Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday,

I recently took my car to the tyre shop to get some new tyres fitted and the guys freaked when they saw the spacers on the front wheel.

"YOU GO TO THE TRACK AND YOU HAVE SPACERS?!?! FUARRK"

They're the type that screw into the hub and they have their own studs the wheel goes on. The wheels I have don't seem to have the guide the goes onto/around the hub so the studs do all the work. I always thought that was normal.

Is this dangerous? Should I be taking the spacers off on the track and putting a full set of wheels with no spacers on?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119216-spacers-and-track-days/
Share on other sites

i dunno, i've thought about it a bit too. i mean generally the little hub ring is what carries all the load, the studs just pull the wheel onto it. so if it's not sitting on that lip the it may not be centrally located (though the tapered wheel nuts should ensure it is pretty much there). plus like you say all the load is on the studs. I have acutally heard of a guy who had wheels on with no hubcentric ring and on the track (phillip island) his studs broke and the wheel came flying off. so i guess it is a risk.

Shit Richard sounds bad.

I heard of this hub ring thing in another thread but regardless of my spacers my wheels don't have this. Is this bad? They're manarays so they're not total rubbish.

I can't remember if the spacers have a hub ring.

So.. I should be getting new wheels or what?

yeah, there is some debate over this,

they are not legal in victoria.. however they are commonly used, and I haven't heard of any bad experiences with them, i mean as long as all the nuts are tight, it shouldn't be any different to having lower offset wheels on? I guess the centering could be an issue but i really don't know.

Definitely a concern. My spacers o the track car fit tight onto the hub ring so centering and shear loads are carried by the hub, then there is a further ring for the wheel and a different PCD of studs in the spacer.

Hunt around to see if you can get locating rings to fill the space or even get them machined to suit at an engineering shop. Certainly worth the peace of mind. I've seen plenty of studs brocken and a lot were with cheap spacers you get from Superautocheapbarn.

Definitely a concern. My spacers o the track car fit tight onto the hub ring so centering and shear loads are carried by the hub, then there is a further ring for the wheel and a different PCD of studs in the spacer.

Hunt around to see if you can get locating rings to fill the space or even get them machined to suit at an engineering shop. Certainly worth the peace of mind. I've seen plenty of studs brocken and a lot were with cheap spacers you get from Superautocheapbarn.

D'oh. Yet another thing to do ;)

Thanks for the replies guys. I'll double check my spacers I hope they're ok.

I don't understand how the wheels would be made without the centering ring however. Maybe I've just missed it but everytime I put the wheel on I use one of the studs as a guide. When I look through the wheels where they attached to the hub it's just the 2 surfaces put together - so if you don't do up the nuts for example, the wheel will just flay, not sit tight on the hub ring. This is even true for the rear wheels which have no spacers.

:(

CC: have a nother look at them. when they are on the car they just look flat up against the hub, that's because the ring goes inside a recess in the wheel. sometimes this recess is too big in which case you will need to fit a hubcentric ring to make it the correct size. aluminium ones are good, but some people like plastic ones. the wheel wont sit on it without the nuts done up (it will just flay like you say), that is why you need the nuts and studs to force it onto the hub ring. it definately is important.

there is nothing wrong with bolt on spacers really providing they fit on the hub ring, and have another ring on their face to locate your wheel and take the force.

well here's some info on google:

Hub centric rings are manufactured so that when they are installed on a vehicle, the wheels are located directly off of the centre flange of the brake drum or rotor. This is done to insure that the outer beads of the wheel are concentric with the wheel bearings. The result is a much truer, better balanced tire/wheel assembly. This is very important with modern high tech suspension systems.

that explains the rings i was talking about. they have an OD to fit snugly into your rim and an ID that allows them to fit snugly over the OD of the centre of the hub.

edit: they look like so:

hubrings_large.jpg

see the ring in the centre of the hub, this is what your wheel (or spacer) needs to fit snugly onto:

WheelHubSmall.jpg

without this contact you 'can' get broken studs premeturely worn wheel bearings (which you can get running spacers and/or very wide wheels) and at worst a runaway wheel...

i don't have spacers, but the work rims i got had a central hole bigger than the hub (ie didn't centre correctly on the hub).

was a little concerned that this would be putting unnecessary stress on the studs, so bought a set of those plastic rims for a wheel & tyre place for $20.

they basically just centre the rim on the hub correctly.

the best ones to get are the aluminium ones (like this pic) but i'm sure the plastic ones are ok too. in fact i think now some people argue the plastic ones can be better depending on brand.

hubcentric-rings-alluminum.image.jpg

see the ring in the centre of the hub, this is what your wheel (or spacer) needs to fit snugly onto:

WheelHubSmall.jpg

without this contact you 'can' get broken studs premeturely worn wheel bearings (which you can get running spacers and/or very wide wheels) and at worst a runaway wheel...

Yep ok.

Thats what I was thinking :D

As I already have spacers... Is it posible to get something to go in to the wheel its self, that is longer than the spacer? I mean my mechanic isnt overly concerned, but Im just thinking R tyres at 160kmh or so, thats a fair bit of stress.

Hub rings aside, for spacers the bolt on ones are fine, they are just like a hub with a different offset and are not problem. But...the ones that slip over the wheel nuts (by far the most common) are not safe, the wheel nut does not have as much stud to screw onto and the stud itself is not properly supported (leverage at the end not right against the hub)

Hub rings aside, for spacers the bolt on ones are fine, they are just like a hub with a different offset and are not problem. But...the ones that slip over the wheel nuts (by far the most common) are not safe, the wheel nut does not have as much stud to screw onto and the stud itself is not properly supported (leverage at the end not right against the hub)

Yes... thats what I have. I got longer studs so the nut actually grips on to something. But I dont think thats a good fix.

I don't understand how the wheels would be made without the centering ring however.
It's not a problem of the wheel not having a centring ring (it does), it's that the spacers are lacking the matching half of the design.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
    • Which solenoid? Why was it changed? Again, why was this done? ...well, these wear..but ultimately, why was it changed? Did you reset the idle voltage level after fitment? I'm just a tad confused ~ the flash code doesn't allude to these items being faulty, so in my mind the only reason to change these things, would be some drive-ability issue....and if that's the case, what was the problem? Those questions aside, check if the dropping resistor is OK ...should be 11~14 ohms (TCU doesn't throw a flash code for this) ~ also, these TCU designs have full time power (to keep fault code RAM alive), and I think that'll throw a logic code (as opposed to the 10 hardware codes), if that power is missing (or the ram has gone bad in the TCU, which you can check..but that's another story here perhaps).
    • Question for people who "know stuff" I am looking at doing the new intake like the one in the picture (the pictured is designed for the OEM TB and intake plenum), this design has the filter behind the front bar, but, the filter sits where the OEM duct heads into the front bar, and the standard aperture when the OEM ducting is removed allows the filter to pulled back out of the front bar into the engine bay for servicing, a simple blanking plate is used to seal the aperture behind the filter This will require a 45° silicone hose from the TB, like the alloy pipe that is currently there, to another 45° silicone hose to get a straight run to the aperture in the front bar Question: how will it effect the tune if I move the MAF about 100-150mm forward, the red is around where my MAF is currently, and the green would be where it would end up Like this This is the hole the filter goes through  Ends up like this LOL..Cheers    
    • Despite the level up question, actually I do know what that is....it is a pressure sender wire.  So check out around the oil filter for an oil pressure sender, or maybe fuel pressure near the filter or on the engine. Possibly but less likely coolant pressure sensor because they tend to be combined temp/pressure senders if you have one. Could also be brake pressure (in a brake line somewhere pre ABS) but maybe I'm the only one that has that on a skyline.
    • Pull codes via the self-diagnosis procedure. As far as I can tell this is just a sign of transmission issues but not a code unto itself.
×
×
  • Create New...