Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

dyno.JPG

R33 GTS-T Auto

Pod

FMIC

EBC

High graph = high setting on EBC

Low graph = low setting on EBC (max 175rwkw or so)

As you can see, the high setting is poor on the lower end.

Does anyone have any suggestions on ways I can solve this issue?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/96547-analyse-my-dyno-graph/
Share on other sites

wink i friend of mine is running a WOLF 3d in his auto as it has the out puts to run the auto (but i'm no fan of the wolf)

SAFC 2 would be my suggesting, not to $$ second hand and in the right hands can be tuned pretty quickly for reasonable results. Plus with fuel prices like they are now it would most likely paid to get it done. Whats your fuel consumption like with the map running 10:1 when i would think 12.5:1 would be much closer to the mark for a light tuned rb.

pete

wink i friend of mine is running a WOLF 3d in his auto as it has the out puts to run the auto

The PFC also has "outputs to run the auto", no big deal there. The problem is no aftermarket ECU (that I have found) has the shift logic programmed to cut/retard the ignition on gearchanges. I have driven autos with Motec's, Autronics, Wolfs and PFC's and none of them have decent shift quality. They are all very jerky at low throttle openings and have lots of slippage at larger throttle openings. The more power, the worse the slippage. All but one have now had gearbox rebuilds in fairly short intervals.

In the Stagea I have a Jaycar DFA for fuel tuning, a Jaycar IEBC for boost control and an Apexi SITC for ignition tuning. That's a glove box full of piggy backs, but the gearchanges are as good as standard and the gearbox is still alive and kicking.

:P cheers :)

Emanage is better than safc cause you can get it with a ingnision timing

harness

now after that you will need a shif kit

fuel pump reg and injectors

make a box for your pod

hiflow turbo

good for 220rwkw at least on a good turn not maxed out

james

Wink - easily said, as others have but you seem to be missing the point.

PowerFC - dont bother, its possible, but with major side affects you dont want

S-AFC - is what you want and will fix your problem with a little tuning

Wink also is that with your foot flat on the floor to get full throtal

when mine was at 12psi it would pop

i have set it to 10 and now my power band is heaps better

stock ecu cant handle much more than that nether can the turbo

no mention of an exhaust system

james

I forgot to mention the car is also running a 3" turbo back but only stock cat.

It seems general consensus is that a SAFC is the way to go.

However miller brings up the GReddy E-Manage.

The E-Manage costs around the same as a SAFC so can someone give me a quick comparo of the features/differences.

In the end, E-Manage (with Ignition harness) vs SAFC + ITC.

Thank you all for your informative input. Appreciate it! :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...