the cat for the moment, then once its running again ill get the rest of the system done. Im also getting the gate itself done (not the diapgram part) but the part where the gasses flow,once again to reduce radiating heat.

cheers for the help

Always a tough question. The big fear is that any internal coating that comes off might cause nasty damage to the turbine. Of course, it might not do any damage. What might trash a ceramic turbine might not scratch an inconel one.

I think the general concensus amongst guys who do coatings is that they'd relatively happy to coat the inside of brand new housings that haven't had a chance to be impregnated with carbon and impurities. Less happy with used housings. By the same token, that could just be paranoia and maybe there are guys out there who have coated heaps of used ones without any problem at all.

I do know that for the ceramic coatings I've looked at getting applied to industrial burner components, the first step is to make sure the (brand new 253MA or inconel) parts are scrupulously clean. Washed to within an inch of their lives. That's bright, clean shiny alloy, not old, grody cast iron.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1680, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...