Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Rowdy.

Generally, I've been advised, to get good braking across front and rear, to run a higher temp set of pads in the front, then in the rear.

And also, if you really want to, run solid rotors in the rear, and run slotted and ventilated rotors in the front.

Generally brings the rear pads efficiency up a little bit more compared to the fronts.

But, the true way to adjust brake balance, is by adjusting either caliper sizes, or getting a brake bias adjuster.

The brake balance front to rear won't change how much the front of the car dives, that is caused by the total braking force not the front/rear split, and the front alignment and suspension.

All you need for brake balance is both front and rear tyres getting to lock up at exactly the same time. its that easy lol

If you want an effect where the tail is looser under brakes you should start with toe out in the rear. Softer front springs, rear brake bias and 2 way diffs are all just ways to bastardise your rear end handling to make it lock up....just does not make sense for that purpose.

Certainly in some cars like light fwd you might want the tail to swing mid corner but not in a big rwd, you are better of keeping it tidy, late brake and apex and then on the gas hard.

Yes the semis are worth 3-5 seconds depending on the track, and also they will last much better than road tyres on the track too - with roadies you always want to push them to hard so you end up chewing them to peices, especially on the outside edges.

If you want cheap semis look outside the bridgestone and dunlops, maybe try falkens, toyos etc, they are about half the price. Also stick to smaller rims 16 or 17 they get much more expensive in larger sizes

I believe I don't have enough rear brake bias. After a whole day at the track there was hardly any rear pad dust and I'm only running el cheapo pads. I think it is time for a big bleed first. I put the abs back in and bled it but maybe in needs some more bleeding.

What you are saying makes sense. It could help stop a little of the weight transfer to the front and there for take some weight of the front tyres. Good idea. I have never had a problem with the rears locking.

One of the really quick Vic guys drives his car fast by braking a little later into the apex to unsettle the rear of the car so he can drive out fast without power understeer. And he is fast!

There is no way of putting more rear bias into a gtr though unless you change the master cylinder right? Anyway I won't be doing this. Hopefully some good pads will sort this area out.

Keep your suggestion and opinions coming in. All of your tried knowledge is better than my theory's atm.

What is the general time increase with running semi's over average street tyres? Am I right in guessing 2-3 secinds a lap on a 1.30ish circuit?

You need to differentiate the cars handling characteristics during the three (four if you want to be pedantic) sections of a corner.

1. Braking prior to the corner.

2. Turn in.

3. Mid corner.

4. Power down/corner exit.

If you trail brake during turn in you will reduce your understeer markedly. This is not a function of brake distribution (front/rear) as the pedal effort used is quite small. In an understeering biased car (read GT-R) it may have the effect of reducing your speed during part 3 (ie mid corner) of the turn. Done properly it will reduce the time spent at low TPS & hence allow the important bit, ie power down to happen earlier. You can then carry more speed down the following straight which is important as it has more of an effect on your lap time than apex speed.

You use trail braking to transfer weight onto the front tyres & hence allow them to develop more grip. You shouldn't be trying to unsettle the rear as this will simply lose you time.

In any case mucking about with brakes, toe settings & small adjustments in camber will not solve a fundamental issue with the ride height & rake angle. You need to sort this first as some settings can markedly change the behaviour of the car in the different parts of the corner.

Snowy I forgot we have one at work. One of the guys dragged it out today when we were in testcell. I'll bring it along to the next track day. It would be really interesting to see the difference between all the cars and the speeds they're doing.

You need to be carefull when using laser pyrometers, they measure the skin temperature (ie; the tread surface). This is affected by stuff like the run down pit lane. For example, if you have lots of negative camber, the skin on the inside of the tyre will stay hot while the skin on the outside will cool down rather rapidly. That's why race teams use probe style pyrometers which enable us to read the temperature just below the skin, which doesn't cool down as quickly.

Regardless of which type of pyrometer you use, make sure that you don't slow down on the in lap if you want representative temperatures. Come it hot, then measure and then go out for a cool down lap.

:D Cheers :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...