Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The standard Ferrari Enzo not good enough for you? Why not have it customised by Pininfarina.

post-20773-1155824398.jpg

Most collectors would be happy enough to just own a Ferrari — any Ferrari.

There wouldn't be many who would feel the need to remodel one, let alone a top-of-the-range Enzo worth close to $2 million.

Computer modelling was used to help design the P4/5, the shape of the Enzo being altered to take on the domed roof, rear wing and rear exhaust outlets of the 330 P4.

More than 200 components were especially made for the car.

The body is made from carbon fibre, and the entire turret is a single-shell windscreen cut to accommodate butterfly-wing doors.

The whole project probably cost Glickenhaus about $8 million.

And an interview with the owner.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130719-why-mess-with-perfection/
Share on other sites

I think it looks pretty cool. But for that money... that an Aston, Porka GT, Porka 997 turboS, Ford GT, big arse house, small unit up the coast, small unit down the coast, and invest the rest so you dont need to work again.

I think ferrari is such a wank.

They have cars that cost around 350,000 for a base model and then have factory options like "Handling package" and "brake package" It's a Ferrari you'd think they'd turn and stop pretty well out of the shop.

wank factor = 11 well call me a wanker cause i would swap my skyline for it anyday .good luck to bloke for daring to be different and if ya can afford the 8 mill why would ya give a rats arse what anyone else thought i know i wouldnt lol

lol.. no seriously, good on him for investing his time and effort into his passion, i wish i could make my own custom supercar

... but still that thing is so ugly it makes the original enzo look good

So what he should have done is invest in a BN Body Kit, 24" chrome Zeptana's and some pulsing neons maybe ?? :O:D

There's a Chop project for you ................ :)

Is it just me or does a stock enzo look better

Each to their own I guess, but I with you Lee. I prefer the "stock" Enzo.

Not that it matters because pics on the internet is the closest I'll ever come to owning one :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...