Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i got my car dynoed,

r33 gtst with

fmic,

3 inch exhaust all the way with standard dump pipe,

boost at just under 10psi

it was running well, richened up a bit at the end, which i was told was fine.

But why the huge loss of power thru the drive train??? if it has 200kW i was expecting a more impressive figure of say 160rwkw at least!

ive raised the boost up after that to about 11-12 psi but it still doesnt feel like a jet..

138.8rwkw sounds a bit embarrasing. Do people talk rear wheel kw on here or mainly at the flywheel?

further down the track will be dump pipe, and power fc and tune.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89359-only-1388rwkw-gtst/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

what about your cat? is it a highflow item or compliance item?

the cat and the standard dump pipe will be severly restricting the flow at that amount of boost.

Get a new dump pipe, and cat (if you dont have one already) and the car should push a shitload better when on boost.

also get a new highflow panel filter if you havent already, these basic steps will see you pushing some better figures.

And we all usually talk rear wheel kilowatts rwkw, its pretty hard to pull the engine and dyno it at the engine :O

i'l have to check my cat out. but ive got a newish looking 3inch system from the dump pipe and back.

I bought the car with a pod, so i dont have the standard airbox.

well i asked the guys that dynoed it how they got the flywheel figure, and they said it can be done by computer.. :O

so i guess its probably the dump pipe restricting me.

tho i could swear it nearly felt faster before i got the cooler and raised the boost :S

maybe just phsycological since there isnt that second stage boost kick any more

post your dyno chart it will help diagnose the problem... even if the dyno is reading low you should be making better power than that...

I make 200rwkw with stock cat and dump pipe so I'm not sure thats the best place to start... look to see if you have a problem before throwing parts at it IMO...

then a power fc or piggyback to lean out your mixtures and just make sure your pod isn't sucking hot air... then you should be right

Yes the good old first dyno... it was a shocker for me as well; but since then: lots of sweat, blood and $$$ to get a less embarassing number :)

I must say I was near tears when I saw my first dyno graph :O

hi mate, when u made 200rwkw was that also on "just under 10psi"? and was it in shoot out mode?

138 does seem low but when u said just under 10psi is that 9 or 8? cuz theres a fair bit of difference.

And id have to agree with the piggy back computer suggestion especailly when increasing boost!, already a turbo skyline runs rich, especally in the top end. this is an extreme measure the stock cpu takes to prevent pinging, but if u get better air to fuel ratios ur engine will have better combuistion and ull increase ur output by about 30rwkw

best of luck dude

post your dyno chart it will help diagnose the problem... even if the dyno is reading low you should be making better power than that...

I make 200rwkw with stock cat and dump pipe so I'm not sure thats the best place to start... look to see if you have a problem before throwing parts at it IMO...

then a power fc or piggyback to lean out your mixtures and just make sure your pod isn't sucking hot air... then you should be right

thanks for the replies.

It was practically 10psi, it did reach it at one stage but then bled off a touch which is meant to be ok.

I plan to make a box for my pod so it draws air thru a hole where the old intercooler piping came thru. Im sceptical on the result of this tho, as by the time the air goes through the turbo it gets so hot it needs to go via the intercooler anyway.

as i mentioned earlier i thought drivetrain power loss would only be 40kW max.. hehe not 60 :) depressing especialy when u see people posting these 190 - 220rwkw figures haha..

Is the general consensus that a piggy back computer with a tune will provide me with a Significant power increase for now, or do i need the dump pipe to make the most of it.

(spending $$$ on a dump pipe and powerfc at this stage is waay down the track at this stage unfortunately)

ok next thing i just thought of, compression test to see if there is any blow by past the rings, how many K's of the clock, the fuel Econ seems not to bad

I just had a look at the graph for some reason its been done in 3rd gear not 4th

well if you're running in shootout 6 it should read higher, most r33 with fmic & 10psi boost can easily make 180rwkw on the dyno chart.

something is definitely not right... are you sure:

1 your clutch is not slipping?

2 your tyres not slipping on the dyno roller?

3 your fuel pump is not dying? it happened to me and it confuses the ecu showing a/f is good but it's actually constantly retarding timing and i only reached no more than 150rwkw till i replaced the fuel pump.

4 in my experience with stock ecu, anything above 10psi boost will be a little bit hard for the stock ecu to manage, it'll get very confused, unless you have a freak one that handles 12psi ok. wait till u get powerfc before winding it up.

5. check other things that may contribute to the issue like your coil packs, fuel filter, plugs, and don't forget to check your base timing! had a mate who had weird pinging problem cos his base timing is way off.

I don't think its that bad a power figure. If you think about it stock would be about 130rwkw. You haven't finished the whole exhaust, intercooler doesn't really give more power by itself, 10psi + cooler probably too much airflow for stock ecu.

Mine at 10psi with with R34 cooler was goiong rich and retard. All depends on the setup but seems some seem to be able to handle more mods etc before stock ecu has a fit. I'm suprised people make 180rwkw without either piggyback or full ecu..my experience with the strock computer is that it is pretty cr*p

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's a boring history lesson on number plates People want illegal spacing to make their plate more readable, if mine was J2X BK, anyone who knows about the car would see that its spelling JZX. Years ago third party plate manufacturers could alter the text to make it look like something else, nowadays the computer software is locks that ability (well, ours does at work) Up until 2001 the first letter of a number plate represented the year of the vehicle, for example A would be 1983. (pre 1983, the format was backwards, so the year letter was on the end). Followed by 3 random numbers and 3 random letters. Things started to get complicated at the end of the 90s where T and V were 1999, W and X were 2000 and Y was early 2001. From 2001 they introduced a new 'layout' where the first two characters are letters, this represented where that vehicle was first registered in the country. The letters corrosponded to a region in the country. Some regions had a large number of codes, where as some only had a couple (despite being large in physical land size) Next are 2 numbers to indicate 2000s. So it went from: Y (March 1999 > Aug 2000) 51 (Sept 2001 > Feb 2002) 02 (March 2002 > Aug 2002) 52 (Sept 2002 > Feb 2003) etc etc When the 2010s got here, the numbers changed again, going up by tens 10 (March 2010 > Aug 2010) 60 (Sept 2010 > Feb 2011) When the 2020s arrived it went to 20 (March 2020 > Aug 2020) 70 (Sept 2020 > Feb 2021) etc As for personalised plates, you're not allowed a registration that makes the vehicle look newer. Take my 110 for example, its a 2004 car so I can have any available plate upto 04. I can't have a 54 because it was manufactured in August 2004. Which allows me to have a J plate, because its older (if that makes sense)    
    • Mount some of these on your dash? https://www.greddy.com/products/16001720  
    • Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it. What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it? Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.  
    • It turns out that Setrab make a fan specifically for the oil cooler which is great and I've installed it with minimal swearing. I removed my 2x 12in push fans from the front of my aircon condenser and wired them into this. My main thermo fans kick on when I use the aircon anyway and would effectively already be working as puller fans through the condensor which is infront of the rad. The push fans (understandably) didn't really do much in the config they were previously in so now they're out. Now we're on to the "Oil fan doesn't really do much either!". Yes I'll duct it next if it does nothing in heavy use which it shouldn't. But hey, the object exists and fits great and is cool. Let me have this. The car is still in the "do my fittings leak oil now? do my wheels actually rub?" phase. I did a spirited drive on them and didn't hear or feel anything. Then I got back home and noticed there were grind marks on the inside of the rims, though I couldn't see where they were touching I got out the grinder and attacked the suspects. Note: I do not know how to use a grinder. Then I realised I had dragged my new rims across my concrete driveway before I did this drive. I didn't think I had damage at that time when I briefly looked...... but remembered this occurred after I did all the angle grinding. The grinding on the wheels in some very specific spots. It's not around the whole rim for example, which lines up with dragging it across concrete more than hitting a suspension component for even 1 full rotation. So everything is currently painted and taped up and I need to test it some more to see if it really IS rubbing, but from inside the car it doesn't feel like it is. In other news I attempted to do a before and after comparison of the heads/cam upgrade thing. Dynos lie, everything is in different measurements. Here is the data from the sandown back straight. Car go faster than before. Vroom vroom.
    • Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno.  Let me know your thoughts. 
×
×
  • Create New...