Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That has little to do with the "Mine's knock control strategy", such as it is, so much as it is typical for old Nissan Knock sensors to be non-functional. "Mine's may well just copy paste the normal ignition map onto the knock map (which is typical stupid 90s styleeez), or they might actually have a few degrees taken out. But if the knock sensor doesn't hear anything, the ECU doesn't do anything.

I have deliberately provoked knock on both an RB20 and a 25Neo and not seen the ECU do shit.

I'm not surprised given how old these ECU's are. My Haltech pro plug in can't even do knock control. Sure its listed in the spec sheet and when you go in the software you'll find it, but it's garbage. It wasn't until the Elite ECU's that the knock control actually worked as intended (provided you also had knock ears to calibrate/verify what you were seeing in the ECU data). 

  • 9 months later...
On 18/8/2022 at 4:25 PM, GTSBoy said:

I thought I would come back to this. No-one with more than 0.5 functioning brain cells has ever thought it was a good idea to use a Mine's ECU in anything at any time. They are a fool's errand.

We have 100 octane fuel here in Adelaide (united, portrush rd) I believe it’s 98 & e85 blended. I remember using it profusely in my early turbo days. 
 

If someone had 100 ron fuel, would this make the mines ecus a possible choice?

I’ve always wondered, cheers

 

 

17 minutes ago, s213b said:

If someone had 100 ron fuel, would this make the mines ecus a possible choice?

I’ve always wondered, cheers

100 is hardly sufficiently better than 98 to make it worth considering, especially when it's only available at that one spot.

I just don't know why anyone would consider a fixed, unknown quantity tune when you can just put a Nistune into a Nissan ECU and make it do what you want it to do.

  • Like 2

Yeah I agree, those pre-tuned ECUs from the 80s and 90s are a pretty dangerous thing, a bit like the flash tunes many modern cars allow. They assume everything in your 30 year old car is working perfectly and remove most of the safety margin that nissan built in to give you a couple of % more power.

Since the ECU didn't control boost they can't make a major difference like you can get in a flash tune for a modern turbo car, eg a diesel ute

I've got uprevs in both my N/A Titan and Fuga and can't feel any difference in the power delivered, and in both cases they are a bit safer because there are wide band o2 sensors from factory to do some adjustment if there are fuel delivery issues.

15 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

100 is hardly sufficiently better than 98 to make it worth considering, especially when it's only available at that one spot.

I just don't know why anyone would consider a fixed, unknown quantity tune when you can just put a Nistune into a Nissan ECU and make it do what you want it to do.

Well you can’t nistune every skyline ecu as we know. 
 

10 years ago, I had a mines ecu and a copy of everything it was tuned for, which matched my car perfectly, and easy access to 100ron fuel, and still people said don’t use it. Didn’t make sense to me. Still doesn’t. If you use the wrong fuel for your tune you’ll blow your motor, that’s always been a fact.
 

but yes correct, I wouldn’t chase one now, but if the circumstances were fitting I don’t see why they’re the paperweight everyone claims them to be. 

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

Nobody cares about R33s.

And if they do, they can always use an R32 ECU for Nistune.

At this point why bother trying to buy an R32 ECU + Nistune board + Nistune license when that gets you most of the way to a Haltech E2500 or Nexus R3? I'm probably biased though, I decided I would rather put the energy into trying to do a true port of the factory tune to Haltech rather than mess with Nistune.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you not seen geospy.ai? It can now give GPS co ords to within a metre from a photo, even if it's a random photo you take inside. Supposedly at the moment only the government/law enforcement has access to that... Supposedly...
    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
×
×
  • Create New...