Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

imagine throwing one of them engines into an xr6 and making it 4wd turbo.

that'd be a nice little project.

Niiiice idea! Almost an Aussie WRX equivalent (notice I DIDN'T say an Aussie GT-R eqiv'? The idea wouldn't equate to a Group A tourer...or could it?). Any takers?

245kW and 480Nm performance pack and a bonnet air inlet to signal the extra go.

It is available only as an all-wheel-drive, six-speed automatic.

a standard ford xr6t is around the 240kw mark anyway. would it be possible to use the drivetrain to make a standard xr6t 4wd?

if ford released an xr6t 4wd i'd buy one.

Edited by SECUR1TY
LoL

Got fuel bill?!

The Ford territory's are suprisngly good on fuel. 12.8 for the awd or 12.2 for the rwd.

No doubt being the turbo it will use slightly more but driven well it will return the same economy as its n/a version.

This has been proven to be true with the skylines and xrt fords so why should it be any different with the territory. :(

I can see myself building a pretty lame territory.

:( hehe..

So what the fuss about? a turbo tank is not a new thing.. Ever heard of a Nissan Patrol?? what a performance vehicle those are!! :(

Factory claimed 12L/100kms. tongue.gif

hehe.. I love the new average thing they have got going.. so if you do city driving expect about 16L/100km.. country, then maybe down to 10L/100km..

I think we all agree that claimed fuel usage is just that... claimed.. Actual will more often than not be much worse! However, as far as its direct competition goes, it should be a good package =)

Note: I'm NOT a Ford fan at all =D

The R32 RB20DET is claimed to have 10.5L/100km's. I used to achieve that with the stockish rb20det.

Even now after its been tuned, injectors replaced as the others were stuffed, o2 sensor replaced its now getting 10.6L/100km's with the rb30det.

Prior with the buggered injectors it was getting 13-14L/100km's towards the end.

The oldies V8 100series Landcruiser.. Rated at 16L/100km's, that gets 17L/100km's, and my old dear is a lead foot. She loves that toyo v8 growl. :(

I think the average is a fairly good indicator.

The Territory being only slightly heavier than the Falcon it shouldn't be much different, possibly highspeed cruise may due to aero thats about it.

The R32 RB20DET is claimed to have 10.5L/100km's. I used to achieve that with the stockish rb20det.

my R32 on its 2L did 15L/100km city driving.. about 11L/100km highway. Piece of crap 2L :( there was a massive difference between highway and city, and i drove it nearly all city.. as would your average Territory family car.

So I think the country driving averaging out the shitty city fuel economy is misleading..and it should be broken down as per the old days.

Around town my RB25DET will average 12-14L/100k's easily, not sure what it's claimed usage is. That to me seems about right for a car of it's weight and with a regular PSSHT =)

Woops, getting off topic =) Yeah Turbo Territory... Yet another over powered family car =\ I'm gonna need to mod my car up just to keep speed with traffic =\

Edited by ActionDan

I only ever drive mine locally... No open road.

15L per 100 is pretty damn bad.. To the usual 50litres thats around 330-340km's per tank.

Depending on how much I am stuck up it I get no lower than 410-430kays per 50litres. Thats a lot of spirited hills driving.

General driving to work/uni and back up to the oldies I get pretty much spot on 470km's per tank.

The rb20det was pretty much the same.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
    • It sounds like you want what the Toyota Landcruisers have for their roof racks. Wanna know what you end up with? Rust holes in the roof, and water everywhere...
    • Discovered today that if I select reverse first and take my foot off the brake, then select drive, the drive indicator light works and so does the tiptronic gear indicator. 
    • Ok so after much research and talking with knowledgeable people I've got my turbo conversion done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.  Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd. But nothing drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic.  I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Does anyone here have any ideas?   Cheers guys
×
×
  • Create New...