Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 GTS-T Rear Speakers?


Gianni
 Share

Recommended Posts

Front is standard 6 1/2" but will take 6" .. rears are 6".. make sure they're fairly low profile so as to not come down too much onto the HICAS module in the boot, etc.

edit: i could be wrong on the rears, might need to check. Maybe they're same as the fronts and will take either

anyway, here is all the old stuff with info on how to take out parcel shelves, etc:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/archive/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

if you dont want to do anything major then just mount 6 1/2 inched in the old slots and use the factor grills that are on the parcel shelf to cover them. otherwise you could do what i did an put pioneer 6x9s and custom made a parcel shelf for the back dash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

would low profile speakers means they will have inferior bass response? Since the better ones usually have larger magnets and thus may intrude to the hicas system behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest wontok

Somethin to consider, I put all my cash into the front stage and got rid of the rears all together. Sounds awesome, but it's all up to personal taste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah

i got a pair of mb quart splits, cost a mint but i got them on special. their awesome, but they were too big for the stock holes to i had to custom make them into the doors. also made a hold in the doors for the tweeter. looks like it came like that from the factory, im quite happy with them.

they are loud as hell but i didnt buy them for bass, ive got 2 12" kicker comps in my garage, jsut need a box and amp.

im only running front speakers atm just like u wontok.

going to get some 3ways for the rear, and run them jsut of the headunit.

may i sugest taking in the black speaker holder thats behind the door and test fitting your speakers or else u will spend 4hrs+ making custom door mounts ect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

fronts are a 6.5"

rears are a 6.5"

philips 3 ways are a bolt in idea as are the larger pioneer items. the 6" ones require a steel/ wooden plate to fit properly.

clarion 6" will also fit and come with teh adapting plate for nissan cars ( the originals are clarion.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so which 6" would u guys recommend .. for front stage and then maybe the back ... i'm looking for some mb quart for my front ... at the back i dont know ... i dont' want to leave it empty .. i want something cheap but not too sh1t ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey guys, its 11:30pm, and i am trying to take out the darn 6 inches from the rear parcel shelf, but there is a nuisance 'baby anchor plate' across my 6's, because i going to replace with explods 6X9's, but the question is HOW DO I TAKE OFF THE TOP (BROWN WOODEN + CARPET TOP LAYER PARCLE SHELF) OFF???, so i can get to the bolts which removes the baby anchors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...