Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i go autobarn/repco already, but the staff said they dun have it for my car

well tell them to pull their finger out. i have personally seen the listing in the NGK book for both r32 and r33 skylines. they may be using an old book. they won't have it in stock, they will have to order it.

if they still say they can't get it, ask for 1 for a n15 SSS pulsar (sr20 motor). they should be able to find that since they aren't an import (well they are, but nissan imported them. they aren't a private import like skylines). they are the same part number.

Edited by mad082
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135291-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-2522948
Share on other sites

i just called repco australia. god they are the slackest people in the world.

gave the dude a call and asked him for a skyline o2 sensor, and straight up he says: "you'll have to do some reseach otherwise i can't get the part number for you"

wtf?!

anyway

BOSCH: 2269013007 = $ 126

NGK: 0zA395 E2 = $155

why are the skyline ones so pricey, a mate bought one for his S13 SR20 for $50 @ repco the other week!

that said there's a trader for SAu selling the NGK ones for $110 plus $10.50 postage.

i've seen posts where people have gotten direct fit sensors for like $75.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135291-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-2523748
Share on other sites

heh funny story, i asked the same dude who you rang (eug) at repco this morning while i was in store with some mates and he thought i was you....

anyway cheers for the part numbers, i will be getting my o2 sensor changed soon too. 20L/100km sux bigtime

Edited by flagger
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135291-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-2524833
Share on other sites

agreed. a new o2 sensor made no difference to my fuel economy, although some claim it made a huge difference to theirs.

from what i gather, the biggest difference between differing results (besides safc or pfc) is whether you're clocking up k's on the open road, or city driving.

my results, ~ 50L / 320kms city driving - 420kms freeway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135291-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-2525277
Share on other sites

i called NGK last week...

the guy had no listing for the rb20det

then, he said he'd do some research and call japan and see if he can get one in..

he called me back.. moral of the story? NGK don't make an O2 sensor for the rb20det

END OF STORY

well they should recall all of their catalogues that say they do.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135291-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-2528021
Share on other sites

dude at repco tried to charge me $140, and $150 for the NTK and Bosch ones... wtf... then tried to sell me a universal ACA one...

just ordered one from kudos motorsports... see how things go

car is no longer running rich, bit more free reving, certainly feels a little faster...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135291-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-2528041
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...