Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, could someone check this VIN for me? My Fast cannot pull it up... I'm about to buy this car. Thx alot

This is for Vspec2Nur (The seller Claim it to be)...

Chassis: BNR34-400956

Vin #: GGJPRWYR34ZZAAGZ80

post-26444-1240709961_thumb.jpg

Hi, could someone check this VIN for me? My Fast cannot pull it up... I'm about to buy this car. Thx alot

This is for Vspec2Nur (The seller Claim it to be)...

Chassis: BNR34-400956

Vin #: GGJPRWYR34ZZAAGZ80

Doesnt come up on mine as well, model code indicates it is a Vspec (not sure what version), made in Feb 2001. I thought the NUR version was 2002 ? More qu's need to be asked I suspect.

Mine also doesnt come up on 2008 Jap FAST as well, as i suspect some are deleted from Nissan's database when they are exported.

How about this one

BNR34-403508

again nothing, sorry :D

however i did find out that with 34 GTR's my last recorded vin is

BNR34 - 402137 and anything bigger than that number is not on there.

that vin shows manufacture in July 2001 so i'm guessing the version i have has not been updated since...

Hey..

Not sure if you need any more details but Could you please do this one for me.

rb25 163672a

Cheers

Not sure what those numbers are, check your vin number and it should read something like 6U9000ECR33012345, what i need to do check it is this part of the vin 6U9000ECR33012345

check it out and let me know what it is, ill check it out asap ;)

Use this link to decode your model code

http://www.users.on.net/~goofyhsk/info/chassis_plate.html

It will help you decode everything except the last 4 letters, L, M, Z, G. The following is what i wrote back on page 39 of this thread about 10 posts down if you want to see my entire post.

I have been doing a lot of searching around on the forums for the answer to what the last letters mean on the model codes for the early model r32 GTR's (L,M,Z and G).

cameronbnr32 and garrysandy the only info i could find for you guys (and any one else wondering) was a post from funkymonkey back in 2004.

From what i read the letters L and M, which occupy Positions 8 + 9 in the model code, are known as VS Sign (VS Options)...

L means it has Projector Headlights

M means it has both climate comtrol + upgraded stereo

Letters Z and G occupy Positions 10 + 11 in the model code and are known as Pack Sign (Package Extras Sign)...

Z Im still not sure what it means but some guys believe it might be to do with the interior trim. RellikZephyr Thought Z = Black Interior Trim.

Cant be confirmed unless funkymonkey or someone else knows for sure what it means.

G from what i found means ABS and a Viscous LSD

Hope that helps a lil.

Was this ever expanded upon? My car has one of those odd model codes.

KBNR32RXFSLMZG

Strangely this gives a build date of 6/90 rather than the FAST 10/89 for my chassis BNR32002505:

http://fteqw.com/moodles/model-decoder.php...amp;chassis_no=

This doesn't give all the answers either. So weird. :)

http://www.users.on.net/~goofyhsk/info/chassis_plate.html

Was this ever expanded upon? My car has one of those odd model codes.

KBNR32RXFSLMZG

Strangely this gives a build date of 6/90 rather than the FAST 10/89 for my chassis BNR32002505:

http://fteqw.com/moodles/model-decoder.php...amp;chassis_no=

This doesn't give all the answers either. So weird. :)

http://www.users.on.net/~goofyhsk/info/chassis_plate.html

As far as i know there is no date information in the Model Code, so 10/89 it is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...