Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'll be finishing the Cefiro with the RB25DE + T70 later today so I'll scan that when we're done.

Last reading was 249 rwkw @ 17 psi

Completely STOCK RB25DE with a T70 600hp, 600x300x100 FMIC, GTR Injectors, Z32 AFM, Desno 600 hp Fuel Pump, Remapped R32 GTST ECU, and that's it.

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ebay turbos are BAD......have a look at these links

http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110947

I think the funniest thing about that pic is they had to stamp the word "TURBO" into the housing, just in case you're not sure what it actually is. Like "nah, it's really a turbo! honest! just read the letters!" ;)

Bear in mind that Canberra is comparatively high altitude, so the BP should be lower.

Check your barrometer, i dont think it would ever go to 930. Currently in Canberra its 1023, With cyclone Tracey coming it might get down to 980 at its worst.

  • 1 month later...

Well I just found this thread...

The passage has so far made 303.9rwkws on 16psi (not with stock injectors) but with stock internals and has done 300+ at 3 different dyno locations. As for all the weather men, Canberra is at 93-96BP it is at altitude and is the true reading, (most weather reports measure at sea level) you can see all the summernats dyno sheets are around that reading.

KKR is a little laggy cuz its big, but for bang for the buck its unreal....Nismoid and others are just pissed they spent 5 zero's and have ball park same power.

KKR all the way

Possible 340rwkws at 20psi but also possible boom with stock internals.

A little bit of info is dangerous huh?

G.

whilst your graph certainly proves max power is possible it still doesnt prove much else.

you said yourself its a laggy mofo. average power makes the car quick on the street, not peaky power like the KKR that you've posted.

the info is hardly dangerous nor does it prose a threat to anyone else on this forums that insists on using corret turbochargers for their application

sounds like it would suck on the street (lag city)

whilst your graph certainly proves max power is possible it still doesnt prove much else.

you said yourself its a laggy mofo. average power makes the car quick on the street, not peaky power like the KKR that you've posted.

the info is hardly dangerous nor does it prose a threat to anyone else on this forums that insists on using corret turbochargers for their application

sounds like it would suck on the street (lag city)

Won't debate that, not run a 1/4 yet.. On R31 I never said it was lightning just posted power.

G.

KKR is a little laggy cuz its big,

KKR 480 is not big. A GT42 is big, a t04z is big

A KKR is firmly in GT30 (Garrett and HKS) territory which is a medium sized turbo upgrade family.

Same as TD06's and other turbo brands, which looking at results on this forum, dont even come close.

Do you actually have any technical knowledge to share as to why it is so late to deliver power?

Or are you gonna pretend its because its "big" (which has been established, that it isnt)

Im pissed off :) news to me.

Im actually quite amused you can sit here and try and pass it off as a viable upgrade

I had useable power some... 2500rpm earlier. Or maybe 3000rpm.

Its just so hard to tell with your graph as its got the powerband of a turbo double its size

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1144976656.jpg

Go run a time then come back and tell us how good it is.

You'll find yourself falling into a hole inbetween gear changes so im predicting a time in the 13-sec zone

Until then, its a paper weight in terms of a performance upgrade without some evidence

KKR 480 is not big. A GT42 is big, a t04z is big

A KKR is firmly in GT30 (Garrett and HKS) territory which is a medium sized turbo upgrade family.

Same as TD06's and other turbo brands, which looking at results on this forum, dont even come close.

Do you actually have any technical knowledge to share as to why it is so late to deliver power?

Or are you gonna pretend its because its "big" (which has been established, that it isnt)

Im pissed off :D news to me.

Im actually quite amused you can sit here and try and pass it off as a viable upgrade

I had useable power some... 2500rpm earlier. Or maybe 3000rpm.

Its just so hard to tell with your graph as its got the powerband of a turbo double its size

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1144976656.jpg

Go run a time then come back and tell us how good it is.

You'll find yourself falling into a hole inbetween gear changes so im predicting a time in the 13-sec zone

Until then, its a paper weight in terms of a performance upgrade without some evidence

With the modded actuator its boosting from 2800RPM so if you are 3000 under that, then I'm impressed :D

And I told you that you are pissed :nyaanyaa:

PS Why so hostile on KKR did one rape your sister or skyline :laugh:

With the modded actuator its boosting from 2800RPM so if you are 3000 under that, then I'm impressed :(

And I told you that you are pissed :(

PS Why so hostile on KKR did one rape your sister or skyline :D

If it starts building @2800 and takes what... 3000rpm to build to 20psi...

I dunno how else to term un-responsive

If it starts building @2800 and takes what... 3000rpm to build to 20psi...

I dunno how else to term un-responsive

Yep 2800 with the big boot at 5000rpm (on 16psi)

In the process of gettin some hoops for the strip I'll see how we go.

G.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
×
×
  • Create New...