Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday,

I recently took my car to the tyre shop to get some new tyres fitted and the guys freaked when they saw the spacers on the front wheel.

"YOU GO TO THE TRACK AND YOU HAVE SPACERS?!?! FUARRK"

They're the type that screw into the hub and they have their own studs the wheel goes on. The wheels I have don't seem to have the guide the goes onto/around the hub so the studs do all the work. I always thought that was normal.

Is this dangerous? Should I be taking the spacers off on the track and putting a full set of wheels with no spacers on?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/119216-spacers-and-track-days/
Share on other sites

i dunno, i've thought about it a bit too. i mean generally the little hub ring is what carries all the load, the studs just pull the wheel onto it. so if it's not sitting on that lip the it may not be centrally located (though the tapered wheel nuts should ensure it is pretty much there). plus like you say all the load is on the studs. I have acutally heard of a guy who had wheels on with no hubcentric ring and on the track (phillip island) his studs broke and the wheel came flying off. so i guess it is a risk.

Shit Richard sounds bad.

I heard of this hub ring thing in another thread but regardless of my spacers my wheels don't have this. Is this bad? They're manarays so they're not total rubbish.

I can't remember if the spacers have a hub ring.

So.. I should be getting new wheels or what?

yeah, there is some debate over this,

they are not legal in victoria.. however they are commonly used, and I haven't heard of any bad experiences with them, i mean as long as all the nuts are tight, it shouldn't be any different to having lower offset wheels on? I guess the centering could be an issue but i really don't know.

Definitely a concern. My spacers o the track car fit tight onto the hub ring so centering and shear loads are carried by the hub, then there is a further ring for the wheel and a different PCD of studs in the spacer.

Hunt around to see if you can get locating rings to fill the space or even get them machined to suit at an engineering shop. Certainly worth the peace of mind. I've seen plenty of studs brocken and a lot were with cheap spacers you get from Superautocheapbarn.

Definitely a concern. My spacers o the track car fit tight onto the hub ring so centering and shear loads are carried by the hub, then there is a further ring for the wheel and a different PCD of studs in the spacer.

Hunt around to see if you can get locating rings to fill the space or even get them machined to suit at an engineering shop. Certainly worth the peace of mind. I've seen plenty of studs brocken and a lot were with cheap spacers you get from Superautocheapbarn.

D'oh. Yet another thing to do ;)

Thanks for the replies guys. I'll double check my spacers I hope they're ok.

I don't understand how the wheels would be made without the centering ring however. Maybe I've just missed it but everytime I put the wheel on I use one of the studs as a guide. When I look through the wheels where they attached to the hub it's just the 2 surfaces put together - so if you don't do up the nuts for example, the wheel will just flay, not sit tight on the hub ring. This is even true for the rear wheels which have no spacers.

:(

CC: have a nother look at them. when they are on the car they just look flat up against the hub, that's because the ring goes inside a recess in the wheel. sometimes this recess is too big in which case you will need to fit a hubcentric ring to make it the correct size. aluminium ones are good, but some people like plastic ones. the wheel wont sit on it without the nuts done up (it will just flay like you say), that is why you need the nuts and studs to force it onto the hub ring. it definately is important.

there is nothing wrong with bolt on spacers really providing they fit on the hub ring, and have another ring on their face to locate your wheel and take the force.

well here's some info on google:

Hub centric rings are manufactured so that when they are installed on a vehicle, the wheels are located directly off of the centre flange of the brake drum or rotor. This is done to insure that the outer beads of the wheel are concentric with the wheel bearings. The result is a much truer, better balanced tire/wheel assembly. This is very important with modern high tech suspension systems.

that explains the rings i was talking about. they have an OD to fit snugly into your rim and an ID that allows them to fit snugly over the OD of the centre of the hub.

edit: they look like so:

hubrings_large.jpg

see the ring in the centre of the hub, this is what your wheel (or spacer) needs to fit snugly onto:

WheelHubSmall.jpg

without this contact you 'can' get broken studs premeturely worn wheel bearings (which you can get running spacers and/or very wide wheels) and at worst a runaway wheel...

i don't have spacers, but the work rims i got had a central hole bigger than the hub (ie didn't centre correctly on the hub).

was a little concerned that this would be putting unnecessary stress on the studs, so bought a set of those plastic rims for a wheel & tyre place for $20.

they basically just centre the rim on the hub correctly.

the best ones to get are the aluminium ones (like this pic) but i'm sure the plastic ones are ok too. in fact i think now some people argue the plastic ones can be better depending on brand.

hubcentric-rings-alluminum.image.jpg

see the ring in the centre of the hub, this is what your wheel (or spacer) needs to fit snugly onto:

WheelHubSmall.jpg

without this contact you 'can' get broken studs premeturely worn wheel bearings (which you can get running spacers and/or very wide wheels) and at worst a runaway wheel...

Yep ok.

Thats what I was thinking :D

As I already have spacers... Is it posible to get something to go in to the wheel its self, that is longer than the spacer? I mean my mechanic isnt overly concerned, but Im just thinking R tyres at 160kmh or so, thats a fair bit of stress.

Hub rings aside, for spacers the bolt on ones are fine, they are just like a hub with a different offset and are not problem. But...the ones that slip over the wheel nuts (by far the most common) are not safe, the wheel nut does not have as much stud to screw onto and the stud itself is not properly supported (leverage at the end not right against the hub)

Hub rings aside, for spacers the bolt on ones are fine, they are just like a hub with a different offset and are not problem. But...the ones that slip over the wheel nuts (by far the most common) are not safe, the wheel nut does not have as much stud to screw onto and the stud itself is not properly supported (leverage at the end not right against the hub)

Yes... thats what I have. I got longer studs so the nut actually grips on to something. But I dont think thats a good fix.

I don't understand how the wheels would be made without the centering ring however.
It's not a problem of the wheel not having a centring ring (it does), it's that the spacers are lacking the matching half of the design.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...