Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

actually ur wrong, i can c the constuction for the albury bypass which started 8 months ago

also the epping bypass is in there also :wub:

I can see houses in estates around me that are being built around the year old mark

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

some places dont work cause they havnt been mappd yet, id be more worried about there being satalites in space that can zoom in on your nipples

they have been there since the 70's dude.. the latest CIA KH-11 keyhole satellites have crazy resolutions.. and the NSA signals intelligence satellites capture all sorts of radio transmissions :D

Read this - http://www.space.com/SpaceReportersNetwork...ats_022202.html

ech1.jpg

:(

Google Earth rocks...... We use it to spy good fishing spots creeks you can't ever seem to find when walking

through mangroves n stuff.

But as far as its updated i reckon its about year behind in the N.T which is odd because i mean we have so

much to see n all.... Funny how the creeks i want to fish are generally covered with clouds when i look for them i reckon my wife works for them and covers the spots i talk about.

Can you even look at your house? Last time i looked it was all blurred from around your place down to around Albert Park. My place and work were in the blurred section.

Yep. You can even see into the pool.

Picture-7.jpg

para u mean the Burj Al Arab?

BURJ-AL-ARAB.jpg

its really a long way away from the airport so they should have built it closer to town. maybe its closer to snobsville (if there is such a thing over there)

best it could do was this:

post-227-1143558460.jpg

para u mean the Burj Al Arab?

its really a long way away from the airport so they should have built it closer to town. maybe its closer to snobsville (if there is such a thing over there)

best it could do was this:

Pretty sure that's the hotel with its own private highway staright from the airport. Isn't that where it got its 7 star rating from?

Adrian

the 7 star isnt acutally an offical rating... its just a marketing gimic. Not to take anything away from the hotel which is definately one of the best in the world. But the rating system isnt exactly a standardised one.

para u mean the Burj Al Arab?

BURJ-AL-ARAB.jpg

its really a long way away from the airport so they should have built it closer to town. maybe its closer to snobsville (if there is such a thing over there)

best it could do was this:

Ive got a video of Andre Agissi playing tennis in the court in the sky and launches balls off of it

I would be thinking meteorite shower if i were on the beach :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...