Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i am about to up grade my car again and i got my turbo gt35r got 500hp fule pump got front mount got a hd clutch and im going to put in some 555cc injectors this means i will be able to boost it up but iam worried if i going to get it over 400hp which im pretty sure i will i am going have to up grade a lot more at the moment i have 370hp does any one know what other things i will have to do to my car

post-8385-1125914714.jpg

post-8385-1125914807.jpg

Edited by wallystyles
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86585-400hp-what-upgrades/
Share on other sites

clutch

airflow meter

555cs probably wont be enough, 740c's are only like $20 extra each

youll want a nice big exhaust for a gt35. 4" or 3.5" from turbo back

youll want some suspension work and brake work done otherwise it will be a coffin. aftermarket ecu a must. unsure how std fail rail will go.

the only you dont have is lag, but that will come when you put that sucker on :D

you'll need a properly built motor if you expect it to last any moderate length of time.

The GT35 is overkill for what you want to begin with.

Its a turbo that will pump 350rwkw on pulp given the right spec.

When you say you have 370hp now, is that RWHP?

Although i doubt it as you make no mention of having injectors in there as yet

Bigger isnt always better, and for 400hp (which i assume isnt 400rwhp as i said above with the 370hp)

A car will a smaller turbo will eat you for breakkie ;)

i do have 370 rwhp i also have a apexi power fc and my turbo is allready on but i still have stock injectors will 740cc injectors be able to push my turbo harder i want somthing that will last as well as go hard but i dont want to kill myself the car is fast now i was going to put the injectores on next week and a custom radator on it how much will a clutch cost and what sort will be good for my set up

Edited by wallystyles

well isn't 400rwhp still under 300 RWKW??

550cc injectors will do that fine without having an adjustable FPR. 740cc would just make idle quality really bad.

edit -- is that your widebody gtst??? looks good i lke the gurads etc.

Edited by Craved

My injectors hit max with 325rwhp through a Malpassi fuel pressure reg.

There is a general consensus that 250rwkw it about the max power you can get from the stock injectors.

I'd question your injectors (maybe they are aftermarket and you don't know it, maybe they have been high flowed) or I'd question the accuracy of the dyno.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...