Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Today at bel i got a power fc install and tune, only mods are k&n panel and bov.

I got 153rwkw and 435Nm torque (r34 gtt), does this seem a bit low for the power output?

ive heard of ppl getting 170's with just power fc but ive been told it depends on the type of dyno and run?

one of the bel guys told me hes seen cars get 180+ and only 140+ kw on thier dyno, so how does that work? :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/
Share on other sites

im no car expert.. but it sounds like there might be one of ya problems..

If you got like a 3" turboback exhaust it could add about 20kw or so..

153 + 20 = 173.. seems like a better result :)

im also no dyno expert either :D but ya tuning people were probably just giving you some story to make ya happy with the result....

also when you do get the exhaust they will have to retune the PFC again.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1779498
Share on other sites

Morgs is correct, differnt dyno's read differntly and dynolog dyno do read lower than others, but whos to say that the dynolog dyno is incorrect, could it be that the dynodynamics dyno is measuring way to high?....all i can say is continue to use the same dyno every time so you can see the difference in mods regardless of what the total Hp is in relation to others

Edited by Zenith
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1780085
Share on other sites

153 with a stock exhaust is as much as you can expect.

first person ive heard also thats done a PFC before exhaust

I did DFA, SITC and IEBC before the exhaust on the Stagea, does that count?

33% power increase with zero mechanical mods.

:blink: cheers :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1780159
Share on other sites

my mechanic uses dynolog and with a power fc, 13psi, exhaust, pod, fmic i got 170rwkw which i know most guys are usually a tad over the 200rwkw on a normal dyno dynamics in shoot out mode, also my mechanic agreed with me that his reads alot lower and mainly uses it as a tuning tool not really to see how hi figures he can get,

then again ive heard of some dyno dynamics figures that are rediculously high, like 1 guy claiming to have 215rwkw on 10psi, fmic, power fc, exhaust and pod, i just cant see that happenin

yer stick to the same dyno for more consistent records

ben...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1780167
Share on other sites

thanks for all the feedback.

i got pfc before exhaust coz i was running very rich and getting bad fuel economy, was worried i might have a problem but tune fixed everything :) ; also once i get exhaust etc its a hourly rate for dyno tune, so no $500 fee everytime i want a tune :P

i didnt get a dyno run before pfc install, only before pfc tune amd i went from 138rwkw to 153rwkw and from 210Nm min 420Nm max torque to 302 Nm min 435Nm max.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1780785
Share on other sites

Does it really matter unless you are a dyno queen?. Dyno shymo.When i last looked,a dyno is a tuning tool.If you go to the same dyno with the same(honest) tuner and correction factors are correct and there is no "X" factor input,who cares.Provided it reads consistently,it is a excellent tuning tool.However a whole industry has been built around the "my dad is tougher than yours and my shitter made more Kilowatts than yours".Hey book it in,lean it out,bang some timing in and look at the top end power increase (and overlay it over original power run graph).and they cant get the cash out fast enough.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1787865
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok. Can anyone out there shed some light on this dyno sheet.

300.jpg

Looking at the IT and AT is it fair to assume the numbers are a bit higher then what the thing would make on an engine dyno?

I tend to think, they have done a few runs at different boost levels, and the inlet temos could be getting up there.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1906283
Share on other sites

i made 35 rwkw's changing my exhaust

i believe my second exhaust (blitz jobby) was probably as restrictive, if not more than the stocko unit

when i ditched it for a 3" straight through exhaust (and retune, which wasnt cheap) power reading was much better

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1906562
Share on other sites

The intake temp probe just sits next to the air filter, so assuming it was a bonnet up run i wouldn't expect more than about 10 degrees different even with an unenclosed pod no matter the time on the dyno.

However, if the bonnet was down it is probably a legitimate power figure for an unenclosed pod.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97967-different-dynos/#findComment-1906563
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...