Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest IH8VEE8S

fkn kents just lost 50 bux :)

there goes my lunch money for the week.

as much as i'm not a fan of australia's soccer team i still got soooo excited when they played the way they did in the last 10 minutes.

still ZERO chance against brazil, might be a challenge to croatia but not brazil.

LMFAO how funny is that ad with the old dude bagging the aussies :O:D:D

love that kent

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

awsome game...nealy went asleap until the last 8min of goal action....how awsome was that!!

omfg do the japs dive...soft...and they paid the price...lucky to even get the bs goal in the first half...totally a pentaly...

yay!

the next match is gonna be wicked

Edited by khunjeng

Martin Tyler was right in his call about the controversial Japanese goal, it was utter BS and good on him for speaking out about it. Every call he made that night was cynical about the referee's and he had good points about their lack of experience. This is a World Cup game which makes or breaks entire teams (and countries), the best available referee's should be on field, which Tyler was stating and was 100% correct about. Australia won in the end so it makes no difference now.

GO AUSSIES!!! :):O:D

Guest IH8VEE8S
Martin Tyler was right in his call about the controversial Japanese goal, it was utter BS and good on him for speaking out about it. Every call he made that night was cynical about the referee's and he had good points about their lack of experience. This is a World Cup game which makes or breaks entire teams (and countries), the best available referee's should be on field, which Tyler was stating and was 100% correct about. Australia won in the end so it makes no difference now.

GO AUSSIES!!! :):O:D

in this game the commentater was Simon Hill not Martin Tyler, which game you talking about?

Good on the aussies for winning, and they played well in the last 10 minutes(lucky the jap's were attacking).

However i dont think they played that well, if it was against brazil or another top side they would have been down more than one goal. Their defence was sooooo open, a good team could have exploited them fully.

Where as at the other end it was always a traffic jam, and australia finally scored when the goalie came off his mark.

Good on the aussies for winning, but they must fix their defence to get anywhere

i think anyone who thinks that they woudl do well against a team like Brazil would have to be severly dellusional.

They should just enjoy their time there as much as possible... before coming back to australia to be heckled by the pathetic aussie media who hype everyone up while theyre winning and then turn on them like a pack of wolves as soon as they fail.

Bloody lost $10 to my fiances mum cause i said the Japs would win... stupid japs.

And i hear the "usual" hooligan behaviour was displayed in the Melb CBD overnight.

farking appaling.

I dont get why you have to trash/loot after a soccer game.

You never see it after an AFL/NRL grand final or anything

And people say they dont wanna be stereo typed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...