Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all.

i have an 89 model r32 gts-t. im after a turbo upgrade, but i dont know what to buy. i can afford a total of roughly $2000 (tax return, yay!) for parts (manifold, turbo, gaskets etc.).

ive resaerched this topic on the forums but couldnt find a conclusive desision. although i think that Garret turbos seem to be popular and of quality. but correct me if im worng.

im after a SOLID 200 or more rwkw (the more the merrier) with minimal lag.

ive been told that if your gunna get a turbo upgrade you need to upgrade you BOV? is this true?

what has everyone else done?.. other mods that will be done at the same time are

300*600*76 fmic

2.5 inch exhaust

e-manage piggy back computer

greddy rs bov (if nesasary)

steel head gasket

yeah.

cheers all.

and pretty please dont lecture me about "doing a search"cos i did a detailed search with no luck. sorry if i missed somthing. :)

thanks heaps in advance.

James.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113939-r32-turbo-upgrade/
Share on other sites

the advantage is cost, you can sell the emagange and its not needed and get a remap instead. the remap will be better and youll have less junk in the wiring loom, less stuff to go wrong or fail or cause other issues

im after a SOLID 200 or more rwkw (the more the merrier) with minimal lag.

ON an RB20... you cant have that.

Go with the HKS 2530 IMO.

Throw the Emanage in the bin and use a re-map as stated

get a full 3" exhaust

all this is going to cost more than $2000 though dude, nothing is ever cheap like that

lol... The GT3540R won't make boost until 6500rpm. :P

That turbo is way way too big.

If you want new I'd probably look at the GT2871 48trim Comp & paired to the .64 turbine housing.

http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/prod414.htm

Push 18psi or so though it.. Should be a nice streetable turbo on the rb20. :P

cheers for the input all. i spoke to someone who sells garret turbo's and they recomended a gt3540R.

whats everyone else's opinion on that?

ta. James.

Your kidding right? :P

Two pointers for you in relation to that

1) Tell that person they are a retard.

2) Dont ever talk to them again

Take the advice in this thread. Horsepowerinabox item looks quite nice aswell. Very well suited with the .64

im with ash + others

why have you asked for help and then chosen to cleary ignore it?

i think you need to get a few things straight

what do u want out of the car?

quick street? quick drag?

do you want to just make max power or average power?

how much money do you have?

I've had a good look at the compressor maps.

If you want to start pushing more than 19-20psi through the 48trim 71mm Comp wheel consider stepping up to the slightly laggier 52trim that will be fine for up to around 24psi and a few more horses.

I personally would stay away from the 56trim comp wheel.

But if you can pick up a good s/h hksgt2530 thats obviously a tried and proven responsive turbo. For a little more power on pump fuel the gt2871 48 - 52trim is worth while. :P

firstly: paul, i was not ignoring yours and others advice. please dont take it like that, i was simply exploring other options.

secondly: a daily driver that ill be taking to drag events.

all in all i intend to spend 3 grand on the turbo (tops, like if i had to pay for manifold. gaskets. ditting kit or whatever.)

thirdly: i apologise if my ignorance is frustrating yall more experienced people.

cheers. james

With your budget:

3inch turbo back exhaust, get a knock off front pipe, new 3inch cat and second hand jap 3" cat back ~850-900 installed, or consider a full x force system for about the same money.

Intercooler and piping kit off Nissan Silvia sponsors for about 450, install yourself. If you can do your own pipework you will save some money there.

Second hand r33 turbo, install yourself 350-400 plus $50 for gaskets.

Leaves you with about 200.

Buy an adjustable actuator with it.

The car will run reasonably well assuming your fuel pump is ok, if not another 200 to replace it.

Find another 3-400 and have a chat with dr drift about a remap of the stock ecu.

Forget about the emange, forget about the head gasket, forget about the garrett turbos, forget about the bov. you cant afford them with your budget.

This is based on your initial 2k budget. It'll cosy about 2.5k though.

With the 3k you could look at s/h highflow turbos

Edited by BHDave

You sure about that GT2871R turbo selection cubes? They're not exactly super responsive responsive on the SR20 so I would imagine the RB20 would be a bit worse. Maybe the 71mm 48 trim might be alright but... its definitely less responsive than having a 60mm compressor.

I would say GT28RS if you couldnt get your hands on a GT2530! But you'll need a T3-T28 flange adapter IIRC.

alright then. so its decided.

A GT2871R with .64 housing anf 48 trim.

thanks guys youve been really helpful. :rofl:

but what will need to be done (besides bigger cooler and exhaust) to fit it? ie: what parts will i need to buy with it? does it have a T3 flange thingo?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...