Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I missed out getting an alignment before heading up to NSW due to work.

I just did the trak day at wakefield and had massive understeer problems as the car just wouldn't turn in at all. I lowered the car at Wakefield 5mm on front strut and 10mm on rear strut and the car seemed a lot more settled at the end of the straight. Also backing the front swaybar off one notch from hardest helped.

I had an alignment after and found out that the car was all over the place. For example rear toe +5.8 and -1.7mm. This was the third time driving the gtr and first time with non blown stock lowered shocks. I know I have heaps to learn about driving at the tracks but I have a quick question after reading through a old Beer Barron thread.

The end result is got were after alignment:

front camber: 3.5 deg neg. Good for EC and PI but would be to much for most tracks I guess.

front caster: 5 degrees

front toe: -0.5mm each side

rear camber: 2 deg neg. This was to much for even EC. Will set it to -1.5deg and try that.

rear toe: +1mm each side

front sway bar: one off hardest (mine is the 3 hole type)22mm

rear sway bar: medium (also 3 hole type)

The car handled a lot better at EC and I could hold a lot more corner speed but the car just understeered a little to much and had bad turn in. I know my tyres are at least 2.5 year old falken rt215's and lack grip. The best hand timed lap I got was a flat 1.52 and I know there would easily be a flat 1.48-1.49 in there if the car could carry a little more corner speed with the current tyres/brakes. Still have to measure ride hieght after I empty the car out.

Question is will increasing the toe out front and rear to 2mm each side help turn in and corner grip.

Well I think you need to start with some proper track tyres and then see how you go f mthere

Road tyres are endlessly frustrating at track speeds.

Maybe also try turning into corners a little later and see if that helps

I tried going into corners later but I was also going slower. I'm after overall increased corner speed. I agree with the street tyres but they have to do until they run out of tread.

I don't want to run more caster and risk uni lives and as for running the rear bar stiffer I think it would just make the car slide in the rear more on accel out of corners and not really improve turn in. It felt good when on full power out of corners but I had to brake really late into the corner to make the rear unsettle and them gas it really hard. I want a more balanced package. If it didn't understeer into the corner it should be setup right for the way out.

Seriously...scratched record...what you describe is how most GTRs i have driven handle. Scotsmans is the only car i have drive (albeit) briefly that handled really nicely. Maybe see what he has done to his or get Racepace/Techsport to have a look at it. (And that shouldnt sound like i have driven lots of GTRs, i havent)

What shocks have you got these days...and 1:52 on hack rubber is pretty good

The car has some circuit valved shocks from sydneykid. It could possibly do with some softer springs for the street tyres but I don't really know. Chris told me that after racepace put a lot extra caster into snowys car it made it handle like his. But I think they actually move the castor mount position on the chassis and modify cusco upper mounts. This is what I understood from my conversation. When I asked Chris all he knew was that if you give RP $800 to adjust the suspension they'll make a r33 gtr handle awesome.

The car is the best handling car I have owned to date now but I know there are a few little things I could do to make it go quicker around corners. I know if I braked harder and linked all of the corners together right in one lap it could have done a 1.50ish time but I'm still learning how to drive gtrs. I have all the power I need for a reliable engine. I bought some spacers from UAS to run 324mm rotors and some ds3000 pads so the suspension is the only thing I need to correct to make the car do the times I want out of it.

I just wanted to know if anybody has run with toe in and then gone to go out and what was the result in how the car handled.

From SK himself

Run it at 355 mm centre of wheel to guard at the front and 345 mm at the rear. Use a 24 mm solid front adjustable stabiliser bar on the softest setting. A 24 mm solid rear adjustable stabiliser bar on the middle setting. The rear spring rate needed is ~250 lbs per inch (4.5 kg/mm), the front is ~400 lbs per inch (7.2 kg/mm). Set the rear subframe alignment bushes to the "all round setting". Try for 6.5 degree of positive caster on the front, with 3.5 degrees of negative camber and 2 mm of toe out each side. On the rear, 1.5 degrees of negative camber with zero toe out.

Then adjust the camber for even tyre temps. If it needs more than 4 degrees negative camber on the front, then you don’t have enough bump valving in the shocks.

Once you achieve even tyre temps, then you can adjust the stabiliser bare to achieve the handling balance you like. If it still understeers on corner entry, try another 2 mm of toe out on the rear. If you get mid corner understeer and the front tyre temps are even, then increase the rear ride height, 5 mm is usually enough. If it power oversteers and the rear tyres temps are even, then back off the rear bar I hole. If it still power oversteers then change the rear subframe setting to “max traction”.

Sorry I didn't make it down to Wakefield, I had a stinking head cold on Monday and missed a day, so work was piled up like crazy for Wednesday.

Add to the above kindly posted by salad.

Try the front bar on full soft and the rear bar on full hard. That should cure the mid corner understeer. If it still has corner entry understeer, try 3 mm of toe out on the front and 2 mm of toe out on the rear. You maye find that amount of rear toe out a bit unsettling under brakes, some drivers don't like the nervousness it causes.

If it still understeers, then you have a tyre problem that no amount of suspension tuning will fix.

:yes: cheers :P

Is this 3mm each side or overall for the front toe? All in all the car was good and I didn't really have a chance to adjust much. I will slowly try different adjustments but the only problem I have is most of it will have to wait for track time because there's not good corners in my area.

SydneyKid, would you not agree that lowering the rear, more then the front will induce understeer.

Every car I've found, that if you drop the rear more then the front, you induce understeer.

Would it be more advisable to raise the rear back to it's original position and leave the front DOWN the 5mm from original...

So hence, the guy has made the setup worse by is lowering abilities.

The ride height front to rear, and overall is as important to the setup as is the toe/camber/caster afterall.

....then you have a tyre problem that no amount of suspension tuning will fix.

I still strongly beleive this is your main problem - there is no point trying to fix handling on the track until you start with a good platform....you will probably find you don't have an understeer problem at all once you put good track tyres on it :D

I still strongly beleive this is your main problem - there is no point trying to fix handling on the track until you start with a good platform....you will probably find you don't have an understeer problem at all once you put good track tyres on it :D

I'm in total dis-agreeance here.

What you're doing by putting on a stickier tyre, is making the whole lot of the car grip harder.

Whilst it grips harder, you FEEL like you're pushing the car as hard as it can, BUT when it comes unstuck, its going to come unstuck in much the same fashion, as it did with shit tyres, BUT, you'll be doing a great deal of knots/hour more then the shit tyre.

Sort the suspension out on a low grip tyre. It'll tell you EXACTLY what's wrong in the setup. Once the car is handling how you want, wack on some REALLY grippy tyres.

Slam it round the track as quick as possible then. You'll find you'll do a quicker lap time, on the grippy tyres AFTER running on bad tyres tuning the suspension, then what you will by wacking on some uber grippy tyres and doing the same amount of laps.

The uber grippy tyres still have the exact same suspension setup, meaning the cars characteristics, are at a higher level, but the coefficient of friction has been improved dramatically, Hence, a greater force is required to break the grip, hence, a higher speed is required, but you'll still reach it. At a higher speed, and you'll understeer.

Sort the suspension out so it doesn't understeer, then wack the grippy tyres on.

Yeh makes sense, but then you consider what happens when you have more grip. More roll, more dive under brakes on turn in...the whoel dynamic of the car can be changed. Best bet is live with it until you end up getting the rubber you are going to be running then get it sorted for those tyres.

Yeh makes sense, but then you consider what happens when you have more grip. More roll, more dive under brakes on turn in...the whoel dynamic of the car can be changed. Best bet is live with it until you end up getting the rubber you are going to be running then get it sorted for those tyres.

Usually a small tweak here, a small tweak there, gets the car back exactly how you want it. And then again, driver behaviour changes, so in the end, he may like the car to understeer, I know some people who do like this, whilst others prefer the car to majorly oversteer, particularly on throttle (Just how they corner)

But generally, it's easier to sort out suspension, on something that will let go easily.

Effectively, you'd rather test out how your new intake valve on an indoors fire works when being lit with soft wood, as it lights up easier, but in the end, you'll use hard wood.

The reason, it gets to your testing point quicker, and easier, kinda.

But the same "reasoning" can be bought across in my personal opinion.

But remember, everyone drives there car differently, and hence, we all set them up differently.

My biggest theory, is that the ride height is fuxored, secondly, it's AWD, prone to understeer, thirdly, front toe is incorrect.

For grip, you want toe in (Grip mid corner) but you loose responsive ness,

Toe out gives you responsive ness, but reduces mid corner grip.

If my memory serves me right (As I talk in 3mm toe in/out not +3mm), positive toe, is toe out, hence, a very responsive ride, BUT no mid corner grip.

And I'd be running as a tester, 0 rear toe, and upto 1mm maximum toe in. (WRX are renowned for having sideways issues if they run any more then 1mm toe out on the rear)

But where I start my setup at, I hand it to my wheel alignment specialist, he's worked on enough race cars suspension wise, I'm just going off what he has told me.

SydneyKid, would you not agree that lowering the rear, more then the front will induce understeer.

Every car I've found, that if you drop the rear more then the front, you induce understeer.

Would it be more advisable to raise the rear back to it's original position and leave the front DOWN the 5mm from original...

So hence, the guy has made the setup worse by is lowering abilities.

The ride height front to rear, and overall is as important to the setup as is the toe/camber/caster afterall.

I gave him the ride height recommendations, as long as he stuck within them, ride height won't be the cause of his understeer. If he has lowered the rear bleow those recommendatioons then that would be a problem.

:D Cheers :P

I'm in total dis-agreeance here.

What you're doing by putting on a stickier tyre, is making the whole lot of the car grip harder.

Whilst it grips harder, you FEEL like you're pushing the car as hard as it can, BUT when it comes unstuck, its going to come unstuck in much the same fashion, as it did with shit tyres, BUT, you'll be doing a great deal of knots/hour more then the shit tyre.

Sort the suspension out on a low grip tyre. It'll tell you EXACTLY what's wrong in the setup. Once the car is handling how you want, wack on some REALLY grippy tyres.

Slam it round the track as quick as possible then. You'll find you'll do a quicker lap time, on the grippy tyres AFTER running on bad tyres tuning the suspension, then what you will by wacking on some uber grippy tyres and doing the same amount of laps.

The uber grippy tyres still have the exact same suspension setup, meaning the cars characteristics, are at a higher level, but the coefficient of friction has been improved dramatically, Hence, a greater force is required to break the grip, hence, a higher speed is required, but you'll still reach it. At a higher speed, and you'll understeer.

Sort the suspension out so it doesn't understeer, then wack the grippy tyres on.

The problem with GTR’s is that they are so god damn nose heavy. They work the front tyres hard under brakes. Then they are reluctant to turn in, so you work the front tyres hard up to the slip angle limit. Then they have mid corner push, which further raises the tyre skin temperature. On corner exit they transfer some power to the front wheels further increasing the load on them and exacerbating the tread overheat problem.

So if you are using well worn tyres, there is simply not enough tread on the carcass and they overheat badly after only a couple of laps. A newer tyre (not a brand new tyre), by virtue of its increase ability to handle and dissipate heart, is far more capable of sustaining the desired line.

Then we have the “R” type tyres, which are by design. able to handle higher temperatures. Plus they don’t generate as much heat due to their ability to handle more extreme slip angles.

Tyre tread overheat induced understeer can be cured by very small decreases in temperature. As little as 5 degrees can make a noticeable difference. This then brings the poor overworked front tyre on a GTR back to similar temperatures to the rear tyres. Hence restoring the handling balance, not dramatically altering it.

In summary, it would be simplistic to say that going to “R” tyres would still show up the same handling imbalance. The statement “if it understeers on crap tyres then it will still understeer on good tyres” is hence not always correct. In fact most times it is incorrect when it comes to cars with large weight imbalances front to rear.

:D cheers :P

Interesting read, all so complicated.

Personally I am a big fan of the massive shudder the R spec tyres give when you have gone too far past their optimum slip angle. Off to see the dentist now to get the fillings put back into my teeth. Sweet.

:pirate:

post-5134-1163486066.jpg

The problem with GTR’s is that they are so god damn nose heavy. They work the front tyres hard under brakes. Then they are reluctant to turn in, so you work the front tyres hard up to the slip angle limit. Then they have mid corner push, which further raises the tyre skin temperature. On corner exit they transfer some power to the front wheels further increasing the load on them and exacerbating the tread overheat problem.

So if you are using well worn tyres, there is simply not enough tread on the carcass and they overheat badly after only a couple of laps. A newer tyre (not a brand new tyre), by virtue of its increase ability to handle and dissipate heart, is far more capable of sustaining the desired line.

Then we have the “R” type tyres, which are by design. able to handle higher temperatures. Plus they don’t generate as much heat due to their ability to handle more extreme slip angles.

Tyre tread overheat induced understeer can be cured by very small decreases in temperature. As little as 5 degrees can make a noticeable difference. This then brings the poor overworked front tyre on a GTR back to similar temperatures to the rear tyres. Hence restoring the handling balance, not dramatically altering it.

In summary, it would be simplistic to say that going to “R” tyres would still show up the same handling imbalance. The statement “if it understeers on crap tyres then it will still understeer on good tyres” is hence not always correct. In fact most times it is incorrect when it comes to cars with large weight imbalances front to rear.

:pirate: cheers :)

Ah, that's fair enough then.

Just a thought I had, would it be an idea, to add in a brake balance, dial in more rear wheel brake force. From what I've seen/read, when running more rear brakes, yes, the back tyres can become very easy to lock, but when you hit the corner, as you're not loading the front end up as much (You're just putting the weight there, you're not asking the tyre to attempt to slow down as much) you have alot more available grip, and when you start to turn in, since the back end is doing most of the braking it is more "twitchy" and alot more ready to comply with a turn in command (But do it too early and be warned of alot of sideways action)

Do you think this would work?

I'm just bouncing ideas now off you SK...

I believe I don't have enough rear brake bias. After a whole day at the track there was hardly any rear pad dust and I'm only running el cheapo pads. I think it is time for a big bleed first. I put the abs back in and bled it but maybe in needs some more bleeding.

What you are saying makes sense. It could help stop a little of the weight transfer to the front and there for take some weight of the front tyres. Good idea. I have never had a problem with the rears locking.

One of the really quick Vic guys drives his car fast by braking a little later into the apex to unsettle the rear of the car so he can drive out fast without power understeer. And he is fast!

There is no way of putting more rear bias into a gtr though unless you change the master cylinder right? Anyway I won't be doing this. Hopefully some good pads will sort this area out.

Keep your suggestion and opinions coming in. All of your tried knowledge is better than my theory's atm.

What is the general time increase with running semi's over average street tyres? Am I right in guessing 2-3 secinds a lap on a 1.30ish circuit?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
    • Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...