Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The production car series in NSW runs under CAMS 3E rules, same as GTP (although they allowed some changes).

100% stock except:

saftey gear

shocks and springs

diffs

ECU

Brake Pads

Sump

Which is almost identical to the targa regs the gtr runs under except for free brakes.

Eligibility is approved by the street sedan club in NSW, we have some jap imports like a pulsar gtir and a mazda familia running with the rest

But IPRA suits a gtst much better...good luck.

I think Lawrence and yourself have made a fundamental misinterpretation of the class rules. My interpretation is that the R32 GTR is eligible, but the R32 GTSt is not....simply because they are distinctly different models and that's what the class rules dictate. Granted they are from the same model series, but they aren't the same model (Nissan certainly see it that way). AFAIC the stewards made the right call and, frankly, if I were a fellow competitor, I'd protest your car as soon as I became aware of it. No offence, but that's just pit politics :D

Yeh, you're right but thay aren't different models as such, just different options of the same base car like Commodore Executive and Clubsport. You can rock up in an Executive with a 6 litre Chevy engine, no differnt me think! Some weren't happy at the time, more so with Garwood's EVO VI than mine bucket of bolts. I was pretty raw in 01 having done just 1 race meet and 4 Targa's and only went to the Nationals because Lawrence said I couls run. Targa Class has been a saviour though here for lots of cars and is heaps bigger now than IP here just because of Targa itself.

It's morally true in relation to GTS-t's and GTR's but 808's are VERY different cars to RX-7's too but it's ok to run an 808 with an RX-7 engine etc!! The rules aren't consistent and if it is true production racing then all cars should run the engine they were made with, shouldn't they?

It just seems that some makes have a lot more freedom than others and late model cars are disadvantaged by restrictors and weight, evident by the cold hard fact that not many cars made in the last 15 years are competitive, which makes no sense when you think how far production road cars have come in that time.

Enough about my griping, are you racing anything currently?

Cheers

well...back on your gripe....I disagree

Improved production, Production, Sports Sedans are the main touring car categories and each of them suits different cars. Basically its up the competitor to choose and race a competitive car.

It woudn't be fair to the competitors already at the front of the category (say a S2 Rx7) if the rules were changed and all of a sudden their car could not win any more.

Sydneykid is involved with a GTR running in improved production, and while they have done well they cannot consistently win. Despite the fact that a GTR is undoubtedly one of the quickest cars out there. Its just the rules and they have to work within them

The production car series in NSW runs under CAMS 3E rules, same as GTP (although they allowed some changes).

100% stock except:

saftey gear

shocks and springs

diffs

ECU

Brake Pads

Sump

Which is almost identical to the targa regs the gtr runs under except for free brakes.

Eligibility is approved by the street sedan club in NSW, we have some jap imports like a pulsar gtir and a mazda familia running with the rest

But IPRA suits a gtst much better...good luck.

Thanks heaps for that, I've got the manual out right now! I sit on the Tas Racing Drivers Club committee and we are the affiliated IPRA body in Tas. I'll ask our national delegate next week to find out what it will take to get GTS-t's on the list. I notice Silvia's are now ok. (pity CAMS can't spell it!!). There are just as many if not more GTS-t's in OZ so who knows.

Might see you at a track in NSW one day

Cheers

well...back on your gripe....I disagree

Improved production, Production, Sports Sedans are the main touring car categories and each of them suits different cars. Basically its up the competitor to choose and race a competitive car.

It woudn't be fair to the competitors already at the front of the category (say a S2 Rx7) if the rules were changed and all of a sudden their car could not win any more.

Sydneykid is involved with a GTR running in improved production, and while they have done well they cannot consistently win. Despite the fact that a GTR is undoubtedly one of the quickest cars out there. Its just the rules and they have to work within them

Yes, but remember that all these cars racing Targa Class were never built for the circuit including mine. They were Targa' cars 1st and foremost where owners of competitive Targa cars want to get more use out of them, that's all. All the front running IP cars would do jack s*** in Targa under it's rules, where Classic plays 2nd fiddle to modern, so that's what you buy and build up.

So they have chosen to a race a competitive car, road race. Not saying the RX-7 should be uncompetitive just level up the playing field a little, Rotaries rule the class.

It woudn't be fair to the competitors already at the front of the category (say a S2 Rx7) if the rules were changed and all of a sudden their car could not win any more.

Didn't stop CAMS & ARCom making the Porsche 911 GT3, GT2 and Turbo, as well as the Lamborghini Gallardo uncompetitive under the recently released Tarmac Rally Regs!

I thougt this would stir up some stuff, and I am glad for that.

There are 2 issues here;

1. The R32GTST is elligble for IP racing, because it is an approved (High Performance) import by DOTARS. You just apply to your IP committee to have it included on the list. Same as the guys did for the Silvia, you will have no problem getting support for that application.

The same applies to R33GTST, R33GTR, R34GTT, R34GTR etc

But the above is not the real problem......

2. Even if the R32GTST was elligible it would be uncompetitive because it would have to run a single 36 mm restrictor. That means a power limit of around 360 bhp (210 rwkw) and a useable rpm band up to 6,000 rpm.

We survive with the R32GTR in IP because it has twin turbos standard, so is allowed to run 2 X 27 mm restrictors. That allows a little more power and a slightly higher useable rpm range. The 4wd then gives us a big jump off the start. For the same reason the tyres last a little longer. But the weight and the restricted top speed means we get caught up and killed fairly quickly. The longer the straight, the quicker the death.

My issue is I have been arguing this for 4 years, but when the IP Committe is 80% rotary drivers and the 2 elligibility officers are also rotary drivers, you don't get a lot of understanding. They aren't allowed to run Peripheral Ports, so we can suffer the restrictor problem. They have no sympathy for the Late Model issue, there are no late Model rotary Touring Cars, they are Sports Cars (except the Cosmo of course).

In NSW and Vic the Late Model turbo guys have enough trackdays, super sprints, drifting, drags etc to compete at, so they don't care. In Tas and WA they have created their own classes. WA was supposed to be finished last year but they lobbied and got their "Street Car" class continued.

Until every IP committe in the country is full of Late Model Turbo car drivers, we won't get anywhere. Hence my "bat and ball" analogy, you can't change it from outside, only from inside will we succeed.

:P Cheers :D

PS; PL claims the R32GTST was entered as an "R32". The entry was accepted because everyone assumed it was a GTR. When it got to scrutineering it was too late, or so PL claims. I never knew about the Stewards hearing, they suppress that stuff pretty well.

Edited by Sydneykid
Didn't stop CAMS & ARCom making the Porsche 911 GT3, GT2 and Turbo, as well as the Lamborghini Gallardo uncompetitive under the recently released Tarmac Rally Regs!

umm I don't think any of those cars will have issues being competitive under the new regs. They might have to be pretty stock but they are pretty quick stock :P

umm I don't think any of those cars will have issues being competitive under the new regs. They might have to be pretty stock but they are pretty quick stock :happy:

Talk to the entrants of these cars and you'll find they don't share you opinion. As we have until 2008 to sort the new regs I'm sure it will be rectified before anyone has to fire sale a GT3!

Well I'm still willing to wait until the results are in under the new regs, I am pretty confident that those cars will fill the top 10.....

I have no doubt of that Duncan, but being in the top ten doesn't really mean you have a chance of winning anything; look at Targa Tasmania 2005 - third place finished almost nine minutes ahead of fourth!

IT DOESN"T TAKE LONG...

.... before a do gooder has to have his two Bobs worth. Rules are written by people who try to give time and effort to facilitate our sport. It is then up to the people who didn't write the rules to use them to their advantage.

I have been in motorsport for years and found most of the protests come from team midfield talentless losers.

Two Sugars have done something that was sadley lacking in Tassy - Given people with once a year cars a chance to run 7 times per year. I would suggest that if you wanted to compete nationally, you would build your car to suit.

3000 plus spectators at a Club Day... White Hot handicapping, people who would rather have a beer after the event and talk about how to attract more to the next event than winge or spend hours in stewards enquireys mean we have grass roots motorsport on an island with less people than some Sydney suburbs.

Why we even have Vics making the trip.

Keep your pit politics SteveL, keep them up there on the North Island. We are busy looking for the next Ambrose, Bowe, Goss, White en all.

Duncan, I think once the Tarmac scene is over run with factory teams, the top ten will be populated by same... However, you can run your GT-R on the same road the same day as JR & Co and say "This year I was 10 seconds closer to Jim than last year... he is good and I'm having fun" The jury is still out on the rules, but I will garantee one thing - they wont please everyone.

Skyd, thanks for all your help in the past... and thanks for sticking to the facts

Tom

Absolutely brilliant!!

This should be in VIC. I would be there with bells on.

I have been wanting move up a rung on the pyramid of speed (I currently only do club sprints), but have been unexcited at the prospect of restricting my currently extremely-fun-to-drive WRX to fit into IP. It seems quite unlikely that a WRX will be competitive in this series and I don't find anything attractive about going into a sport (series) when there is little chance of success.

I may have misinterpreted some of the previous comments. However, I am all for - if the rules don't suit take your bat and ball and start a new game. That to me is common sense. If other people start lining up to play your new game, then you have probably done a good thing.

I have been watching the IP Late Model debate for a while and it seems that there has been a bit of lobbying over the past couple of years (please correct me if I'm wrong). It would seem that the series is still weighted toward non-turbo and earlier model vehicles. That's great and I don't necessarily see the benefit of changing rules in a series that is working and potentially causing disadvantage to the current competitors. (Besides that, it seems to a chicken-or-egg thing... if there were more late model vehicles in IP, then there would be more support for changing the regs. However, without changes to the regs, where is the incentive to get started???)

This Tas series sounds brilliant!!!

Edited by clayoth
  • 2 weeks later...
Absolutely brilliant!!

This should be in VIC. I would be there with bells on.

Well we usually get a few Victorians come down for each round including Mark Connolly - Porsche 968 RS Turbo and Daniel Shultz - Mitsubishi Evolution 6 TME.

Jump on the Spirt fo Tas Saturday night, race all day Sunday and shoot back overnight ready for work Monday morning.

Edited by t01-100

From what I have read on this thread is that in Tasmania you run a class of racing which is friendly to Imported cars , turbo, 4wd. There are no restrictions and it's quite cheap regarding entry into the event.

I have talked to a few people about organising something along these lines for NSW. But it was only a topic that has been raised a few times with the result being no more than 'yeah yeah great idea'.

I would like to know who is seriously interested in putting together a class of racing to suit the market in NSW. I don't think the idea of completely unrestricted will work for everyone, but you can run a class based on sport sedans, followed by another on production sports cars.

Instead of restrictors you run boost control (BOV's re: indy cars)based on drivetrain and weight.

As an example

4WD/1300kg/1.1bar/9" wheels

2WD/1150/1.4bar/9",11"wheels

One place it would work is a support event to drifting along with Super sprint rounds. Infact super sprint events would be a great place to start. There is the option of running teams in the Alfa Club 6 hour relay (eastern creek, november 2006).The AMRS series may entertain the idea also.

Whoever is interested in entertaining this 'idea' put your thoughts on the thread or PM me.

cheers

Steve

Steve there are already 2 classes running in the NSW state champs that accept imports like gtrs - production and improved production. You could also run them in sports sedans but that is 2wd only.

Why not run in one of those? there are existing series, competitors, rules and race meets :P and a heap of skylines competing, there are at least 4 production and 2 improved production r32 gtrs

Steve there are already 2 classes running in the NSW state champs that accept imports like gtrs - production and improved production. You could also run them in sports sedans but that is 2wd only.

Why not run in one of those? there are existing series, competitors, rules and race meets :happy: and a heap of skylines competing, there are at least 4 production and 2 improved production r32 gtrs

I am aware of these classes and being a avid spectator of motorsport, having watched the racing many times and have infact been for a few flying laps in a Yellow GTR. Funny, I'm sure his name was Duncan also :bomb_ie: at Wakefield which I will not forget in a hurry. Thanks again Duncan.

I would like to see a class of racing which is more friendly and unrestrictive to turbo and 4wd cars. The way they run these classes which do nothing to help bolster the fields and bring in these particular cars. The guys in Tasmania look to have filled it, so why not do something the similar up here.

Personally I own a R33 GTST that I want to race but cannot. I'm sure there are many others in the same boat with 32's and 34's who want to compete, but with nothing really available to them. The thought of a class suited to Nissan Skylines and/or other low volume imports could open the door for prospective racers to come and have a go. Something like the Porsche cup guys do.

I know it can be done, its a point of doing something about it if people really want it to happen.

Cheers

In NSW and Vic the Late Model turbo guys have enough trackdays, super sprints, drifting, drags etc to compete at, so they don't care. In Tas and WA they have created their own classes. WA was supposed to be finished last year but they lobbied and got their "Street Car" class continued.

Street cars has been given a 10yr extension, for now anyway, the IP people are unhappy, but stiff, theres a lot more street cars than there is IP cars, mine included..

the one really big issue i have with street cars in WA is that they banned 4wd's, and forced them to run under IP rules, this came about after someone spent a wad of money on an evo, and fairly creamed everyone, winning the championship that yr, because the class is running under the sports car rules, all be it a bastardised version of them, they just took the no 4wd's your have to run under IP route and went back to having turbo rotaties up the front..

means that a pile of r's, rex's and evo's who where serious street punters and circut boys, who where considering racingly, suddenly had to slap a restrictor on and slow it down, so they just said stuff it, slightly detramental to the class as i know of several guys who wanted to compete but went elsewhere..

that said, looks like ill be sticking my 33 on the boat to tassie a couple times a year to go play in this class, looks like a barell load of fun, anyone got some rules they can link me too?

cheers

  • 2 weeks later...
Street cars has been given a 10yr extension, for now anyway, the IP people are unhappy, but stiff, theres a lot more street cars than there is IP cars, mine included..

the one really big issue i have with street cars in WA is that they banned 4wd's, and forced them to run under IP rules, this came about after someone spent a wad of money on an evo, and fairly creamed everyone, winning the championship that yr, because the class is running under the sports car rules, all be it a bastardised version of them, they just took the no 4wd's your have to run under IP route and went back to having turbo rotaties up the front..

means that a pile of r's, rex's and evo's who where serious street punters and circut boys, who where considering racingly, suddenly had to slap a restrictor on and slow it down, so they just said stuff it, slightly detramental to the class as i know of several guys who wanted to compete but went elsewhere..

that said, looks like ill be sticking my 33 on the boat to tassie a couple times a year to go play in this class, looks like a barell load of fun, anyone got some rules they can link me too?

cheers

Have a look at www.trdc.net.au

Mark Connolley from Melbourne leaves his Porsche down here now instead of taking it home.

The racing is competitive, but pretty clean.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...