Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks for that matey.

Does anyone know what the model GGKBRTFR34UDA-KJB- tells me about the car? btw its a 98 R34 GTT.

I have searched this thread but there isnt much that deciphers R34 codes.

Thanks

I got the same problem, except I am trying to get the Stagea code translated.........

Hey Guys!

I was wondering if anyone was able to tell me the part #'s for the pedal box in an R34 GT-t and an R33 GTS-t?

Sorry dude I would not have a clue what I am looking for.........?

I was wondering if anyone was able to tell me the part #'s for the pedal box in an R34 GT-t and an R33 GTS-t?

I can tell you that, but clutch and brake have separate pedal boxes since the R31 models. Anyway for 98-99 R34 GTT the pedal box PN's are (Nissan call them 'brackets'):

Clutch (no pedal) - 46550-AA000

Brake (with pedal) - 46551-AA000

[don't ask me why one comes with and one without a pedal....I have NFI]

For an early series 1 R33 GTS-t, the PN's are (same situation as described above):

Clutch (no pedal) - 46550-21U00

Brake (with pedal) - 46551-70T00

There appear to be a number of running production changes shown in FAST for R33's, so an exact VIN would be needed to tie-down the correct PN's (eg cars with cruise control have a different PN for the brake pedal assy).

Hope that helps

GGKBRTFR34UDA-KJB-

Some of it is:

G = ?? (2 something-or-other; sometimes this indicates the plant In Japan where the car was made)

GK = RB25DE or RB25DET

B = 2WD (2 wheel drive)

R = ??

T = GTT, GTV, GTXT, GT4, GT4/L, GTX4

F = ?? (5 something-or-other, I'd say 5 speed manual)

R34 = well........

U = ??

D = ??

A = ??

- = not relevant

K = ?? (some sort of option)

J = ?? (some sort of option)

B = ?? (some sort of option)

- = not relevant

I have a feeling someone else posted some info about what these codes mean. You need an English version of FAST or the someone that can interpret the Japanese version.

Is that an aussie built R32? Hey have you still got the AU FAST?

they are no aussie built R32s or 33s or 34s for that matter. all built in japan mate. also there are no aussie delivered 32 GTSTs either. only 100 GTRs and they are all 1990 or 1991 off the top of my head.

they are no aussie built R32s or 33s or 34s for that matter. all built in japan mate. also there are no aussie delivered 32 GTSTs either. only 100 GTRs and they are all 1990 or 1991 off the top of my head.

Cool thanks for that info!

does anyone have suggestions as to why my chassis number doesnt come up in the FAST software? could this mean something bad??? im stressed!!

Wouldn't get stressed about, might be simple as a database error which could have been fixed in a later version of FAST than we have access to. You need to go back and double check that number on the manufacturing ID plate attached to the firewall - it's usually blue - just to be sure.

I'm using the 2005 FAST and it seems to work on it. Although your VIN dosen't seem to come up, nor the details of your car, just the build date. So I'd say someone made a mistake during the data entry back in 1993 :rolleyes:

And yes we do have the Aussie FAST databases, but it dosen't have any Skylines in it, only cars manufactured in Australia.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...