Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am pretty sure that 25 neo's can only do 195-205rwkw max from stock turbo.

Thats 261.50-274.90rwhp.

how is an older less powerfull rb25 going to put out more power with fewer mods?

it isnt, stop talking shit.

or point me in the direction of threads of people posting dyno sheets to show otherwise.

well to prove that my one is truthful here is the dyno sheet!!! 302rwhp!!!

post-13479-1143205919.jpg

Edited by Wildcat
  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

here's a standard turbo running 7psi , standard spec rebuilt motor with a HKS 264 deg exhaust cam set at '0' deg. It has a S-afc and factory ecu, large bosch fuel pump (from when the motor ran nitrous). Runs a turbo back exhaust and factory intercooler.

The rich mixtures are due to the fact that I was selling it to someone and I wanted it to be reliable from the get go. He was also not yet used to the power so the very mild tune was to keep him alive long enough to allow him to re-tune.

The change to the exhaust cam took away the 'bump' even without the ecu upgrade.

This car wherever it is could easily be tuned to run walk in the park high 12's even without a decent launch.

Another example of how good the factory turbo is can be found in 2rismo's car, even without my old nitrous kit he was able to run into the 12's. With the kit switched on he runs 11's.

post-271-1143258737.jpg

Pulp i dont know how it pulled that much

1st run Mods 3, mandral bent exhaust from turbo back and hfc

cypher pod fillter

Psi in wangara first run 242rwhp 10 psi

they spun out there was another customer there and he said i was pulling more than his r33 and he had piggy back ecu and frontmount + my mods and it was manual

2nd xspeed after front mount and eboost 240rwhp at 8psi and then 250 and 10psi

i told them about psi effort and they said psis dyno would have been stuffed then my baby busted out the 250rwhp

the turbo looks stock and i have not touched the it but i was told it MUST have been hiflowed to pull that power

i have all ways kept it serviced by the same mechanic

james

Edited by Miller the hoon

That dyno printout that Wildcat posted is of my car..... And as far as we are aware its still got the stock ECU, with just the piggy backed AVC-R to control the boost and a SAFC-II to control air/fuel mixtures... the timing and air/fuel was played around with and at some times the curve did smooth out a bit but it cost HP up the top end.... The curve might not look as smooth as the other one you posted but I dont find it a problem at all when driving....

its one thing to be able to make the power its another not to have too much knock and blow shit up in the car.. my r34 gtt made 297rwhp but had to be put a lil down to 268hp cuz my engin was knockin way too much and i have a very hevy foot.plus i would hait not to have a reliable car.. but gettin 319 outa a stock r33 sounds very sus as i have got a 3.5inch exohst all the way, fule regulator, pfc, ebc, pot filter,fmic and a few more mods to be able to make that power but i still need engin internals to be able to take push it a lil more.. i cant picture how a gtst r33 can make more than an r34 with less mods!! and the r34s have Veriable Valve timeing too wich should add some edge.. i agree with noise. newer car means better engin although the ciramic turbo in the r34s limts us to max of 15psi our engins start knockin alot at about 13psi with 98octane fule that is how ever the car u guys were talkin about doesnt have a pfc do u probebly dont know howmuch knockin u gettin unless ur usein a dig tool for it..

s2 33 has vvt also, not sure if s1 do.

friends ex r33 made well over 350 rwhp on stock internals, and for more then a week. 320 is a walk in the park.

13psi causes me motor to knock does it? is that 13 psi with a stock turbo? a gt30r? t88? because they all flow the equal same amount of air at 13psi....

a stock 34 turbo is out of puff before a 33 one. dont forget that.

dude if your engines start knocking at only 13 psi something is very wrong hey and as long as they're tuned right, the stock rb's can make very decent hp on standard internals

if i had those mods and i had knocking at 13psi i'd fire my tuner asap

' date='24 Mar 2006, 10:49 AM' post='2044831']

No way in hell its making that sort of power with totally stock bits

cams, headwork ?

maybe more capacity ?

what sort of correction on the dyno?

is the dyno currently dyno dynamics accredited?

No Cams or headwork that we know of. Definitly standard capacity as NIB said the car looks like it has never been touched.

Has been running with the stated mods for more than 2years now at the same boost level and never had any engine troubles so reliable??? HELL YEAH... I guess we can all just say that this car is just a freak or posible hi flow turbo?? We wont know until we pull it apart I guess...

' date='26 Mar 2006, 07:41 PM' post='2048856']

2rismo uses nos to make his power :thumbsup: CHEATER! :D

What time has this 33 set with 320 (sAfrican American) rwhp

thats got to be mid 12 with good mph....

runs 12's without nitrous tho' on the stocker turbo.......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...