Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For all those that have been thinking about getting braided brake lines to reduce the expansion rubber hoses can have under big brake pressure, there is an interesting article on Autospeed this week http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2679/article.html

"Well, the first hose we tested was an old and worn rubber hose (which appears to be the original part from a ’65 Ford Mustang). In static conditions, this hose had an OD of 10.76mm and, when pressurised, it expanded to 11.02mm. An increase of 2.4 percent.

Next, we tested a brand new rubber hose. The new hose had a 10.47mm OD which expanded to 10.65mm when pressurised. An increase of 1.7 percent.

The final test was a new braided steel brake line. In static conditions, the braided line had an OD of 6.45mm and expanded to 6.49mm when pressurised. An increase of less than 1 percent."

0.7% difference in exansion between rubber and braided lines at 3500psi (about twice what you could actually generate). Considering the price is about 3 - 4 times as much......just buy new rubber hoses.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90013-braided-or-rubber-brake-hoses/
Share on other sites

Can I ask what might be a stupid question. Percentages are nice and all, but in real life what does that percentage mean, like, is that 0.5% in expansion a bit increase or not?

Also remember whatever it is its x4.

3 - 4 times as much??? pffft. The braided hose we got from Maltech were marginally more expensive than Nissan hoses. They cost around $350 for a set of 4. I purchased a pair of genuine Nissan front hoses at $90 EACH.

3 - 4 times as expensive. PFFFTT!

yeah the genuine rubber ones are more expensive these days. i bought a set of nismo braided lines for 10 000 yen (about $130). they were very nice too.

the expansion measurement as a percentage is interesting too. the fact is the old rubber expanded .26mm where as the braided line only expanded .04. that is quite a difference among 4 lines (well six really on the GTR).

well I lost the receipt for my rubber lines in the mountain of receipts I have. But any decent brake shop can make up brake lines for you much cheaper, you don't need to use the Nissan ones.

And I can assure you that my pedal feel is brilliant with the new rubber hoses :P

the nismo ones, were they $130 a corner?

nah, $130 for all 6. they are really nice too. Teflon lines, covered with stainless braid, then sheathed in teflon (or it may be silicone) to protect them. Without something covering the braid you can get problems as over time bits of dirt and grit can work their way into the gaps in the braid then slowing wear away at the line inside.

edit: I should mention that i bought them in japan on the cheap. I think the retail in japan is about 15 000 yen, and over here they are probably about $300 a set. still a good deal i reckon even at that price. particulary if bens maltech ones were $500 :P

I had braided lines on my 32 when it arrived, though for compliance reasons had to take them off. MASSIVE difference in feel of pedal. Was quite shocked, i thought the brand new lines i got made up would be very similar. Will hopefully go back to braided lines at some stage. It cost excactly twice as much for braided lines as rubber ones when i got quote. PS Have set of HKS sports braided lines for sale.

Guys please correct me if I have it wrong, but the way I see it, if hose A expands by 1.7% and hose B expands by 1%, then the conclusion is that hose A expands 70% more than B, not a .7% difference...?

So 1/1.7 = braided has only 60% of the expansion that rubber does?

Also keep in mind that the tests where probably done at room temperature not at the temperatures often seen by brake hoses (you should all know rubber gets softer with heat). Also with braided hoses being silver wouldn't they be less susceptible to transfering heat to the brake fluid.

Carlos

I think it's just a case of the journalist having some space to fill in and not actually understanding what's going on.

I have been involved and done similar tests and i know how to manipulate percentages, just measuring the expansion of the hose is not good enough. If you are going to do this type of test you must ensure each hose is the same length and new (not like the rubber hose shown). Also the machine used to do the test as shown in the article is not adequate for this type of testing, it keeps pumping pressure until its reaches it set pressure, the way it should be done is see what force is required to reach a certain pressure this will tell you how much the pressure the hose is absorbing. I’m certain a braided hose will out perform a rubber hose anytime.

omrae it sounds like you know what you are talking about....

Now I agree in total braided lines will be better than rubber....the question is, how much better.

If a new rubber line really does increase only 0.7% more than a braided one does, I am willing to bet that no-one could actually tell the difference on the track :)

If a new rubber line really does increase only 0.7% more than a braided one does, I am willing to bet that no-one could actually tell the difference on the track :)

I'll make up some number just for the sake of simplicity.

Assume the OD of the hose is 10mm.

If hose A expands to 11mm and hose B expands to 15mm:

Hose A has increased by 10%

Hose B has increased by 50%

Hose B has not increased 40% more than A, it has increased 5 times that of A.

What I'm getting at is, the rubber hose increased by 1.7%, braided >1.0%, therefore the rubber hose has increased by nearly twice what the braided line did.

cowie165 I agree mathematically 1.7% is almost twice the expansion of 1% but thats not really the point....the difference in total diameter is 1% or 1.7% which lets face it is bugger all as a percentage of total diameter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cheers. Skyline is back on the menu, can’t get rid of it. It’s like a child you don’t want, or herpes 
    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
×
×
  • Create New...