Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R377- Yeah they do, good spot! only the AME isn't quite as aggressive looking to me as theres more dish and less spokes,

on that silver r33 they look decent, and they are half the price I might add.

so you guys really think the 18*9.5 15offset wont fit well? I used to have rota Grid 18*9.5 30 offset all round and I could fit my index finger under the rear arch, the front had even more room,

post-70965-0-29682100-1390221575_thumb.jpgpost-70965-0-85245300-1390221652_thumb.jpg

235/35 on front with camber on front

Edited by AngryRB

personally, I got as much slack as possible from inside the bay and lengthened it by a couple of CM then zip tied it right up in the top of the guard above the rail

  • Like 1

@ Angry Rb.

I personally like these

http://enkei.com/rs05rr.shtml

heaps of sizes available

18x9.5 +22

18x10 +22 +30 ( I am quite sure the 30 would fit the rear, not sure about the +22 ?)

10.5 +25 +35 ( I am quite sure the 35 would fit the rear, not sure about the +25 ?)

Yeah they look pretty decent, only thing is the price tag :(

I am not sure what they are worth but here is a guide:

http://www.streettot...enkeiwheels.htm

streettotrack is a SAU sponsor. Autotechnik is on the silvia forums. Jesse Streeter

The tenjin look ok with the machined lip come in 9.5 +15

http://enkei.com/tenjin.shtml#

You said you had a silver 33, can check out these NT03's

http://www.fdrx7.com...read.php?t=7899

http://www.skylinesa...r-swap-or-sale/

Liking these rims, would 18*9.5 15offset be good with these or too much? want the back to be aggressive with a 235

post-70965-0-25386100-1390569832_thumb.jpg

with this wheel I think id be less likely to be pulled over, kind of looks quality over rota steroid look

Edited by AngryRB
Hi all,

Will these fit 1990 R32 GTR ?

Advan RZ-DF 19x10.5 +15

Badly want 19 inch but happy to

go down in width to 9.5.

Guards already rolled.

Any advise greatly appreciated.

Thanks

http://www.yokohamahk.com/products_detail.php?id=74

Tyre size 265/30/19

They also make these in 19x10.5 +25

Better option for R32 GTR ?

Options ? Advise ?

well obviously. but cops werent posted on every corner of the road years ago.....I had my old VW eating the weeds and throwing sparks off the exhaust on hard 2nd gear shifts back in the day. and never got hastled.

I'd like to think roads were better then too...but I'm sure it just bothered me less :)

Skyline model = R32 GTR
Wheel diameter = 18"
Wheel width = 9"
Wheel offset = +20 (+5 if reverse mounting the face on BBS LMs)
Tyre size = 265/35/18
Modifications to fit = None

Following pic is with +20 offset, next thing to do is reverse mount the face so that the wheel sits flush with the guards :yes:

20140108_171941_zpsd731d1bd.jpg

well obviously. but cops werent posted on every corner of the road years ago.....I had my old VW eating the weeds and throwing sparks off the exhaust on hard 2nd gear shifts back in the day. and never got hastled.

I'd like to think roads were better then too...but I'm sure it just bothered me less :)

we all had our 33's only 2 years ago tops...

In vic it has been that bad for aaaages

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...