Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For all those that have been thinking about getting braided brake lines to reduce the expansion rubber hoses can have under big brake pressure, there is an interesting article on Autospeed this week http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2679/article.html

"Well, the first hose we tested was an old and worn rubber hose (which appears to be the original part from a ’65 Ford Mustang). In static conditions, this hose had an OD of 10.76mm and, when pressurised, it expanded to 11.02mm. An increase of 2.4 percent.

Next, we tested a brand new rubber hose. The new hose had a 10.47mm OD which expanded to 10.65mm when pressurised. An increase of 1.7 percent.

The final test was a new braided steel brake line. In static conditions, the braided line had an OD of 6.45mm and expanded to 6.49mm when pressurised. An increase of less than 1 percent."

0.7% difference in exansion between rubber and braided lines at 3500psi (about twice what you could actually generate). Considering the price is about 3 - 4 times as much......just buy new rubber hoses.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90013-braided-or-rubber-brake-hoses/
Share on other sites

Can I ask what might be a stupid question. Percentages are nice and all, but in real life what does that percentage mean, like, is that 0.5% in expansion a bit increase or not?

Also remember whatever it is its x4.

3 - 4 times as much??? pffft. The braided hose we got from Maltech were marginally more expensive than Nissan hoses. They cost around $350 for a set of 4. I purchased a pair of genuine Nissan front hoses at $90 EACH.

3 - 4 times as expensive. PFFFTT!

yeah the genuine rubber ones are more expensive these days. i bought a set of nismo braided lines for 10 000 yen (about $130). they were very nice too.

the expansion measurement as a percentage is interesting too. the fact is the old rubber expanded .26mm where as the braided line only expanded .04. that is quite a difference among 4 lines (well six really on the GTR).

well I lost the receipt for my rubber lines in the mountain of receipts I have. But any decent brake shop can make up brake lines for you much cheaper, you don't need to use the Nissan ones.

And I can assure you that my pedal feel is brilliant with the new rubber hoses :P

the nismo ones, were they $130 a corner?

nah, $130 for all 6. they are really nice too. Teflon lines, covered with stainless braid, then sheathed in teflon (or it may be silicone) to protect them. Without something covering the braid you can get problems as over time bits of dirt and grit can work their way into the gaps in the braid then slowing wear away at the line inside.

edit: I should mention that i bought them in japan on the cheap. I think the retail in japan is about 15 000 yen, and over here they are probably about $300 a set. still a good deal i reckon even at that price. particulary if bens maltech ones were $500 :P

I had braided lines on my 32 when it arrived, though for compliance reasons had to take them off. MASSIVE difference in feel of pedal. Was quite shocked, i thought the brand new lines i got made up would be very similar. Will hopefully go back to braided lines at some stage. It cost excactly twice as much for braided lines as rubber ones when i got quote. PS Have set of HKS sports braided lines for sale.

Guys please correct me if I have it wrong, but the way I see it, if hose A expands by 1.7% and hose B expands by 1%, then the conclusion is that hose A expands 70% more than B, not a .7% difference...?

So 1/1.7 = braided has only 60% of the expansion that rubber does?

Also keep in mind that the tests where probably done at room temperature not at the temperatures often seen by brake hoses (you should all know rubber gets softer with heat). Also with braided hoses being silver wouldn't they be less susceptible to transfering heat to the brake fluid.

Carlos

I think it's just a case of the journalist having some space to fill in and not actually understanding what's going on.

I have been involved and done similar tests and i know how to manipulate percentages, just measuring the expansion of the hose is not good enough. If you are going to do this type of test you must ensure each hose is the same length and new (not like the rubber hose shown). Also the machine used to do the test as shown in the article is not adequate for this type of testing, it keeps pumping pressure until its reaches it set pressure, the way it should be done is see what force is required to reach a certain pressure this will tell you how much the pressure the hose is absorbing. I’m certain a braided hose will out perform a rubber hose anytime.

omrae it sounds like you know what you are talking about....

Now I agree in total braided lines will be better than rubber....the question is, how much better.

If a new rubber line really does increase only 0.7% more than a braided one does, I am willing to bet that no-one could actually tell the difference on the track :)

If a new rubber line really does increase only 0.7% more than a braided one does, I am willing to bet that no-one could actually tell the difference on the track :)

I'll make up some number just for the sake of simplicity.

Assume the OD of the hose is 10mm.

If hose A expands to 11mm and hose B expands to 15mm:

Hose A has increased by 10%

Hose B has increased by 50%

Hose B has not increased 40% more than A, it has increased 5 times that of A.

What I'm getting at is, the rubber hose increased by 1.7%, braided >1.0%, therefore the rubber hose has increased by nearly twice what the braided line did.

cowie165 I agree mathematically 1.7% is almost twice the expansion of 1% but thats not really the point....the difference in total diameter is 1% or 1.7% which lets face it is bugger all as a percentage of total diameter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • http://calfinn.com.au/product/1500kg-standard-trolley-jack-cj-2t-c/1500kg-standard-trolley-jack-cj-2t-c   I have this and fits under a S3 33 GTR with no issues. Purchased in 2009 and not one issue. It was $950 back then. Not cheap but something so important isn’t worth cheaping out on.
    • Just trying to get my head around this. At 5psi of boost, you turn on your wmi pump, and then you're using a 3000cc injector, to allow flow upto the actual engine, where you have your 6x200cc injectors and a 500cc injector. If the above is correct, what advantage are you obtaining by having the 3000cc injector blocking flow, is this just incase a line breaks between that injector and the motor you can stop flow immediately? Or are the 6x200cc and 500cc less injectors and just spray nozzle?
    • Welcome! New member myself, but I had an R33 back in 2002. Best advice I could give, based on my experience: if you're running the factory turbo, be very conservative with boost. I made the mistake of just fiddling around with the boost controller and cranking the boost for fun, and the end result was my intake pipes popping off frequently from the constant deluge of oil that was being blown into the recirc by the stressed-out turbo, which itself was siphoning oil from the engine and farting it out both sides of its centre bearing (or something to that effect). If I could do it all again, I would have gotten a new turbo and had a tune dialled in professionally and then just left it alone! Funny you mention the metal shavings in the gearbox, as I had the same thing - the probe plug (magnetic drain plug, essentially) would come out caked with shavings. At least it was doing its job. Not sure if that's just sacrificial wear and part of the deal, or if my gearbox was shagged, but I wasn't abusing it. Enjoy the R33 - they're a dying breed, and if they weren't $35k+ on CarSales in Queensland, I might have picked up one of those again, instead of the 370GT I own now (though I'm loving the 370GT, that big 3.7L V6 just hits different).
    • Howdy folks. I owned an R33 back in 2002, which was thoroughly beyond my capacity (financially speaking) to maintain/insure, so we parted ways in 2004. Fast forward 21 years (to literally yesterday, in fact) and I'm now the proud owner of a 2007 V36 370GT. I'm happily surprised by how much power the VQ37VHR makes, compared to the RB25DET, considering the latter is turbocharged. I had planned to add a turbo at some point but I'm on the fence about whether I'll even need it (though I do love the sudden onset of extra torque). Any other 370GT owners around the traps, I'd love to hear about your experiences with this car (good and bad).
    • Perhaps the answer is... more jacks!* *proper jacks must be used.  
×
×
  • Create New...