Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bit sunken cant see any issues

Cool, have rims that need heaps of camber to stay inside now & with the popo getting a bit firmer up here I would rather not stir the pot so to speak. Am looking at LMGT4's with track rubber on em, & +30's is what seems the goods to me

what you got on now ill tell you exactly how it will sit/look.

Got 17x8+32 on front-sits good, 17x9 +36 on arse & rim sticks out by 3-4mm-Drifteks cause I think they suit the shape of the body best-my view only(based off picks of LMGT4's anyhow), want a lightweight wheel now-am starting to track it

front will 8.5+30 would sit out 8mm more than your current setup with 4mm less inner clearance

rear is exactly same outer position but you have 12mm more inner clearance 9+36 or 8.5+30

have you rolled your guards or anything? maybe try that and straigten up the camber a bit

front will 8.5+30 would sit out 8mm more than your current setup with 4mm less inner clearance

rear is exactly same outer position but you have 12mm more inner clearance 9+36 or 8.5+30

have you rolled your guards or anything? maybe try that and straigten up the camber a bit

yep guards rolled out, cheers mate-think I have found just what I am after

Wanted a recommendation for R32 GTS 4, want identical front and back in 17 inch, I was thinking of 225/50/17. Is this too high profile? Would 225/45/17 or 215 something 17 be better. Strict street use. Aiming for total legal. Thanks.

no get same sizes all round.

will look pox.

also bad if the rolling diameter of the wheels isnt the same with matching tyres

gtr's really need the same all round, otherwise bye bye attessa

Was looking at getting some Work XD9 for my 33 gts-t- Blags has given me some good info.

Car will do 1 or 2 track days per year, would prefer not to run stretched tyres. Will roll the guards.

Looking at 9 +20 fronts and 10 + 18 rears. Will a 225/40 or 235/40 front and 245/40 rear tyre fit ? I am guessing a 265/35 may not fit on the rear ?

thanks

whats the rim width thats kinda of important. im guessing like 7inch?

Haven't bought rims, so I want opinions on the best width and offset. I want same all round. No upset to ATESSA.

you don't have ATTESA lol
LOL I don't have a GTT, joined forum aspiring to one, couldn't get a loan for one (thank god!), paid cash for an R32 GTS4, does have ATESSA, back to the topic wanted to know ideal 17 inch rim tyre combo for stock guards.
Was looking at getting some Work XD9 for my 33 gts-t- Blags has given me some good info.

Car will do 1 or 2 track days per year, would prefer not to run stretched tyres. Will roll the guards.

Looking at 9 +20 fronts and 10 + 18 rears. Will a 225/40 or 235/40 front and 245/40 rear tyre fit ? I am guessing a 265/35 may not fit on the rear ?

thanks

if your doing track days i guess you dont want camber, i did fit 265/35 on 10"+20 with lots of camber.

the tyres sizes you are suggesting are "Stretched" as they are not the recommended tyre sizes for the rims your suggesting. but without stretching tyres you'll struggle to make them fit gts-t guards.

Skyline model = r34 gtt

Wheel diameter = 19inches

Wheel width = 8 front 9 rear

Wheel offset = +23 front +9 rear

Tyre size =215 front and 225 rear

Modifications to fit = everything lol, flare, roll, pump, remove inner plastics.

next set of rims will be even more ridiculous probs go bolt on flares

GOT SOME NEW RIMS NOW

18x9.5 +15 te37s

rears will fit sweet (i think perfectly flush)

fronts will stick out about an inch i think so gonna dial in some camber and some stretch and see where we go from there hahaha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...