Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Further to this I've now been informed that the date for this will be Dec 2nd and 3rd and will involve a minimum of 4 runs per day and will cost aorund $1K to enter.

Will be Dutton Rally regs too - so LS2, normal sprint track regs (no cage etc) and no navigator.

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah it will be super quick. Neil did the buladelah climb which was pretty wide, the old pac is even wider....

and $1k is cheap for an event from the dutton guys :)

Agree it will be quick If you havent done a Tarmac Rally/Road event this will intimidate much more than Race track big balls + wide road = high speeds + big trees = yeha

Wanna know more about "Race to the Pie" ??

http://www.performanceforums.com/forums/sh....php?t=67204771

Guys,

I am allowed to release the following "rumors"

(they are still "rumors" as there are still a few loose ends to finalise - but "they shouldn't be a problem" I was told..)

website coming soon.... (www.racetothepie.com)

Make of them what you will... (and spread the word I was told)

It starts near a bridge and ends near a pie shop

It is on the weekend of Sat 2nd / Sun 3rd December 2006

It's 4.5 Kilometres in length

There will be a limit of 150 cars

It will NOT require a roll cage, and hence NOT needing full CAMS regs in regards to vehicle preparation.. - Obviously there will be other regs that you have to abide by - Fire Extinguisher, Helmet, Clothing, Road Registered and must pass scruitineering etc...

Entry will be under $1,000 per driver (how far under is yet to be finalised)

There will be opportunity for Driver AND co driver runs in the same car.

Vehicles will start at 30 Sec intervals

It is expected that you will get 6-8 runs each per day

As I said, these are the only "rumors" I can release at this stage

So... This looks like the opportunity for those of you who say you are quick on the "insert road here" to prove it.....

What is that saying again...???

When the Flag drops.....

i would be in like flyn but considering i can run 5 track days for under a grand I think common sense tells me sit this one out. :)

So how many track days and cases of piss do i get for the $2200 Dutton Vic entry? Damn the torch that was passed to me and Jamezilla, its now our job to show how ordinary Snowman and Scotsman are :)

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...