Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good day all

I was just wondering if anyone has GT 30/40 on their GTR? How much power do you make as i check the stickie thread for performance upgrades on GTR but no one seem to have them.

I was thinking if i have GT 30/40

Manifold

Ex-gate

Run around 18-20psi

Would i make around 300kw@rear?

Do i need new pump and injectors as car currently make 250kw@rear with stock turbos on 14psi.

Goal is to achive only 300@rear.

I don't want to go N1 or 2530's even though i know they make good power but i just want to be different. I've seen a 32gtr with N1's ran mid 11 on street tyres.

It seem to me that steel wheels turbo is a cheap insurance for the gtrs.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/118635-anyone-has-gt-3040-on-their-gtr/
Share on other sites

im running a std internal RB25 with cams etc etc getting 294rwkw on 18 psi ... they will make 300 and more on an rb26

std injectors etc should be fine, upgrade the fuel pump for piece of mind

edit : hahha whoops

thats on HKS 3040 0.70 AR with 1.12 rear housing ..

Edited by Craved
im running a std internal RB25 with cams etc etc getting 294rwkw on 18 psi ... they will make 300 and more on an rb26

std injectors etc should be fine, upgrade the fuel pump for piece of mind

edit hahha whoops

thats on HKS 3040 0.70 AR with 1.12 rear housing ..

Nice, is there much different between HKS and Garret? I'm pretty sure i can order the same triming from Garret as i believe HKS GT 30/40 has been around for a while now, copy right is no longer apply to it.

What size waste gate are you running? High mount manifold? Apperantly the cheap CHINA made one these days are fine, not like when they first come out.

I'm making 250kw and maximum reading on my injectors duty cycle is around 80-82% so hopefully with another 50kw stockies should be fine. Yeah probably after market fuel pump should be done as well.

Last one mate, is it LAGGY? At how much RPM is full boost?

Thanks

As stated by West I would go bigger.

The HKS Drag car runs 2 35/40's(I know they have a little bit more money than us lol).

I would go either the 35/40 or a 40r.

If you go the smaller one if you decide to go a little harder later you will have to get a bigger turbo.

I'm running a 35/40 on a 25/30 Combo but it hasnt been run in yet and hard tuned so it is really docile at the moment so I cant comment on the power advantage.

Anyway my 2 c do with it as you will.........

GO BIGGER :)

Cheers

Imtorqing

Seriously no one has a 30/40 on their gtr? Is it because its too small :).

Im running a 3040r garrett on my 26, with a .82 rear housing, jun 264 deg cams with 9.2mm lift, china hi mount manifold, 50mm greddy gate, no adjustment of cams gears, no timing in the tune, boost was coming on high in the 2k range, like 2800-2900 and on song around 33-3400..

a 3040 is still good for 600hp, so its hardly a small turbo, and if like myself your chasing response, a better way to go, i was considering a 3540, but after chatting to sydneykid about it, he felt the 3040 would be better to achieve my goal of boost by 3k

Im running a 3040r garrett on my 26, with a .82 rear housing, jun 264 deg cams with 9.2mm lift, china hi mount manifold, 50mm greddy gate, no adjustment of cams gears, no timing in the tune, boost was coming on high in the 2k range, like 2800-2900 and on song around 33-3400..

a 3040 is still good for 600hp, so its hardly a small turbo, and if like myself your chasing response, a better way to go, i was considering a 3540, but after chatting to sydneykid about it, he felt the 3040 would be better to achieve my goal of boost by 3k

What sort of power did this make, at what boost?

What sort of power did this make, at what boost?

300ish at ten pound, with a limit set at 6k, as the thing was running out of fuel, was tuned safe as it was entered int he dutton rally and i hadn't had time to complete the propper fuel system for it, im about to get stuck back into it shortly, so ill post up the power and a graph when its done properly, im only aiming for 4-450 needies and that will be ample to bake the rears for drifting, which is what the ca ris mainly intended for with some circut racing and stuff like dutton rallies thrown in for fun

Acording to everyone feed back, this turbo seem to be not as laggy as i expected.

On a healthy engine, will i see 300 to 320kw@wheel?

yes you'll see that power

laggy depends on the housing you have..

mine is getting full boost @ around 5000rpm with a 1.12 rear housing.. i have just picked up an 0.87 housing, yet to put it on and see ..

so can be laggy, depending on what other things you use with it .. tune (timing advance off boost etc), boost controller, waste gate spring setting etc etc etc .

could only expect better response on an rb26 .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...