Jump to content
SAU Community

Oil Control In Rb's For Circuit Drag Or Drift


Recommended Posts

this thread has turned into how to make your rb survive at the track without a dry sump

not dry sump talk

Quite right. I and a number of others have found that with the right combination of restrictors, sump breathers and a properly designed catch can system the problems can be overcome. My catch can vents to the turbo intake so is a completely sealed system. If there had been oil laden fumes going into the turbo I would have added another air/oil separator into that line but there was no evidence of that being necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ASR do have extended sumps MrFIjiGold had a word with them and initially they wanted to use my car to design it however. Unfortunate happened and it's no more. I recommend you give them a call the big problem with out GTTs is that they have to design around the sway bar

He no longer has GTT :ph34r:

And the big problem with my GTT is i still have no oil pressure under braking hard with ASR sump...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps better to describe it as "as sealed as an OEM system".

Have you guys ever had that setup kill a turbo when to much oil gets blown into tge turbo. ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you guys ever had that setup kill a turbo when to much oil gets blown into tge turbo. ??

I once had that issue in the early days, it didnt kill the turbos.

But it did end up smoking under boost like it had a blown turbo.

Ended up being oil had pooled in the intercooler piping just before the intercooler, cleaned it all out, was back to normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you guys ever had that setup kill a turbo when to much oil gets blown into tge turbo. ??

If you get oil mist going in it will probably be fine. If the oil-air separation stages fail to do a good job and you get large drops hitting the comp wheel, it could possibly do some damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the same thing happened to me years back. SAME thing really left me worried that if enough oil hit that wheel at high speeds it could destroy the turbo. Thats why I asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fatz you lazy bastard put some restrictors in, that's a big part of the problem right there. Oil does no good for your engine when it's all floating around at the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fatz you lazy bastard put some restrictors in, that's a big part of the problem right there. Oil does no good for your engine when it's all floating around at the top.

Lol. I would have though he would have done that with that setup looking so good. I would agree. Spend some time pickung the right size according to your pump options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol you guys talking about pulling heads off and doing all this fancy shit

Meanwhile I am out thrashing the car at the track thus my over the yop catch can setup with scavenge

My setup also factors in when you engine starts to wear out it gives you options to prolong the engines thrashing life( now that the engine is blowing buy abit more I can activate the scavenge )

If I rebuilt the engine I would stick one in but f**ked if I am pulling apart a runner..... Once you let the Nissan out they are never the same

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fatz has the idea. Drive it and deal with it rather than pulling the engine out and sitting at a keyboard arguing over the Internet with people that your engine will have zero oil issues and you will do it this way and they should to, and then you realise you haven't driven your car for over a year and won't for another few months when the person with the issue is out wringing their cars neck every few weeks.

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps. I suspect that anyone who is serious enough to care about this stuff (enough to do something about it, that is) and is permitted to spend/waste money on their car by the domestic authority (wife) shouldn't be so short of cash that they wouldn't just buy and build another engine out of the car while driving the original.

I do a lot of car things the cheap way (or not do anything at all!) because between myself and my wife we know that it is just a waste of money, even taking into consideration the philosophy that anything you enjoyed wasting was not actually wasted. But if I decided that I just couldn't put up with the 9 or 10 things about my car that are currently bothering me, I'd just go spend the $10 or $15k that would be needed to right it all (properly). I think the engine building stuff really ought to be done the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you guys ever had that setup kill a turbo when to much oil gets blown into tge turbo. ??

No. As I said if I thought there was a likelihood of that happening (e.g. traces of oil in the line to the turbo inlet) I would have put an air/oil separator in the line. My catch can seems to do what its intended to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...