Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

That answer i gave ive known that for about 2 years and ive always thoght that was right. Has anyone got PROOF of where the name came from ?

As I said in my original post, its actually on the cover of the Wheels magazine that the R32 GT-R was reviewed in. Back in 1989.

They made mention of it in the last half a year, with the GTR Proto release. I'll see if I can find that page and take a photo of it (I don't have a scanner).

hehe.... its a cool tag if it can get so many imaginations going ....

as scathing mentioned its for all to see on the front cover of the mag...

we should all have patend it because there was a wave of aftermarket products available once upon a time ....

As i first mentioned well done the r32 for gaining such a title that the rest want and have depending on how you look at it

its our title ...we penned it and we used it for A R32 review ...end of story!

Does the word 'Godzilla' have any meaning? If so, what is it?

Godzilla is the name of the giant sea-monster that is the star of a series of hit Japanese sci-fi movies. There are a few different stories as to where the name came from. It seems to have been made by combining two Japanese words - gorira, meaning 'gorilla,' and kujira, meaning 'whale,' to make the Japanese name 'Gojira.' In English, this name is written 'Godzilla.' So, you can see that, at least in name, Godzilla is half-gorilla and half-whale. Some people also say that originally the name was used as a nickname for a large man who worked at the movie studios where the Godzilla movies were made. You can find more information on Godzilla by checking out Hi-Tech Japan.

its always amusing to see guys from the US and UK try and be clever around japanese folk and refer to the GTR as Godzilla, only to get puzzled looks in return.

So who wants to figure out what to call a KPGC10? great grandpa zilla?

Ah, found it.

The middle column reads:

"July 1989. The cover of Wheels carried the GT-R. "Nissan's new Godzilla on wheels..." ran the coverlines. It was a name so apt that it stuck. Our opening news pages reported that the Japanese already had a name for the car. Obakemono, the monster. From there it was an easy jump to the word that for English speakers conjures a particularly Japanese monster."

:D @ scathing

post-14114-1139705164.jpg

oh come on where s my thumbs up cowie165.....Scathing did clarify the media i was meaning though .... :D

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

oops i realised now he beat me to it ....sorry !

Edited by ishh
As far as i know the japanese did call them godzilla. The name came from the unpredicable nature of the ATTESSA system. Eg. When you push them hard through corners they can bite back if you are not careful and spin out.

Saw this happen to a newbie so yes deserve the monster tag

GODZILLA was coined for the r32 so as far as i am concerned it is the only model that deserves to be called godzilla look at the specs in stock trim the 32 was quicker 1/4 mile times than the 33 or 34 so they are lesser monsters still monsters but not godillas :P

Edited by gazza750

The GTR was never really intended to be a drag car, but a track car so that is of little importance.

In fact the modern cars have improved so much that in a BMI track battle the GTR32 was almost handed its ass by a V35 350GT while the R33, Evo, STi and R34 cleared out completely. The GTR33 was also more then 20 seconds faster at the 'Ring and the way Gan San throws it around with some insane driving shows the confidence of the improved chassis on the racetrack. Demonstrates the value of improvement.

Also if the 32 is so great, how come there were none racing at Calder last night while a GTR33 set fastest time? Oh sure there were no drags but come on...... :P

You guys have such an inferiority complex :(

right back at ya GTRgeoff with the complex thing i think ! what has phsycology got to do with car tags is my question?.... its for everyone to veiw as how ever they see fit.

Twice you have mentioned it (inferiority complex) ...we get it ok !

ahahahah i got a gozilla and you havent ... that shouldnt offend you one bit then ! :P

this was never a debate about the better car but stock, the r32 is way more race breed.... i certainly have no complex as i could've boughtt a r33, a real nice one but in my mind it wasent the classic godzilla ...and thats just me !!! We dont have complex's because we have godzillas you trippa !

Edited by ishh

" In fact the modern cars have improved so much that in a BMI track battle the GTR32 was almost handed its ass by a V35 350GT while the R33, Evo, STi and R34 cleared out completely. The GTR33 was also more then 20 seconds faster at the 'Ring and the way Gan San throws it around with some insane driving shows the confidence of the improved chassis on the racetrack. Demonstrates the value of improvement. "

Lets step back just for a minute! How can you compare a car that came from an 80's designs to something like an V35 350Gt?? Yes the 33 might be better but lets not forget the 32 came before the 33 so lessons learned on the 32 helped make the 33 better to a degree. But you did agree with that! haha, Im just on the 32 guys side!!

That article posted above came out just before the 92 Bathurst and was talking about how a std road GTR measured up against the race car, and claimed it was quicker to 60km/h then the GrpA Sierra / Commodores etc. :(

It commented on howe the car was a spectacular failure for Nissan in the showroom...Little did the article realise that it would be years later that the Aus motoring public would embrace the GTR.

I have that and the original 89 artcile in a box somewhere...i just couldnt accpet it was a better car then my dream VN Grp A Commodore ;):P:( :lol:

vnGrpA-Wall1024.jpg

well i see it as the r32 being the original godzilla

but as technology advances obviously the next model is goin to have better so and so.

so other gtrs should b allowed to have the name godzilla, coz its still a GTR!

what happens when u pour water in a cup?it becomes the cup.

be water my friends, be water

I think the word godzilla was used to describle r32 because it was a monster of a car, because of the massive power capabilties and could eat up corners for breakfast. its a metaphor!!

The way I see it is the r32 gtr can be beaten by an r33 gtr, and an r34 gtr can beat them both. Therefore they all deserve the right to be named GODZILLA!!!

So there I've answered the question with some logic.

post-26629-1139733696.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...