Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gnome infestation is not usually so common in the early RB series, i have heard of one or two cases of it in late model (34) RBs though.

i think if you get the brotec beak upgrade kit for the woodpecker that should sort out the problem.

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have a leakdown tester  but you will need a compressor to do the test , i can do for you if you like and i maybe able to give you a more educated guess as to whats wrong with it .

If its a bearing you will do more damage to the crank by running it but if you pulle it out you should change the crank with a new one anyway , if you spin the bearing then conrod through the block is possible .

If the crank was machined they would have used undersize bearings .

Injector can be noisy warm or cold .

A lifter can be come noisy when the clearances grow , there nothing wrong with the lifter , just bigger clearance . you can check with a filler gauge but you need to take the rocker covers off .

The lower comp on the 2 cil maybe because they had the valve clearances to tight ( to have a quiet engine ) and the valves are starting to burn a little .

Did you check comp before ?

You are correct in saying a leakdown test wont tell you if it leaks for valves or rings but it will still tell you more than a comp test .

To much oil in the cil thats the reason comp went up so much ( you made the combustion chamber smaller ( like having higher comp ratio ) .

A leakdown test WILL tell you whether it is rings or valves. You will hear the air passing out the exhaust or inlet if its a valve or out the rocker cover breather if it's a ring.

Being a GTR engine it will have shimmable buckets so you will need FEELER GUAGES to check valve clearances. If you don't know how to do it then take it to a professional.

Have you done any engine building before?

The bearings won't need to be oversize if the crank was just polished. There would be no need to machine the crank unless there was damage to it from the previous bearings.

What clearances did you measure on the big end's and mains?

What piston to bore clearance did you have?

Did you use new rings?

Did you offset the ring gaps?

Did you get the alloy dowels taken out of the crank and replaced with threaded studs? (you should have)

What oil pressure does it have? (idle, cruise and full noise)

I would not remove the engine until you have seen the condition of the shims and cams. Check these first before doing anything else.

...Have you done any engine building before?

...What clearances did you measure on the big end's and mains?

...What piston to bore clearance did you have?

... Did you use new rings?

...Did you offset the ring gaps?

...Did you get the alloy dowels taken out of the crank and replaced with threaded studs? (you should have)

...What oil pressure does it have? (idle, cruise and full noise)

Gday mate....answers in order (I hope)

Nope, I just read the instructions. I did have some help and had professionals do the head reco and the bottom end machining.

Unfortunately I'm not sure, the bottom end shop did it and said they were OK for standard bearing size but did not give me the exact measurements....never again.

As above

Yep brand new standard nissan rings. measured ring end gaps before installation and they were within spec (once again I didnt note the measurements)

Yep offset per the manual no ring gap pointing to the front, rear or side of the bore

Nope, bottom end has to be stock for class regulations.

Oil Pressure is perfect about 6ish dead cold, rises to 8 if given a little rev cold. Was correctly at about 2 at the end of the race. It looks fine which I think is kinda wierd if it is a bearing problem?

:)

And...where do I get a leakdown gauge and what is the approx price for a decent one?

  • 10 months later...

Well I know everyone has been holding their breath with anticipation about an update, so the good news is we tore down this motor today.

First up we can rule out woodpeckers or gnones, unless they were made of metal and hit the turbine wheel.

First hint that all was not great was when we pulled the intake pipes off there were metal shavings in the intake, both sides of the cooler. I assume this is not "a good thing"

Pulled the turbos off, rear one looks like this:

smalldeadturbo.jpg

Anyway, from there there are not too many mysteries....like everyone said a spun big end bearing, no surprise among the sea of metal filings in the sump.

Block is light scored, should buff right out.

Crank slightly damaged, may need machining undersize, will see what the machine shop says on Monday

whoa, longest tear down ever!

I wouldn't rule out the gnomes yet. They must have been hindering this tear down to make it take a whole year, and they must have also used their special powers to erase your memory of them.

never found what actually did the damage, I guess it could still be in the intercooler it wasn't in the intake, plenum or motor (well bits of it were...but not the whole thing). Either way seems it is a bad idea to have large metal objects hit a turbo blade

So....what is wrong with my RB26?

Recently rebuilt by a engine builder with very suspect abilities. Completed 2000klm since rebuild including 4 oil changes. Running standard computer and standard boost. Rev limit is 8500.

Last 1000klm since running in finished have been a practice day at Wakefiled Park, a race meet at Oran Park and a race meet at Wakefield. In the last race at wakefeild I heard a knock on the last lap, finished the cool down lap and parked it.

The problem - there is a knock/tap in the motor. rises with revs

Oil pressure is normal (great)

Compression test results:

# - Dry test - wet test

1 - 10.5 kg/cm2 - 12.5 kg/cm2

2 - 12 kg/cm2 - 14 kg/cm2

3 - 12 kg/cm2 - 14 kg/cm2

4 - 12 kg/cm2 - 14 kg/cm2

5 - 12 kg/cm2 - 14 kg/cm2

6 - 11.5 kg/cm2 - 13.5 kg/cm2

Battery was boosted by a running car, engine was dead cold. No leakdown test

The noise sounds like it is coming from the top of the motor, maybe at the front or maybe I am imagining it. I put a screwdriver on the head next to my ear, and looked like a person with a screwdriver in my ear.

Anyway....lets have some educated guesses about what is wrong...answers to come sometime in the next few weeks when I get around to pulling it out.

try this, a mate of mine recently had a crank angle sensor fail and the engine made knocking sounds like you describe, and my r32 gtr has just developed the same sounds, you could expect if the sensor fails the timming is out badly and as a result engine knock so try checking this, also check coils, igniter . i`m hopeing for both our sakes its as simple as this, and back on the road again. it may not be the fault of the engine builder at all, and as past experince has tought me dont be to quick to assign blame. so good luck with your car

haha thanks but there have been some updates since my original post :P

Both turbos needed new bearings due to metal in the oil farking them, and obviously the new blade.

Big thumbs up to John at Precision Tubros in Wetheril Park, he has put them back in 1 piece quick and cheap :D

Still waiting on confirmation of the bottom end damage / whether it will buff right out or not

How interesting mate.......surely you heard this happen or was Kel driving [ducks and runs].

This has almost taken as long as my track car :laugh: but I've just had approval to pull it in and start dismantling.

So how much was the turbo rebuild and did it include steel exhaust wheels?

BTW no Kel was not driving, and 12 months later I am still very busted for blowing it up before she got to drive it properly.....should be back together soon.

The more I think about it the more I recokon a nut or something was in there right from original assembly...it never made any bad noises until the bearing spun.

But I never put it on the dyno or checked compression, didn't get around to it....might explain why I was OK in the tight stuff but the baddies got away on the straights

Steel Wheels on the back end or the stock ceramics? No damage at the back end whe the foreign object went through? PM me the shop details please mate? I wanna keep the TT concept running even if I am going to sell the car and get something else for track.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...