Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, well it is 2 tank fulls later (800k's) and I can safely say replacing the lambda sensor made no diference what so ever to the fuel economy. It definitely runs nicer, doesn't hesitate when full throttle is applied after long periods of idling (damn Sydney traffic) and cruising. But fuel ecomomy is totally unchanged.

Gotta get that exhaust on and tune it up some more on the dyno. Just need a spare few hours.

:( cheers :)

  • 9 months later...
Nissan recommends changing them every 40,000k's. They don't "wear out" in a mechanical sense. They just get contaminated and don't read the A/F ratios properly.

Interesting to say the least. So how do you know when to replace them? It's not cheap enough just to do it for the sake of it.

How sensitive are they to being knocked around. A friend dropped his once on the bench and it would not work properly after that. I recently dropped mine while doing the dump pipe upgrade - How do I know it is still working?

Would really be interested to know how they work internally?

They use some sort of chemical reaction to create a voltage once they are at the right temperature (which is why they have heater wires as well) THe chemicals get tired after a while and dont work anymore.

The best way to tell if its stuffed is to use a consult cable to monitor the voltage, stuffed ones read 0 or jump around at odd times. Unfortunately working ones jump around a bit too so it is hard to tell if it is dying unless you have a gtr (2 sensors so you can compare voltage)

  • 1 month later...

I took my car out to CRD to get tuned a week ago - they told me my o2 sensor was stuffed and told me a new one would cost $300+ as well as labour charge.

I get <200kms from a tank, if the o2 sensor was stuffed when they tuned it, does that mean it needs tuning again when i put my new o2 sensor in? or does the wide band one they use for tuning mean that it would have been tuned nicely anyway?

If i replace a stuffed o2 sensor should i immediately see an improvement in fuel economy?

Does anyone have an online link to buy an o2 sensor online? to save me a trip to repco...

And is their any adavantage to buying the genuine nissan part as opposed to the falcon part?

i have a falcon one and it works fine, no problems.

Thanks terminal - im thinking i will try to get a genuine part, or at least one that i dont have to change the wires on, would cost me more to get someone to change the falcon one over than it would to spend the extra on the genuine part.

I am taking it that all of this advice is relevant to R33 gts-t owners, not specifically stageas?

Thanks terminal - im thinking i will try to get a genuine part, or at least one that i dont have to change the wires on, would cost me more to get someone to change the falcon one over than it would to spend the extra on the genuine part.

I am taking it that all of this advice is relevant to R33 gts-t owners, not specifically stageas?

The Falcon lambda sensor I used cost $78 from Repco. last time I checked the genuine Nissan one was $180. I don't think anyone is going to charge you $102 to swap over a plug, it's a 10 minute job.

:) Cheers :P

The Falcon lambda sensor I used cost $78 from Repco. last time I checked the genuine Nissan one was $180. I don't think anyone is going to charge you $102 to swap over a plug, it's a 10 minute job.

:) Cheers :)

Change of plan

I bought a falcon sensor from Repco i think it only cost me $58 (hope its the right one)

The auto elec is charging me about $70 to fit it... It was going to be a 2 week wait for the genuine nissan part.

Quick question, can the power FC be tuned with a faulty o2 sensor? i.e. does the wide band sensor they stick in the exhaust mean that it doenst matter about the faulty one up front?

The reason i ask this is because i just paid for my car to be tuned, and when i rang up complaining about fuel issues they told me my o2 sensor was buggered... So did they tune it right and the new sensor will fix my problems? or did i get ripped off?

Change of plan

I bought a falcon sensor from Repco i think it only cost me $58 (hope its the right one)

The auto elec is charging me about $70 to fit it... It was going to be a 2 week wait for the genuine nissan part.

Quick question, can the power FC be tuned with a faulty o2 sensor? i.e. does the wide band sensor they stick in the exhaust mean that it doenst matter about the faulty one up front?

The reason i ask this is because i just paid for my car to be tuned, and when i rang up complaining about fuel issues they told me my o2 sensor was buggered... So did they tune it right and the new sensor will fix my problems? or did i get ripped off?

Depends on what fuel issues you were complaining about, all the tuning under load they'd have used their Wideband O2 for, and your factory narrowband isn't part of the equation. But if your mixtures are wrong under light load and idle, and the Power FC is setup to use closed loop with the factory narrowband, then a stuffed one would be a problem yep.

How do you mean you've got fuel issues?

Depends on what fuel issues you were complaining about, all the tuning under load they'd have used their Wideband O2 for, and your factory narrowband isn't part of the equation. But if your mixtures are wrong under light load and idle, and the Power FC is setup to use closed loop with the factory narrowband, then a stuffed one would be a problem yep.

How do you mean you've got fuel issues?

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

Then they could be talking about lack of closed loop control giving you poor cruise/idle fuel economy(due to stuffed O2). Generally in a full tune, they would input fuel values for all conditions that were close to ideal, so you shouldn't get shocking fuel economy after a good tune, even without closed loop control.

I don't get heaps better than that myself (used 16L to do 71km's around town the other day, but prob too much boosting). But anyway, I thought mine was too rich, and thought factory O2 was stuffed. Last night I put my LC-1 Wideband O2 sensor on it and went for a drive, 14.5:1 under all idle and cruise conditions! That surprised me, thought it'd be far worse.

Would be very much to your advantage if you could borrow/buy an Innovate Motorsports LM-1/LC-1 and analyse your mixtures, then you'd know before/after, and not have to put all trust in what the workshop tells you. Not too mention you'd then have crucial gear for tuning your ecu yourself if you ever wanted to.

I reluctantly paid $400 (NZ) for mine(and display it on my old laptop), but now I love it and can't imagine not buying it, I'd have no idea what my cars are doing!

Bottomline, it's hard to diagnose fuel troubles, especially with an aftermarket ecu, without some kind of AF reading gear.

Let’s clear up this “closed loop tuning” issue. There is no such thing as “closed loop tuning”, the standard ECU has a simple lambda aim table loaded into its mapping. In a Power FC that is in fact one number, around 15 to 1 A/F ratio.

This means whenever the parameters are met (idle or cruise) the ECU reads of the standard (narrow and slow) lambda sensor and tries to hit the targeted A/F ratio. So it increases or decreases the injector duration continuously trying to keep at 15 to 1. As long as the lambda sensor is working correctly the ECU will always aim for its target A/F ratio, hence there is no tuning required.

Remember with all closed loop running it doesn’t happen instantly, the throttle opening has to be constant, the rpm has to be stable and the (slow and narrow) lambda sensor has to have enough time to read off the A/F ratio and tell the ECU what it is.

This is where a slight improvement in fuel economy can be gained by utilising a fast and wide lambda sensor. By tuning the fuel map locations around the closed loop location (idle and cruise) to give around 15 to 1 A/F ratios. This means that you save that little extra fuel while the ECU is fiddling around reading the lambda sensor etc.

If you have a read of the Tech Edge thread in Forced Induction, I go into some detail on how I tuned the idle and cruise A/F ratios.

:devil: cheers :down:

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

A perfectly working lambda sensor is unlikely to improve the fuel economy from 200 k's per tank. Maybe 20 k's, depending on how much time you spend at cruise or idle. If it's a lot of the time while you are driving, then you might get 15%, but if you spend hardly any time idling and cruising then it won't make much difference at all.

Personally my guess would be you have other problems, not the least of which is tuning.

:devil: cheers :down:

A perfectly working lambda sensor is unlikely to improve the fuel economy from 200 k's per tank. Maybe 20 k's, depending on how much time you spend at cruise or idle. If it's a lot of the time while you are driving, then you might get 15%, but if you spend hardly any time idling and cruising then it won't make much difference at all.

Personally my guess would be you have other problems, not the least of which is tuning.

:wave: cheers :D

I just paid to have it tuned...

Is there anything else it could be?

I spend a lot of time at idle, but not much at cruise... i cant afford to keep running the car like this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...