Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 333
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

stock turb a 33-t does 200 tops.

stock turb a GTR can get to near 300  So its believable easily.

NEO runs more compression than non-NEO RB25. Thats why 14psi is limits :D

Thats what i think :)

The stock R33 turbo IS a 0.63 A/R

The stock GTR turbo is a 0.42 A/R

A gtr turbo on it's own cannot get 300, there is a pair of them don't forget.

As with the compression, 14psi boost is not it's limit. You are right about fuel being his problem but these engines will take more than 14 psi. I have sent them over 18psi on stock internals with no ping whatsoever. It just needs to be tuned properly.

The better option would have probably been to go for a true GT30R on a highmount with external gate. You will achieve massive results provided you can keep the fuel up to it. A water methanol injection system will help you out with your pinging problem as you are effectively increasing the octane rating of the fuel.

Then look at an electronic boost controller to fix the weird boost problems, he said he'd just stick a 15psi actuator on there to make it easier again..

Im using a dual stage Hybrid brand EBC, and can recommend it. Cost f-all really. No spikes, doesnt go past what I tell it to go up to, etc. Good value for money, Mafia.

With a big upgrade like you've got I would have thought it'd be wise to have a solenoid-controlled boost (although I am a newb @ turb's so my opinion counts for jack s_t).

Hhhm, crating drums of petrol isnt a bad short-term solution, just initially very expensive. Maybe worth looking into to help out in the meantime, whilst you're waiting for new higher Ron petrol bowsers in your area!! :D

Keep at it mate, well done, and I hope I never run into headf* problems when I have the $ to do my gt30-hiflow upgrade (18months away). <_<

Brendan

I'd consider shipping drums up but I can't due to the fact I have no where to store it. If I did, I would certainly do it.

I'm not a guy with heaps of cash either so yeah, I'll be looking for the most cost effective solution.

One of my mates runs a Supra with 375rwkw, and he said that he got the last 100hp with the water methanol kit. Stopped all pinging.

I guess thats all we can do for now until we get some fuel which I highly doubt.

As with the compression, 14psi boost is not it's limit. You are right about fuel being his problem but these engines will take more than 14 psi. I have sent them over 18psi on stock internals with no ping whatsoever. It just needs to be tuned properly.

The 14psi thing, if you read what i quoted, was Bass Junky's limit for his NEO using the GCG hi-flow before pinging was an issue due to the higher compression of the NEO vs the non-NEO RB25 (did i just repeat myself?)

Its not a question of how much out-right PSI you cna screw into the thing.

Its the airflow

The better option would have probably been to go for a true GT30R on a highmount with external gate. You will achieve massive results provided you can keep the fuel up to it. A water methanol injection system will help you out with your pinging problem as you are effectively increasing the octane rating of the fuel.

So are you saying that because his turbo isnt "true", meaning high-mounted and he isnt using an external gate that he isnt getting the best results?

Considering that 95 fuel is being used and such low boost the results themselves are pretty damn good.

Fuel/meth and boost with a .63 and it'll be up into the 250 no worries

And thats pretty much as far as its gonna get, maybe 270 as a peak

A GT30 with the older wheel really isnt doing a great deal other than hanging on for the ride with 14psi on his motor

A GT30 with the older wheel really isnt doing a great deal other than hanging on for the ride with 14psi on his motor

Thanks so much for the info, but what do you mean by this?

Do I have the older wheel?

ye, discopotato noted it also.

Its the T04S wheel, not the GT trim one.

T04 is the 7-blade and the GT is a 6-blade comp wheel.

Read disco's posts so far in this thread, he's right on the money with what he says :D

So are you saying that because his turbo isnt "true", meaning high-mounted and he isnt using an external gate that he isnt getting the best results?

I'm not saying he won't get what he has set out to achieve with the setup he has. I am saying he will achieve more with the other setup and won't have exhaust restriction to worry about.

I don't believe the exhaust manifold poses a problem up until ~300rwkw where it literally hits a brick wall and will not allow any more power to be made.

There's 2 RB's running around Adelaide with the stock log, both appear to hit a brick wall ~300rwkw.

One of the turbo's is a GT3540 .82 internal gate running ~18-19psi making slightly over 300rwkw on a rb30det, the other is a GT3040 running an internal gate making ~300rwkw on a rb25det. Both are running cams, running on the same dyno that is known not to be conservative.

BUT, there is gains to be had by using a nice manifold. More ignition timing due to less uneven cylinder reversion. One person I know of picked up 20rwkw (306 - 326rwkw) by changing the exhaust manifold @ the same boost.

Edited by Cubes

I agree it is the fuel.

When mine was dead stock it used to ping slightly on 95RON BP.

The BP's started getting 98 Ultimate and I was able to dial in 17degree's and up the boost to 12.5psi without ping.

I also agree it's fuel but what's stopping him from just injecting more of it? Back up the timing a degree or two and up the boost. 98 and 100 ron fuels haven't been around forever and people didn't seem to have any problems back then

The fuel does play a big part but I do think its its simply a combination of things. It needs some good dyno time to sort them out.

Fuel, Cam timing, afr's, ign. timing and boost.

Mafia... Do a map trace and take note of what load points are used, then let us know what ignition timing is being run through out the rev range at WOT.

Edited by Cubes

hang on, one sec your saying he needs to high-mount and ext gate the turbo.

but now its the fuel thats causeing the problem?

Its simple, whats stopping him? fuel!

No point backing out too much timing to screw boost into it.

The fuel needs to be sorted before those sorts of things get fiddled with

98/100 hasnt been around that long... maybe, but niether has higher compression ratios

hang on, one sec your saying he needs to high-mount and ext gate the turbo.

but now its the fuel thats causeing the problem?

I never said that. Go back and read my post. I was saying that he would, in general, achieve higher results with that type of setup. I wasn't saying that was the cause of his lack of power at the moment.

hang on, one sec your saying he needs to high-mount and ext gate the turbo.

but now its the fuel thats causeing the problem?

Its simple, whats stopping him? fuel!

No point backing out too much timing to screw boost into it.

The fuel needs to be sorted before those sorts of things get fiddled with

98/100 hasnt been around that long... maybe, but niether has higher compression ratios

here is the Ignition map...pretty pathetic hey... It gives me a maximum of 20 knock on a hot 35 - 40 degree day. NOt sure on the WOT positions, but you can kind of see it on the fine tuning on the p13 and p14 rows. I don't think it gets any lower than that.

timing.htm

The cruise areas look like they have been tweaked.

This could possibly be the reason for poor fuel economy.

I'll have a look exactly how much they have been tweaked. :P

Too much ignition timing can cause poor fuel economy also.

Edited by Cubes

thanks, and let me know if I could sneak anymore in the lower range safely.

I could add 10 more degrees and see no knock but I dunno if thats dangerous or not. I dunno if too much advance is good or not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...