Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, well it is 2 tank fulls later (800k's) and I can safely say replacing the lambda sensor made no diference what so ever to the fuel economy. It definitely runs nicer, doesn't hesitate when full throttle is applied after long periods of idling (damn Sydney traffic) and cruising. But fuel ecomomy is totally unchanged.

Gotta get that exhaust on and tune it up some more on the dyno. Just need a spare few hours.

:( cheers :)

  • 9 months later...
Nissan recommends changing them every 40,000k's. They don't "wear out" in a mechanical sense. They just get contaminated and don't read the A/F ratios properly.

Interesting to say the least. So how do you know when to replace them? It's not cheap enough just to do it for the sake of it.

How sensitive are they to being knocked around. A friend dropped his once on the bench and it would not work properly after that. I recently dropped mine while doing the dump pipe upgrade - How do I know it is still working?

Would really be interested to know how they work internally?

They use some sort of chemical reaction to create a voltage once they are at the right temperature (which is why they have heater wires as well) THe chemicals get tired after a while and dont work anymore.

The best way to tell if its stuffed is to use a consult cable to monitor the voltage, stuffed ones read 0 or jump around at odd times. Unfortunately working ones jump around a bit too so it is hard to tell if it is dying unless you have a gtr (2 sensors so you can compare voltage)

  • 1 month later...

I took my car out to CRD to get tuned a week ago - they told me my o2 sensor was stuffed and told me a new one would cost $300+ as well as labour charge.

I get <200kms from a tank, if the o2 sensor was stuffed when they tuned it, does that mean it needs tuning again when i put my new o2 sensor in? or does the wide band one they use for tuning mean that it would have been tuned nicely anyway?

If i replace a stuffed o2 sensor should i immediately see an improvement in fuel economy?

Does anyone have an online link to buy an o2 sensor online? to save me a trip to repco...

And is their any adavantage to buying the genuine nissan part as opposed to the falcon part?

i have a falcon one and it works fine, no problems.

Thanks terminal - im thinking i will try to get a genuine part, or at least one that i dont have to change the wires on, would cost me more to get someone to change the falcon one over than it would to spend the extra on the genuine part.

I am taking it that all of this advice is relevant to R33 gts-t owners, not specifically stageas?

Thanks terminal - im thinking i will try to get a genuine part, or at least one that i dont have to change the wires on, would cost me more to get someone to change the falcon one over than it would to spend the extra on the genuine part.

I am taking it that all of this advice is relevant to R33 gts-t owners, not specifically stageas?

The Falcon lambda sensor I used cost $78 from Repco. last time I checked the genuine Nissan one was $180. I don't think anyone is going to charge you $102 to swap over a plug, it's a 10 minute job.

:) Cheers :P

The Falcon lambda sensor I used cost $78 from Repco. last time I checked the genuine Nissan one was $180. I don't think anyone is going to charge you $102 to swap over a plug, it's a 10 minute job.

:) Cheers :)

Change of plan

I bought a falcon sensor from Repco i think it only cost me $58 (hope its the right one)

The auto elec is charging me about $70 to fit it... It was going to be a 2 week wait for the genuine nissan part.

Quick question, can the power FC be tuned with a faulty o2 sensor? i.e. does the wide band sensor they stick in the exhaust mean that it doenst matter about the faulty one up front?

The reason i ask this is because i just paid for my car to be tuned, and when i rang up complaining about fuel issues they told me my o2 sensor was buggered... So did they tune it right and the new sensor will fix my problems? or did i get ripped off?

Change of plan

I bought a falcon sensor from Repco i think it only cost me $58 (hope its the right one)

The auto elec is charging me about $70 to fit it... It was going to be a 2 week wait for the genuine nissan part.

Quick question, can the power FC be tuned with a faulty o2 sensor? i.e. does the wide band sensor they stick in the exhaust mean that it doenst matter about the faulty one up front?

The reason i ask this is because i just paid for my car to be tuned, and when i rang up complaining about fuel issues they told me my o2 sensor was buggered... So did they tune it right and the new sensor will fix my problems? or did i get ripped off?

Depends on what fuel issues you were complaining about, all the tuning under load they'd have used their Wideband O2 for, and your factory narrowband isn't part of the equation. But if your mixtures are wrong under light load and idle, and the Power FC is setup to use closed loop with the factory narrowband, then a stuffed one would be a problem yep.

How do you mean you've got fuel issues?

Depends on what fuel issues you were complaining about, all the tuning under load they'd have used their Wideband O2 for, and your factory narrowband isn't part of the equation. But if your mixtures are wrong under light load and idle, and the Power FC is setup to use closed loop with the factory narrowband, then a stuffed one would be a problem yep.

How do you mean you've got fuel issues?

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

Then they could be talking about lack of closed loop control giving you poor cruise/idle fuel economy(due to stuffed O2). Generally in a full tune, they would input fuel values for all conditions that were close to ideal, so you shouldn't get shocking fuel economy after a good tune, even without closed loop control.

I don't get heaps better than that myself (used 16L to do 71km's around town the other day, but prob too much boosting). But anyway, I thought mine was too rich, and thought factory O2 was stuffed. Last night I put my LC-1 Wideband O2 sensor on it and went for a drive, 14.5:1 under all idle and cruise conditions! That surprised me, thought it'd be far worse.

Would be very much to your advantage if you could borrow/buy an Innovate Motorsports LM-1/LC-1 and analyse your mixtures, then you'd know before/after, and not have to put all trust in what the workshop tells you. Not too mention you'd then have crucial gear for tuning your ecu yourself if you ever wanted to.

I reluctantly paid $400 (NZ) for mine(and display it on my old laptop), but now I love it and can't imagine not buying it, I'd have no idea what my cars are doing!

Bottomline, it's hard to diagnose fuel troubles, especially with an aftermarket ecu, without some kind of AF reading gear.

Let’s clear up this “closed loop tuning” issue. There is no such thing as “closed loop tuning”, the standard ECU has a simple lambda aim table loaded into its mapping. In a Power FC that is in fact one number, around 15 to 1 A/F ratio.

This means whenever the parameters are met (idle or cruise) the ECU reads of the standard (narrow and slow) lambda sensor and tries to hit the targeted A/F ratio. So it increases or decreases the injector duration continuously trying to keep at 15 to 1. As long as the lambda sensor is working correctly the ECU will always aim for its target A/F ratio, hence there is no tuning required.

Remember with all closed loop running it doesn’t happen instantly, the throttle opening has to be constant, the rpm has to be stable and the (slow and narrow) lambda sensor has to have enough time to read off the A/F ratio and tell the ECU what it is.

This is where a slight improvement in fuel economy can be gained by utilising a fast and wide lambda sensor. By tuning the fuel map locations around the closed loop location (idle and cruise) to give around 15 to 1 A/F ratios. This means that you save that little extra fuel while the ECU is fiddling around reading the lambda sensor etc.

If you have a read of the Tech Edge thread in Forced Induction, I go into some detail on how I tuned the idle and cruise A/F ratios.

:devil: cheers :down:

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

A perfectly working lambda sensor is unlikely to improve the fuel economy from 200 k's per tank. Maybe 20 k's, depending on how much time you spend at cruise or idle. If it's a lot of the time while you are driving, then you might get 15%, but if you spend hardly any time idling and cruising then it won't make much difference at all.

Personally my guess would be you have other problems, not the least of which is tuning.

:devil: cheers :down:

A perfectly working lambda sensor is unlikely to improve the fuel economy from 200 k's per tank. Maybe 20 k's, depending on how much time you spend at cruise or idle. If it's a lot of the time while you are driving, then you might get 15%, but if you spend hardly any time idling and cruising then it won't make much difference at all.

Personally my guess would be you have other problems, not the least of which is tuning.

:wave: cheers :D

I just paid to have it tuned...

Is there anything else it could be?

I spend a lot of time at idle, but not much at cruise... i cant afford to keep running the car like this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...