Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok now i havnt said im doing it. i wanted to know who has dun it so all u f**k heads keep your comments 2 your self

hahaaa first you post this on a public forum then tell people to keep there comments to themselves wtf? you iq sounds lower than the springs ya want to cut lol

ok now i havnt said im doing it. i wanted to know who has dun it so all u f**k heads keep your comments 2 your self

come here with a f**k head topic, your gonna get these "f**k head" replies dude.

Chopping springs is for morons, there arent any around here, so its highly unlikely.

Find your local Commodore/Ford club and go ask them.

Why is it so important anyhow?

I've cut my rears. 3 out of 8 coils. Made it sit n look really good but the handling was crap. The only reason I cut it was coz i was ordering the new Whiteline kit and just wanted to see what it feels like before the kit arives.

My recomendation is DON'T do it as you'll regret it.

In my experience, absolutely no problem to cut a coil off a spring. As long as the coil is still captive in the suspension, at full droop, it will not fall out. In fact I bought some lowered springs (name-brand) that were not quite captive, and they never fell out. Only problem was they sat the car too close to the bumpstops.

As long as you are sensible about it, then it is not a problem.

The major problem is when tools cut half the spring away.

i did it once

I used to drive a VN as a first car and one day me & a mate took them out and chopped them just to see what it would be like. We cut the rears by 2 coils (we had spare springs).

Better handling - $0

Better looks - $0

The look on the mechanics face when the springs fall clean out when car is up on the hoist - $ Priceless

In short, don't do it. Its dangerous and will cause u to crash if u drive too fast with them in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...