Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is a bit of talk about this around but for those of you who don't leav the Vic section Shell have release a 100 RON fuel, the first in Aus. Only issue here is they have added 5% Ethanol. I'm not sure what issues if any this can cause for us skyline drivers but I'd be interested to hear what people have to say

Also keen to know price of it compared to say standard unleaded...

Cut from Shells website -

"Shell Optimax Extreme is a new super-high octane fuel with a minimum octane rating of 100, the highest currently available at any Australian service station. Shell Optimax Extreme is formulated with 5% ethanol.

Shell Optimax Extreme is formulated to deliver more engine responsiveness, sharper acceleration and enhanced power in many modern and high performance vehicles compared to other Shell premium fuels.

Ethanol is a renewable non-fossil fuel produced in Australia. When used in fuel it’s a cleaner burning, renewable component that helps to reduce Greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, through the formulation with ethanol, Shell Optimax Extreme has a substantially lower sulphur and benzene content than the maximum levels set under the Federal Government’s fuel quality standards. Ethanol is a cleaner burning, renewable fuel component that helps to reduce Greenhouse gas emissions."

Shell Optimax Extreme will initially be available at selected Coles Express sites in the Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra.

Link - http://www.shell.com/home/Framework?siteId...ut_extreme.html

Link regarding compatibility for "local" cars - http://www.fcai.com.au/ethanol.php/2005/11/00000005.html

Interesting read - http://autorepair.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/aa102100a.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/96631-shell-optimax-extreme-100-octane/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Theres a massive thread on this somewhere......

But yeah, mixed results, some ppl reckon the car pings etc, but when the car is tuned, better results.

Ofcourse Nissan wouldn't endorse it, why would they risk it and open themselves up to potential lawsuits.....

i didnt think higher RON increased performance. The RON of the fuel from my understanding does not increase power alone.. i thought it just meant u can tune the car for more power. I thought it was the way the fuel burns. ie. how well it burns etc.

but its been out for a while and i remember some mates who did testing at their uni on petrols which had ethanol and depending on the %'s added was clean and ran fine.

we've been using 10% blended fuels lately cause theyre upto 10c+ cheaper then normal... but the risk of issues coming up are a little greater but then again it once again depends on how much is blended. Mind u for skylines and turbo cars i wouldnt use it... the 100 shell i would... cause its just 98ron with a 5% blend which is stuff all.

Refer here, for effects of using ethanol blends.

Nissan Aust. doesn't recommend the use of this fuel in pre 04 vehicles, but they do not state why. It would be nice if they just outlined the problem areas.

That just outlines problems with a 20% blend. Also I believe Nissan discourages the use of 10% blend.

Optimax Extreme is a 5% blend, which as far as I know is quite safe to use in just about any car.

Edited by shyster

far less if not none...

im pretty sure some racing fuels use ethanol.

here... like i was trying to say it just lessens the risk of knocking (higher RON) so that means u can tune your engine more to gain more power BUT higher octane fuels wont give u more power alone

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

A common myth amongst petrol consumers is that adding a higher octane fuel to a vehicle's engine will increase its performance and/or lessen its fuel consumption; this is mostly false—engines perform best when using fuel with the octane rating they were designed for and any increase in performance by using a fuel with a different octant rating is minimal.

so unless your car is tuned for 100RON your wasting your time buying it based on "performance gains", however if your car is tuned for 98 then this will mean you will be quite safe from knocking.

In regards to corrosive effect on metal fuel parts, this is from the Shell's website FAQ...

I have heard reported in the media issues with ethanol and engine corrosion and its effect on metal parts. What steps are you taking to protect my engine and its components?

The issues you have heard about relate to a situation in 2003 when some retailers were selling fuel products with more than 20% ethanol blend without sufficient disclosure to customers.  Shell was not involved in this practice and took active steps at the time to promote that our fuel did not contain ethanol.  It has now been shown through extensive testing and research that a maximum 10% ethanol content is suitable for many cars which is why the Federal Government has set a maximum 10% ethanol content in Australian fuel.  Shell has determined that a formulation of 5% ethanol optimises Shell Optimax Extreme (the same level that Governments in Europe are encouraging in their specification).  All ethanol used in Shell fuel contains a suitable corrosion inhibitor.

Now if the Optimax Extreme may not sound too bad for metal parts, in regards to rubber fuel parts shrinkage issue, perhaps changing all your fuel lines, basicaly anything that is made from rubber, to braided steel lines. Of course it's recommended to use ADR approved ones, e.g. made by Maltech in Geelong, whom some of us has organised a group buy with.

It's more expensive than normal optimax....wth?

I thought the whole point of blending ethanol was to reduce the overall cost of the petrol....i think Shell may just be targeting the performance market....

Also, check out this guys dyno results after a tune, hell if I could get those results just after a "tune" I'm all for it.......

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=95349

i thought it would be obvious that nissan is going to say dont use it...

compare it to the "this product may contain traces of peanuts" thing

when half the stuff that says it would never have a peanut anywhere near it....they say that to cover their ass in the worst case scenario etc...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
    • Yep that is correct. It allows you to adjust the short throw range from what I can tell
×
×
  • Create New...