Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest IH8VEE8S

fkn kents just lost 50 bux :)

there goes my lunch money for the week.

as much as i'm not a fan of australia's soccer team i still got soooo excited when they played the way they did in the last 10 minutes.

still ZERO chance against brazil, might be a challenge to croatia but not brazil.

LMFAO how funny is that ad with the old dude bagging the aussies :O:D:D

love that kent

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

awsome game...nealy went asleap until the last 8min of goal action....how awsome was that!!

omfg do the japs dive...soft...and they paid the price...lucky to even get the bs goal in the first half...totally a pentaly...

yay!

the next match is gonna be wicked

Edited by khunjeng

Martin Tyler was right in his call about the controversial Japanese goal, it was utter BS and good on him for speaking out about it. Every call he made that night was cynical about the referee's and he had good points about their lack of experience. This is a World Cup game which makes or breaks entire teams (and countries), the best available referee's should be on field, which Tyler was stating and was 100% correct about. Australia won in the end so it makes no difference now.

GO AUSSIES!!! :):O:D

Guest IH8VEE8S
Martin Tyler was right in his call about the controversial Japanese goal, it was utter BS and good on him for speaking out about it. Every call he made that night was cynical about the referee's and he had good points about their lack of experience. This is a World Cup game which makes or breaks entire teams (and countries), the best available referee's should be on field, which Tyler was stating and was 100% correct about. Australia won in the end so it makes no difference now.

GO AUSSIES!!! :):O:D

in this game the commentater was Simon Hill not Martin Tyler, which game you talking about?

Good on the aussies for winning, and they played well in the last 10 minutes(lucky the jap's were attacking).

However i dont think they played that well, if it was against brazil or another top side they would have been down more than one goal. Their defence was sooooo open, a good team could have exploited them fully.

Where as at the other end it was always a traffic jam, and australia finally scored when the goalie came off his mark.

Good on the aussies for winning, but they must fix their defence to get anywhere

i think anyone who thinks that they woudl do well against a team like Brazil would have to be severly dellusional.

They should just enjoy their time there as much as possible... before coming back to australia to be heckled by the pathetic aussie media who hype everyone up while theyre winning and then turn on them like a pack of wolves as soon as they fail.

Bloody lost $10 to my fiances mum cause i said the Japs would win... stupid japs.

And i hear the "usual" hooligan behaviour was displayed in the Melb CBD overnight.

farking appaling.

I dont get why you have to trash/loot after a soccer game.

You never see it after an AFL/NRL grand final or anything

And people say they dont wanna be stereo typed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...