Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R377- Yeah they do, good spot! only the AME isn't quite as aggressive looking to me as theres more dish and less spokes,

on that silver r33 they look decent, and they are half the price I might add.

so you guys really think the 18*9.5 15offset wont fit well? I used to have rota Grid 18*9.5 30 offset all round and I could fit my index finger under the rear arch, the front had even more room,

post-70965-0-29682100-1390221575_thumb.jpgpost-70965-0-85245300-1390221652_thumb.jpg

235/35 on front with camber on front

Edited by AngryRB

personally, I got as much slack as possible from inside the bay and lengthened it by a couple of CM then zip tied it right up in the top of the guard above the rail

  • Like 1

@ Angry Rb.

I personally like these

http://enkei.com/rs05rr.shtml

heaps of sizes available

18x9.5 +22

18x10 +22 +30 ( I am quite sure the 30 would fit the rear, not sure about the +22 ?)

10.5 +25 +35 ( I am quite sure the 35 would fit the rear, not sure about the +25 ?)

Yeah they look pretty decent, only thing is the price tag :(

I am not sure what they are worth but here is a guide:

http://www.streettot...enkeiwheels.htm

streettotrack is a SAU sponsor. Autotechnik is on the silvia forums. Jesse Streeter

The tenjin look ok with the machined lip come in 9.5 +15

http://enkei.com/tenjin.shtml#

You said you had a silver 33, can check out these NT03's

http://www.fdrx7.com...read.php?t=7899

http://www.skylinesa...r-swap-or-sale/

Liking these rims, would 18*9.5 15offset be good with these or too much? want the back to be aggressive with a 235

post-70965-0-25386100-1390569832_thumb.jpg

with this wheel I think id be less likely to be pulled over, kind of looks quality over rota steroid look

Edited by AngryRB
Hi all,

Will these fit 1990 R32 GTR ?

Advan RZ-DF 19x10.5 +15

Badly want 19 inch but happy to

go down in width to 9.5.

Guards already rolled.

Any advise greatly appreciated.

Thanks

http://www.yokohamahk.com/products_detail.php?id=74

Tyre size 265/30/19

They also make these in 19x10.5 +25

Better option for R32 GTR ?

Options ? Advise ?

well obviously. but cops werent posted on every corner of the road years ago.....I had my old VW eating the weeds and throwing sparks off the exhaust on hard 2nd gear shifts back in the day. and never got hastled.

I'd like to think roads were better then too...but I'm sure it just bothered me less :)

Skyline model = R32 GTR
Wheel diameter = 18"
Wheel width = 9"
Wheel offset = +20 (+5 if reverse mounting the face on BBS LMs)
Tyre size = 265/35/18
Modifications to fit = None

Following pic is with +20 offset, next thing to do is reverse mount the face so that the wheel sits flush with the guards :yes:

20140108_171941_zpsd731d1bd.jpg

well obviously. but cops werent posted on every corner of the road years ago.....I had my old VW eating the weeds and throwing sparks off the exhaust on hard 2nd gear shifts back in the day. and never got hastled.

I'd like to think roads were better then too...but I'm sure it just bothered me less :)

we all had our 33's only 2 years ago tops...

In vic it has been that bad for aaaages

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...